Blog

The Kyle Anzalone Show with Larry Johnson: Midterm, Markets, and Missiles

The scariest part of the U.S.-Iran standoff isn’t the loud headlines. It’s the quiet math of distance, missiles, and leverage at the Strait of Hormuz.

We sit down with Larry Johnson to unpack Iran’s reported “new” framework and why it may be the same core message: lift the U.S. blockade on Iranian ports, and Iran controls access through Hormuz while allowing shipping to move. From there, we get brutally practical about what the U.S. can and cannot do militarily. Carrier strike groups have to operate far offshore to avoid Iranian cruise missiles, ballistic missiles, and drones, which pushes Washington toward standoff weapons like Tomahawks and JASSMs. That sounds clean until you ask the real question: what happens when those stockpiles are running thin and you still want credible deterrence against bigger priorities like China?

We also talk about reports of improving Iranian air defenses, why that could force even more reliance on standoff munitions, and how reputational damage compounds when adversaries see limits in U.S. power projection. On the geopolitical front, we explore Russia and China’s likely role in intelligence support and why diplomacy through intermediaries matters as much as public posturing. And yes, we react to the claim that Iran’s oil system is days from catastrophic pipeline failure, and what it says about the quality of intelligence feeding top decisions.

If you want clear-eyed analysis of the U.S.-Iran conflict, the Strait of Hormuz, sanctions and blockade dynamics, missile stockpiles, and the future of aircraft carriers in modern warfare, hit subscribe, share this with a friend, and leave a review. What’s your read on where this goes next?

The Kyle Anzalone Show with Dave DeCamp: The Ceasefire Is Dying, Israel Waits for Trump’s Greenlight to Restart War

Trump is posting like the Strait of Hormuz is a light switch he controls, but the shipping data, tanker seizures, and oil price spikes point to something far more dangerous: a grinding maritime confrontation that can escalate by accident. We sit down with journalist Dave DeCamp to separate online bravado from real U.S. Navy posture, and to ask what a “ceasefire” even means when a blockade and interdictions continue.

We walk through the competing narratives around Iran’s decision-making and why claims of a divided leadership don’t match the public timeline of conditions, statements, and retaliatory moves. From drone threats to interdictions in the Persian Gulf, the conflict starts to look less like a paused war and more like a shipping war with enormous consequences for global energy markets and everyday gas prices. We also discuss what sustained carrier deployments signal, and why delayed Pentagon injury reporting matters for public accountability.

Then we turn to Israel’s posture, including explicit statements about waiting for a U.S. green light to renew war with Iran and to devastate civilian infrastructure. We also dig into Israel’s Lebanon conduct after a filmed desecration of a Christian statue triggered a PR scramble, and we challenge the “Judeo-Christian alliance” framing by looking at how Christians in Gaza, the West Bank, and the region have been treated amid occupation and war.

If you want clear-eyed analysis of U.S.-Iran tensions, the Strait of Hormuz crisis, Israel’s pressure campaign, and the propaganda that shapes what Americans think they’re seeing, listen now, share it with a friend, and leave a review. What part of this standoff worries you most?

The Kyle Anzalone Show [GUEST] AMB. Chas Freeman: Trump TACO’s Again—Ceasefire Extended, Huckabee Under Fire! – Worst AMB ever?

The Strait of Hormuz is the kind of choke point people talk about in theory, right up until it closes and the whole global economy starts to feel it. We’re joined by Ambassador Chas Freeman, a veteran American diplomat, to make sense of the US-Iran ceasefire drama and the bigger reality underneath it: Iran is not looking for a new ultimatum, and Washington is struggling to offer anything that resembles real negotiations.

We dig into why “maximum pressure” often produces the opposite of its stated goals, including the risk that repeated attacks convince Tehran it needs a nuclear deterrent. We also break down the Strait of Hormuz blockade and why it can fail strategically and legally while still harming allies who rely on Gulf transit. Along the way, we talk oil price whiplash, credibility problems, and the downstream effects that show up weeks later in refineries, inflation, fertilizer, and gas at the pump.

From East Asia blowback to the question of how a Trump-Xi summit would actually play out, the through line is simple: diplomacy is a craft, and the costs of amateur-hour statecraft land on everyone. If you care about US foreign policy, global energy security, and how wars end, this conversation is for you.

The Kyle Anzalone Show [Guest] Larry Johnson: Trump vs. Iran: Is the Ceasefire DOOMED?!

A single image can crack a political storyline wide open. We start with the viral clip of an Israeli soldier smashing a Jesus statue and follow the uncomfortable question it forces for many American Christians: what does “shared values” mean when Christians in Jerusalem report harassment and holy sites face restrictions? With Larry Johnson, we pull apart the gap between religious branding and real-world treatment, and why that gap is changing the tone of U.S. conservative support.

Then the focus turns to the Israel Iran war and the American messaging machine around it. Trump says Israel didn’t drive his decisions, ties escalation to October 7 anyway, and the public narrative gets messy fast. We also react to U.S. officials invoking biblical language to sell confrontation, and we ask what happens to faith when it’s used as a political weapon instead of a moral brake.

