Or, you know, at least one of them.
When she was the attorney general of California, this obviously innocent and framed man tried to get some new DNA tests done on the murder weapon and she fought him.
That makes her an accessory to murder if his execution ever goes through.
Oh, but now she tells the NYT that she hopes things work out.
Recent
[R]elative shares in national income have remained substantially constant over the last hundred years. This, however, is true only if we measure them in money. Measured in real terms, relative shares have substantially changed in favor of the lower income groups. This...
Why would anyone think that condemning a murder must imply any particular judgment about the victim?
I am saddened by Charlie Kirk's passing and the method by which he left this life. Whether you agree with him or not, there is never a good reason for this kind of speech cancellation to take place. Kirk took the fight to Ground Zero for American government...
