Property Rights: The Individual Over the State

by | Oct 3, 2018

Property Rights: The Individual Over the State

by | Oct 3, 2018

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:John_Locke.jpg

Philosophers have often made the claim that individuals have a natural right to property. For example, John Locke wrote:

“Though the earth, and all inferior creatures, be common to all men, yet every man has a property in his own person: this no body has any right to but himself. The labour of his body, and the work of his hands, we may say, are properly his. Whatsoever then he removes out of the state that nature hath provided, and left it in, he hath mixed his labour with, and joined to it something that is his own, and thereby makes it his property. It being by him removed from the common state nature hath placed it in, it hath by this labour something annexed to it, that excludes the common right of other men: for this labour being the unquestionable property of the labourer, no man but he can have a right to what that is once joined to.”

Beginning with the assumed right to self-ownership, Locke explains that whatever unowned matter an individual directs his labor towards becomes the property of that individual. By implication then, any property that is exchanged for property or money with another individual also becomes the owned property of the new purchaser.

Neglected Property Rights

Although this line of thinking tends to make sense, I have noticed a common situation where people will often blatantly neglect to consider any sort of individual property rights. When one person takes offense at a particular government action, others will often chide this person, saying something along the lines of, “Well, if you don’t like how it is here in this country, you can go live somewhere else.” (For whatever reason, Somalia seems to be the commonly referred place of relocation.)

The primary problem with this line of reasoning is that it completely ignores the individual’s right to his property. Assuming the individual properly purchased or otherwise obtained the land and house that he lives on, why should this person have to give up what is rightful his? If the right to property is a natural right then it would supersede government decree.

Read the rest at freedomandeconomics.org.

Our Books

latest book lineup.

Related Articles

Related

TGIF: Spooner versus bin Laden

TGIF: Spooner versus bin Laden

In his 2002 letter to America justifying the savage 9/11 attacks, al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden (himself killed in 2011) wrote after listing his grievances against the U.S. government: You may then dispute that all the above does not justify aggression against...

read more
What Killed the Peace Talks in Ukraine?

What Killed the Peace Talks in Ukraine?

The accepted Western narrative is that, in February 2022, Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine with the intent of conquering the entire country. But there is a competing narrative that is compelling enough to be worthy of consideration. Following the...

read more
America is a Democracy (That’s the Problem)

America is a Democracy (That’s the Problem)

Our rulers constantly talk about “our democracy,” often while justifying doing things which are profoundly anti-democratic. A common midwit response is, “America is not a democracy, it is a republic.” While your ninth grade history teacher may have felt smart telling...

read more
April 20, 2024: Final Nail in America’s Coffin?

April 20, 2024: Final Nail in America’s Coffin?

When future historians go searching for the final nail in the U.S. coffin, they may well settle on the date April 20, 2024. On that day Congress passed legislation to fund two and a half wars, hand what’s left of our privacy over to the CIA and NSA, and give the U.S....

read more