Blog

Fat Amy Can’t Catch a Break

f35$

Fat Amy is a nickname for the F35 Lightning II. As long as an F16 and comparable in weight to a heavy class F15, the F35 isn’t necessarily a light aircraft.

Flying cost per hour may have been reduced to $34,000 per hour. Maybe.

The mission capable rate, the percentage of time during which the aircraft can fly and perform at least one of its tasked missions—and the full mission capable rate—the percentage of time during which the aircraft can perform all of its tasked missions—are key measures of the health and readiness of a military aircraft fleet.

Lockheed-Martin just built the thousandth F35 in January 2024.

These graphs show you two things; first, the full mission capability rate for 2008-2011 production F35s is effectively zero.

Zero.

Second, the Navy and USMC F35B/C variants built between 2012 and 2023 never achieve a full mission capability rate that exceeds 30 percent. Mind you, the maritime environment and structural differences between the variants is a large engineering problem. Keep in mind this is also the first time in recent history the DoD has chosen to make the USAF and the maritime services use the same air-frame.

Take look at these readiness graphs from in Appendix III: U.S. Fleet Mission Capable Rates in a GAO report:

screenshot 2024 06 13 at 16 06 08 gao 23 105341 f 35 aircraft dod and the military services need to reassess the future sustainment strategy gao 23 105341.pdf

screenshot 2024 06 13 at 16 06 24 gao 23 105341 f 35 aircraft dod and the military services need to reassess the future sustainment strategy gao 23 105341.pdf

screenshot 2024 06 13 at 16 06 40 gao 23 105341 f 35 aircraft dod and the military services need to reassess the future sustainment strategy gao 23 105341.pdf

https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-23-105341

My Substack

Email me at cgpodcast@pm.me.

 

Consensual Dueling: Bring Back Single Combat

josh harrison single combat 005

I happen to think that consensual dueling has many positive aspects for civilized societies that would make our lives better.

Politicians especially liked to take part in these martial contests, the possibilities in the contemporary milieu are delightful.

For those who characterize this is as murder/suicide, you’re wrong. Murder begins where self defense ends. Honor is a gift a man gives to himself.

Jane is one of my favorite contemporary commentators on history from a liberty perspective.

Her Pearl Harbor controversy essay was a first rate exposition in the now online Liberty magazine (RIP RW Bradford).

Historians and others have struggled to explain the prevalence of dueling. To begin with, dueling was more prominent in the South, especially after the 1804 duel between Burr and Hamilton. That mortal combat (which took place in New Jersey) seems to have troubled people in the North, and public opinion there turned away from acceptance.

That was not the case in the South, however. So why?

First, the South was simply more violent, some historians say. While dueling per se was conducted among the elite, there was a noticeable tendency toward what historian Troy Kickler calls “wielding of bowie knives and the finger-gouging of eyes” among the more common people. [4] (Don’t even ask me about eye-gouging; you can look it up if you wish.)

Second, during this period, protecting one’s honor helped men distinguish themselves from the people they considered “beneath” them. A gentleman’s “power to command himself as well as others,” writes Harry L. Watson, “set him apart completely from those who allegedly lacked these attributes the most: poor whites, slaves, and women, who were known as the ‘weaker sex.’”[5]

Third, politicians were especially prone to dueling because of the personal nature of politics before the Civil War, says C. A. Harwell Wells.  Furthermore, he writes, “By participating in a duel, specifically a duel with a political opponent, a politician displayed to his followers that he valued his principles more than his life.” [6] 

 

Dueling: A Gentleman’s Duty or a Nasty Habit?

My Substack

Email me at cgpodcast@pm.me.

Up Against The War – Anti-War Blog

In her 1970 book, Up Against The War, Norma Sue Woodstone gives voice to those who refused conscription and campaigned against the US war in South-East Asia. Men who refused the draft were tarred by polite society as being cowards, ‘Draft Dodgers!’ A slur to be thrown against them. Those who begrudgingly went to fight a war that many of them did not understand came home wounded physically or morally to a public that wanted to pretend it all never happened. Millions of South-East Asians die, many continue to do so even generations later as bombs, mines and chemicals randomly take lives or mutilate what remains.

The US government was desperate to push men into uniform so that they could fight in Vietnam or fill the ranks of a military that spanned the globe. The US was to oppose communism, then it was a bi-polar globe with the twin super powers peering down at one another to the point of frequent brinkmanship. Now it’s destiny is to retain the monopolar world of one superpower. Even then, when the Soviet Union was at it’s most exaggerated in power communication occurred. The channels were open. Information was exchanged, envoys met, trade even occurred. There were the boycotts and chilly periods but the Cold Warriors of the 20th century attempted to balance proxy wars with the risk of a nuclear one.

Now the West, led by Washington, wants war with China, Iran, Yemen, Syria, North Korea and Russia. The Taliban send their best wishes. Confidently the world sleepwalks into a catastrophe that seems baffling. The political masters of the past were pricks, blood thirsty mass murderers who saw the map as a playground for death. Though they had a rationale that seemed, at times, logical. In the 21st century it now feels as though cosplayers want to re-enact the last centuries cold war and see what it feels like to add some heat. Though it’s never been a great game, its deadly.

A mother of a dead US soldier once asked, “what if they had a war and nobody turned up?”

There are those who will turn up because they are deluded by the religion of nationism and intoxicated with the honour cult that the military relies upon, others like the pay. There is a belief that constant aggression, forward pressure is the best defence. If Rome continues to expand it’s borders, it will be safe but as it expands its borders it meets new threats and enemies. The frontiers of US and NATO military bases are on their borders, they are the ones who feel threatened and because they are threatened they feel the need to push back. That’s how wars are waged.

