If someone is A) skeptical about climate-change alarmist claims and B) favorable to the use of fossil fuels, why do the media and others automatically assume that B is the cause of A rather than the other way around? This is a form of bigotry: no one can doubt alarmist claims without being either corrupt or anti-science.
The F35 Follies: The Cavalcade of Calamities Continues Part Infinity
So pardon me for a rather technical discussion that points out yet another flaw in the haunted and ridiculously poorly performing F35 program. Why was Shipborne Rolling Vertical Landing (SRVL) EXTREMELY important for the UK carriers? The SRVL capability needs as...