Goodbye DUI: Drinking Alcohol in Self-Driving Cars Could Become Legal

by | Oct 5, 2017

This article originally appeared at Anti-Media. 

 

Australia — As Anti-Media reported in September, governments around the world are beginning to take measures to accommodate for the rise of electric vehicles. Britain, France, India, and Norway have all set deadlines for when to have zero gas-powered cars on their roads, and China is looking into setting one of its own.

Similarly, governments will be forced to craft rules applying to self-driving vehicles once they start becoming standard modes of transportation. It seems Australia recognizes this, as the government has instructed its National Transport Commission (NTC) to look into the matter.

A report from the NTC, released this week, starts from the conclusion that eventually, vehicles controlled by an automated driving system (ADS) will make roads safer because they take human error out of the equation. The NTC writes that Australia’s government would do well to get ahead of the curve:

“The Australian community cannot gain the benefits of automated vehicles, including safety, productivity, environmental, and mobility benefits, unless legislative barriers in transport legislation to the operation of automated vehicles are removed.”

The report has a “problems” section that highlights the difficulties in adapting deeply-rooted legal systems to accommodate emerging technologies — in this case, self-driving cars. The first problem listed by the NTC is most blaringly obvious one:

“Current driving laws and offences assume a human driver.”

And if a human isn’t controlling the vehicle, the NTC asks the Australian government to consider, then how responsible should that human be for what happens while the vehicle is on the road? Not very, the NTC concludes, and this goes for the area of driving under the influence, as well:

“One potential barrier to receiving the full benefits of automated vehicles would be to require occupants of automated vehicles, who are not driving, to comply with drink-driving laws. This would create a barrier to using a vehicle to safely drive home after drinking. Enabling people to use an automated vehicle to drive them home despite having consumed alcohol has the potential to improve road safety outcomes by reducing the incidence of drink-driving.”

The NTC compares the situation to “a person instructing a taxi driver where to go” and concludes that there is “no possibility that a human could drive a dedicated automated vehicle so there is no safety risk associated with drink driving.”

However, the NTC says penalties should be in place for human beings who assume control of self-driving vehicles while intoxicated.

James Holbrooks

James Holbrooks

View all posts

Our Books

Shop books published by the Libertarian Institute.

libetarian institute longsleeve shirt

Support via Amazon Smile

Our Books

libertarian inst books

Recent Articles

Recent

The Culture of Lying and Deceit in the US Army

It's not just the Army and all the services practice this level of institutional cravenness and dishonesty. The article is older but more true over time. The gravest peril of the tacit acceptance of dishonesty, however, is the facilitation of hypocrisy in Army...

read more

Manned Tanks: Stop Building These Things

Arguably one of the best manned tanks ever made, the refurbished M1 Abrams is not faring well in the Ukraine and it is estimated the UKR forces have lost 20 of the 31 tanks supplied to them. This is not only a result of inadequate training, immature doctrine and...

read more

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This