From there, we map the escalation timeline: a reported U.S. strike on an Iranian cargo ship, a tightening blockade, sanctions dropped midstream, and confusion around rumored talks in Pakistan as the ceasefire clock runs out. We also dig into the Lebanon front and why it complicates any U.S. Iran deal, before closing with the hard constraints many pundits skip: ground invasion realities, stockpile limits, nuclear-risk rhetoric, and Iran’s hardened underground missile infrastructure that keeps its capability alive.

If this conversation made you think, subscribe, share the episode, and leave a review. What’s the most dangerous lie leaders tell themselves when they push a war?

This Film Shaped Our Very First Impressions of Israel

This Film Shaped Our Very First Impressions of Israel

Alright, you caught me red handed!

I missed last week’s email.

I did, however, spend a solid hour, hour and a half, writing an article about how the film The Prince of Egypt framed 90s kids’ first impressions of Israel.

But I very quickly realized the topic was too complex for a 500 word email article. And constraints on my time just won’t allow for that kind of a deep dive.

Suffice to say, as an all-American, Jesus-loving, Sunday school attending 90s kid, I loved The Prince of Egypt. I was and always have been fascinated with ancient Egypt.

But the film firmly formed my childhood belief that modern Jews are the ancient Israelites (the Palestinians probably are) and that Jews are a particularly oppressed people–just because they’re Jewish, and for no other reason.

Now, that’s just the effect the film had on me. Was that the intended effect? I don’t know.

Upon its release, an Egyptian columnist, Adel Hammouda, called the film “the latest example” of “Israeli misery.”

An Egyptian film director, Hani Lashin, called the film “poisoned honey.” He further said “[the film] contains intentional distortion and works for the benefit of Jews, who claim they built the pyramids. If this is true, why didn’t they build a pyramid after their exodus from Egypt?”

The film’s creators (three American Jews, Steven Spielberg, Jeffrey Katzenberg, and David Geffen) say that they consulted over “300 biblical scholars, theologians, archeologists, Egyptologists, clergy, and religious leaders,” including Muslim leaders, about the project to make sure they’d gotten it right.

And that’s about as far as I got in my research. That’s where it became apparent that to dance any further around the film’s intent vs. its actual effect, I’d have to do a bunch of research.

I simply don’t have the time.

So, I wanted to scrap the entire article.

But revisiting it, a particular lesson jumped out at me—one that could have been included in my eBook Slay Propaganda Like a Lawyer.

Propaganda functions just as much from what we are told vs. what is withheld.

So, I figured I needed to finish this piece in one way shape or form. By not telling it, I was changing my narrative.

Was the film your first introduction to the Israel/Palestine debate? How did it frame your conception of the Middle East as a whole?

Let me know in the comments.

If you enjoyed this piece, please forward it to another 90s kid you know!

This article first appeared as an email to Patrick MacFarlane’s email newsletter.

If you haven’t gotten a copy of “Slay Propaganda” yet, Free Subscribers can download it here, just make sure you’re logged in.

If you aren’t subscribed yet, sign up here to get more posts just like this to your inbox every week and get a copy of that eBook.

The Kyle Anzalone Show [Guest] COL. Lawrence Wilkerson – Did Iran or Trump Cave?

The headlines move fast, but the stakes underneath them move faster. When political leaders say the Strait of Hormuz is “open” and diplomacy is “wrapping up,” we slow the tape and ask the only question that matters: who actually has leverage right now, and what price is being paid off-camera?

We’re joined by Col. Lawrence Wilkerson to unpack Iran’s position in the Strait of Hormuz, why transit fees and control of passage can matter more than press statements, and how “victory” framing can blur the reality of a stalemate. We also dig into a major geopolitical accelerant: China’s growing role and the claim that Iran is receiving high-end satellite intelligence, a shift that could change deterrence, targeting, and escalation risk across the Middle East.

From there, we follow the trail into US military posture and the fear that negotiations can become cover for war preparation, including the movement of major naval assets. Wilkerson raises deeper concerns about presidential decision making capacity, the limits of the 25th Amendment, and what happens when there are no effective guardrails in a national security crisis. We also examine Israel’s influence over US policy, the credibility of competing narratives around Lebanon, and the worst-case scenario if wider targeting disrupts global commerce and pushes the world toward recession, depression, or even nuclear brinkmanship.

Finally, we turn inward to civil-military relations, including the controversy around Pentagon prayer meetings, coercion concerns, and how culture inside the armed forces can shape compliance in a constitutional crisis. If you care about US foreign policy, the Iran Israel conflict, Middle East security, and the real mechanics of power, listen through to the end, then subscribe, share the episode, and leave a review so more people can find the conversation.

Podcasts

scotthortonshow logosq

coi banner sq2@0.5x

liberty weekly thumbnail

Don't Tread on Anyone Logo

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

Pin It on Pinterest