Property Rights: The Individual Over the State

by | Oct 3, 2018

Property Rights: The Individual Over the State

by | Oct 3, 2018

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:John_Locke.jpg

Philosophers have often made the claim that individuals have a natural right to property. For example, John Locke wrote:

“Though the earth, and all inferior creatures, be common to all men, yet every man has a property in his own person: this no body has any right to but himself. The labour of his body, and the work of his hands, we may say, are properly his. Whatsoever then he removes out of the state that nature hath provided, and left it in, he hath mixed his labour with, and joined to it something that is his own, and thereby makes it his property. It being by him removed from the common state nature hath placed it in, it hath by this labour something annexed to it, that excludes the common right of other men: for this labour being the unquestionable property of the labourer, no man but he can have a right to what that is once joined to.”

Beginning with the assumed right to self-ownership, Locke explains that whatever unowned matter an individual directs his labor towards becomes the property of that individual. By implication then, any property that is exchanged for property or money with another individual also becomes the owned property of the new purchaser.

Neglected Property Rights

Although this line of thinking tends to make sense, I have noticed a common situation where people will often blatantly neglect to consider any sort of individual property rights. When one person takes offense at a particular government action, others will often chide this person, saying something along the lines of, “Well, if you don’t like how it is here in this country, you can go live somewhere else.” (For whatever reason, Somalia seems to be the commonly referred place of relocation.)

The primary problem with this line of reasoning is that it completely ignores the individual’s right to his property. Assuming the individual properly purchased or otherwise obtained the land and house that he lives on, why should this person have to give up what is rightful his? If the right to property is a natural right then it would supersede government decree.

Read the rest at freedomandeconomics.org.

Jonathan Wright

Jonathan Wright

View all posts

Our Books

Shop books published by the Libertarian Institute.

libetarian institute longsleeve shirt

Our Books

15 books

Recent Articles

Recent

Tulsi Gabbard, For Better or For Worse

Tulsi Gabbard, For Better or For Worse

When President-elect Donald Trump first nominated former Democratic Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii to serve as director of national intelligence (DNI) in his second administration, many critics of current U.S. foreign policy saw the selection as a step in the...

read more
The Illusion of Wartime Prosperity

The Illusion of Wartime Prosperity

That war is of benefit to the business of voluntary exchange to mutual benefit is, as one of the last British bearers of the classical liberal flame, Norman Angell, remarked in 1909, the great illusion. Certainly there were some industries that gained, such as the...

read more
The Medicare Casino

The Medicare Casino

Is Medicare a good program, financially speaking, for ordinary working people?  Medicare Part A (the part that’s funded by payroll taxes) spent $394.6 billion in 2024 for the approximately sixty million of the over 65-years-of-age Americans on Medicare Part A (about...

read more

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This