Illinois Overwhelmingly Approves Bill to Protect the Innocent from Civil Forfeiture

by | Jun 25, 2017

Illinois Overwhelmingly Approves Bill to Protect the Innocent from Civil Forfeiture

by | Jun 25, 2017

Today, the Illinois House of Representatives passed a bill that bolsters transparency for civil forfeiture and strengthens due process protections for innocent property owners. Under civil forfeiture, law enforcement agencies can seize and then take title to cash, cars and other valuables without charging anyone with—let alone convicting them of—a crime.

“Through its comprehensive disclosure requirements, this law will play a vital role in keeping both the public and legislators well-informed about civil forfeiture in Illinois,” said Institute for Justice Senior Legislative Counsel Lee McGrath. “The governor needs to sign this vital reform.”

Unanimously approved by the Senate last month, HB 303 received just one vote against it in the floor vote today. The bill now heads to Gov. Bruce Rauner for signature. If he signs, HB 303 would:

  • Oblige agencies to report their forfeiture expenditures, including spending on salaries, overtime, compensation for crime victims, drug abuse programs, travel, meals and operating expenses;
  • Require that all forfeiture reporting be posted to a public, searchable database on the Department of State Police’s website.
  • Allow the Department   to adopt rules that require withholding forfeiture funds from noncompliant agencies;
  • Mandate regular, independent audits for the State Asset Forfeiture Fund;
  • Institute new notice requirements; and
  • Shift the burden of proof from the property owner onto the state—where it belongs.

“Shining a light on forfeiture fund spending is particularly important because Illinois law lets agencies keep 90 percent of what they confiscate,” noted Jennifer McDonald, an IJ research analyst who co-authored a report on forfeiture transparency and accountability. “This self-financing outside of the legislature’s power of the purse has long enabled law enforcement to escape public scrutiny and accountability.”

In addition, HB 303 would repeal the state’s “cost bond” requirement, which forces owners to pay the greater of $100 or 10 percent of their property’s value, all before they can even challenge a civil forfeiture case in court. If enacted, Illinois would follow Michigan, which repealed its cost bond in January, and leave just three states with that requirement.

Read the rest at the Institute for Justice here.

About Nick Sibilla

As a Communications Associate for the Institute for Justice, Nick Sibilla regularly writes opeds and blog posts and enhances IJ’s presence on social media. He is also a contributor to Forbes.com, where he covers civil forfeiture, occupational licensing, food freedom and the First Amendment.

Our Books

6 Libooks011721lg

Related Articles

Related

Privacy and the Constitution

"[B]oth the [']liberals['] and the conservatives misunderstand privacy. The conservatives engage in a narrow and unnatural reading of the Constitution in order to avoid seeing what they do not wish to see, while the [']liberals['] find in the Constitution not...

read more

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This