Backdraft: How U.S. Sanctions on Russia May Burn the Dollar

by | Apr 11, 2022

Backdraft: How U.S. Sanctions on Russia May Burn the Dollar

by | Apr 11, 2022

https bucketeer e05bbc84 baa3 437e 9518 adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com public images abc3e327 0d6c 4c1e ba34 04fd7903fca5 4000x3000

There’s much to despise about economic sanctions. Aside from the fundamental immorality of making innocent individuals suffer for the sins of governments, sanctions almost universally fail to achieve the goals of those who inflict them.

Nonetheless, sanctions have become the knee-jerk U.S. government response to any real or claimed foreign misdeed. According to the U.S. Treasury department, the number of U.S.-imposed sanctions soared 933% between 2000 and 2021.

Where today’s Ukraine invasion-prompted sanctions are concerned, civilians in Russia and all around the world are already feeling the effects, via increasingly expensive and scarce food, fuel and other goods.

In the end, however, the greatest damage may be inflicted on the United States government and its citizens: By incentivizing Russia and other countries to stop using U.S. dollars for trade, the sanctions regime threatens to topple the dollar from its position of global preeminence. That could spell disaster for the American economy and hasten the end of the U.S. empire.

You can read the rest of this article at Stark Realities with Brian McGlinchey

Stark Realities with Brian McGlinchey

Stark Realities with Brian McGlinchey

STARK REALITIES undermines official narratives, demolishes conventional wisdom and exposes fundamental myths across the political spectrum. McGlinchey has appeared on the Scott Horton Show, Tom Woods Show and Ron Paul Liberty Report, and spoken at the Ron Paul Institute's annual conference and Ron Paul Scholars Seminar. Join thousands of free subscribers

View all posts

Recent Articles

Recent

An Unpopular War Is Breaking the People Fighting It

An Unpopular War Is Breaking the People Fighting It

A sailor aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln sent a message home that his family passed to Stars and Stripes anonymously, fearing retaliation. "Our mental health and physical health is in danger. We need help." By the time that message surfaced, the Lincoln had been gone...

read more
Whose ‘NAP’ Anyway?

Whose ‘NAP’ Anyway?

A considerable portion of libertarian infighting seems to stem from the largely unrecognized fact that there are two different ways to interpret the non-aggression principle (NAP). On the surface, the NAP seems clear: aggression is wrong. But there is a deontological...

read more
Presidential Entitlement and the 1998 Bombing of Sudan

Presidential Entitlement and the 1998 Bombing of Sudan

Last week was the 28th anniversary of the U.S. government's bombing of a pharmaceutical factory in Sudan. Scott Horton, director of the Libertarian Institute, observed last week that that wanton assault by the Clinton administration “helped make a folk hero out of bin...

read more

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This