Court strikes down ban on campaign contributions from medical marijuana licensees

by | Mar 27, 2017

Court strikes down ban on campaign contributions from medical marijuana licensees

by | Mar 27, 2017

A federal court has struck down an Illinois law that banned licensed medical marijuana businesses from making contributions to candidates PACs and other political committees.

In a decision issued March 24, U.S. District Court Judge John Z. Lee ruled that the ban violated the businesses’ First Amendment rights.

Judge Lee ruled that the state had provided no justification for banning contributions from the medical cannabis industry while not banning contributions from any other regulated industries.

“By singling out medical cannabis organizations,” Judge Lee wrote, the state appeared to be favoring certain speakers based on their viewpoints – precisely the type of discrimination the Supreme Court has disapproved of in the past.

Judge Lee also observed that Illinois election law already limits contributions by individuals to $5,000 and contributions by corporations to $10,000 (with adjustments for inflation), and the state failed to explain why these limits wouldn’t sufficiently address any concerns about corruption related to contributions by the medical marijuana industry in particular.

The case was brought by the Liberty Justice Center and the Pillar of Law Institute on behalf of two Libertarian Party candidates for state offices, Claire Ball and Scott Schluter, who wished to seek contributions from the industry but could not do so because of the ban. Now they and all other candidates in Illinois are free to do so.

Read the rest at the Illinois Policy Institute.

About Jacob Huebert

Jacob H. Huebert is senior attorney at the Liberty Justice Center, a public-interest litigation firm in Chicago, and is the author of Libertarianism Today.

Our Books

latest book lineup.

Related Articles

Related

In Defense of Inaction

In Defense of Inaction

On March 17, The Wall Street Journal published an op-ed by a woman named Mary Anastasia O’Grady titled, “Giving up on Haiti Isn’t a U.S. Option.” She argues, in short, that Americans don’t have a choice but to continue doing all the things that have failed in the past...

read more
Is America a Rogue Superpower?

Is America a Rogue Superpower?

“Unipolar” used to mean that the United States was, at least in theory, alone in leading the world. Now “unipolar” means that the United States is alone and isolated in opposition to the world. In global affairs, a hegemon is a nation that leads because it has the...

read more
Collateral Murder 2.0

Collateral Murder 2.0

When the footage of Reuters journalists and civilians were Wikileaked to the world, there was outrage. A shame exhibited by some in the American government caused them to reel from the crime that had been exposed, to downplay the prevalence of such murders, and...

read more
The Fed and the Fight for 2%

The Fed and the Fight for 2%

Last week, Jerome Powell & Co. met to issue an immediate decision regarding the status of the federal funds rate for March, and to provide some insight into the trajectory of monetary policy for the rest of 2024 and into 2025. As with the past few inflation...

read more
Truth Has No Chance on Capitol Hill

Truth Has No Chance on Capitol Hill

Americans are encouraged to believe that the U.S. Congress is practically on automatic pilot to serve the public. Happily, most Americans are not so gullible and Congress receives much of the contempt it deserves in public opinion polls. But the media and the...

read more
What Is ‘Extremism’?

What Is ‘Extremism’?

Amidst protests in the United Kingdom that have been going on since October 7, there have been multiple allegations of extemists among the protestors intimidating, harassing, and scaring innocent people who are not involved in the demonstrations. It seems that even...

read more