If someone is A) skeptical about climate-change alarmist claims and B) favorable to the use of fossil fuels, why do the media and others automatically assume that B is the cause of A rather than the other way around? This is a form of bigotry: no one can doubt alarmist claims without being either corrupt or anti-science.
Groomer Bot – Short Story
The lights turned on the moment he walked into his house. He stopped and looked to his wife who was smiling. Neville was not a Luddite, just sceptical, “do we really need this?” he asked. Karen smiled, “It’s fun. Besides, it’s the 21st century and we need to keep up.”...