Synergy Between Idealism And Pragmatism

by | Jul 17, 2017

I’ve always been convinced that what makes sense idealistically ought to parallel what works practically.  There shouldn’t be a deontology/consequentialism debate in Libertarianism.  The same principles which grant ideological sanction to liberty cause it to be an effective ideology in terms of meeting needs.

Individual people decide what it is they want out of life.  Sure, we sometimes want things by means of our place in a group – but we arrive here for individual reasons.  Sure, there are universal human needs such as food, but the context in which people consume or enjoy food, including the costs and trade-offs, vary infinitely.

Liberty, ideologically, says that people should make their own choices as it pertains to their own life and values.  Why does this ideological position exist?  Because people recognized the natural conditions which show that people generally desire liberty – that free choice is consistent with free will, that liberty reflects fundamental axioms of human action.

Liberty, according to the conclusions of free market economics, and Liberal politics, promotes the optimal level of wealth and social harmony that a society can attain over the long run.  Why?  Because it’s the “system” most consistent with what it is people want.  The market is efficient because it makes room for the natural reality that people have different preferences that are unknown to the central planner.  Maybe it’s that socialists discount this natural reality in believing in the efficacy of their own economic programs.  That is, if people didn’t have varied preferences, if we didn’t express and explore our preferences individually – as an axiomatic principle of human nature – then maybe socialist economics would be more efficient.

The question isn’t whether ideology or pragmatism should rule the day.  It’s not even a question of which economic system seems more efficient, or which moral system seems more noble.  It’s a question of: what are humans like, and what are we willing to say or not say about the purpose of human life?  Everything else follows.

Zack Sorenson

Zack Sorenson

Zachary Sorenson was a captain in the United States Air Force before quitting because of a principled opposition to war. He received a MBA from Waseda University in Tokyo, Japan as class valedictorian. He also has a BA in Economics and a BS in Computer Science.

View all posts

Our Books

Shop books published by the Libertarian Institute.

libetarian institute longsleeve shirt

Support via Amazon Smile

Our Books

15 books

Recent Articles

Recent

Whose Plan?

"The alternative is not plan or no plan. The question is whose planning? Should each member of society plan for himself, or should a benevolent government alone plan for them all? The issue is not automatism versus conscious action; it is autonomous action of each...

read more

What Full Liberalism Is Not About

"Liberalism is a doctrine directed entirely towards the conduct of men in this world. In the last analysis, it has nothing else in view than the advancement of their outward, material welfare and does not concern itself directly with their inner, spiritual and...

read more

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This