“The war was wrong, so I burned by card (draft card),” Andrew Stapp said in Up Against The War. Democracies pretend to like referendums. Should conscription return, what would happen if most refuse? Should the war pigs squeal for more blood what would happen if the people refuse to pay the taxes that feed the beast of death? That is the radicalism of the past, though those radicals have died or like John Kerry who was once a champion for anti-war movements turned into a big government imperialist. Radicalism dies with a mortgage and career. The planet be damned, post-apocalyptic pension plans coming soon.

We can see clips in the Ukraine of males being abducted by government goons, fitted into a uniform, barely trained and forced to a front line so that life or limb may be ripped from them. It’s a war that the US is willing to support to the last Ukrainian boy. Negotiations are off the table. When the Soviets invaded Hungary and Czechoslovakia, both sides still talked. When the US invaded Vietnam and Grenada they talked. And even as the USSR became bogged down in Afghanistan diplomats and leaders still spoke.

It turns out that Steve Gutenberg may have saved the world. After watching the 1983 TV movie The Day After starring a pre Mahoney, Gutenberg, President Reagan picked up the phone and spoke with his Soviet counter part. The dramatic events in the film sickened him, war was not fun and games especially with nuclear weapons. Even at the height of the Cold War between the USA and USSR, the leaders spoke and negotiated. They pulled back from the brinkmanship that only ever makes weapon manufacturers and military careerists rich anyhow. Now the current US retard in chief and the despot of Russia don’t talk, they speak and mumble indirectly at one another through the screen. Communist hating Dick Nixon went to China and shook Mao Tse Tung’s hand. Perhaps the greatest mass murder in human history. But Putin is the next Hitler or something.

In her book, Up Against the War, Woodstone gives us pages of letters from soldiers writing to their family from Vietnam.

Dear Mom and Dad, …I got hit with about 20 pieces of shrapnel from a mine explosion. The mine killed one man and wounded twenty others….We lost another man today, he was accidentally killed by another man in the platoon…

and the other letters from the Government once the soldiers are no longer of use to them…

Dear Mr and Mrs…

It is with great difficulty that I write this letter expressing my deepest sympathy over the loss of your son…

It’s not just the soldiers, but civilians who are ripped to pieces. In a war on a grand scale, like the one Ronald Reagan watched in The Day After, cities full of people are wiped out. And as Steve Gutenberg survives the initial blast, his body succumbs to the sickness of radiation. That’s war. That is the war the world sleep walks towards. In the Cold War and when Up Against the War was written the wider public had a greater awareness of the dangers of nuclear war. Now, it’s brazenly ignored. Because war has never really come home. It’s always those over there dying and suffering, the body bags returning back are few in comparison. Maybe it’s time to be Up Against the War, all of them. Maybe you don’t care, war doesn’t bother you, then again maybe one day it will.

June, 2024

Pentagon: Send More Money!

pentawaste1

You can’t make this up, the scale of incompetence and brain-dead planning on the part of the most expensive military paper tiger in the Earth’s history is breathtaking.

Best of both worlds from a government perspective: huge budgets and no accountability.

The Pentagon failed its sixth audit in a row last month.

But semantics aside, one major reason the Pentagon keeps failing audits is because it can’t keep track of its property. Last year, the Pentagon couldn’t properly account for a whopping 61% of its $3.5 trillion in assets. That figure increased this year, with the department insufficiently documenting 63% of its now $3.8 trillion in assets. Military contractors possess many of these assets, but to an extent unbeknownst to the Pentagon.

Last year, Congress allocated at least $39.5 billion to procure aircrafts, their spare parts, and other equipment, despite not knowing what the government already owned. But insufficient tracking of inventory property doesn’t just increase the risk of overbuying spare parts, it also inhibits the Pentagon from maintaining government property in the possession of contractors. In May, the GAO revealed that in the past five years, Lockheed Martin has lost, damaged, or destroyed over a million spare parts for the F-35 worth over $85 million. The government had visibility into less than 2% of those losses, since it relies on Lockheed to voluntarily report not only what and how much government property it possesses, but also the condition of that property.

https://responsiblestatecraft.org/pentagon-audit-2666415734/

My Substack

Email me at cgpodcast@pm.me.

The Fat Leonard Scandal in the USN: Corruption at the Highest Levels

fatleonard2

Craig Whitlock, author of the incredible The Afghanistan Papers, does a great job revealing just how high and vast the institutional rot is in the DoD.

Craig Whitlock’s book outlines the long story of Leonard Glenn Francis, AKA “Fart Leonard” on the US Navy and the individuals involved through his business dealings in the Western Pacific. He used bribery, fraud, and manipulation to exploit weaknesses in the system and gain favor with high-ranking Navy officials.

The story highlights the culture of corruption and the abuse of power within the Navy. The book also explores the role of individuals who resisted Leonard’s influence and worked to expose his criminal activities. The conversation delves into how Francis exploited senior leaders in the US Navy’s individual and institutional weaknesses and to gain their cooperation and access to classified information to further his business interests as a Husbanding Agent.

The conversation concludes with a brief discussion of the role of Navy JAG officers and federal prosecutors in the case and the current state of the case.

https://cdrsalamander.substack.com/p/fat-leonard-with-craig-whitlock-on?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=247761&post_id=145485106&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=2qx2f&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email

My Substack

Email me at cgpodcast@pm.me.

A Morality of Anger and Guilt

warcemetary

Splendid Memorial Day speech by Matthew Hoh:

The idea of my talk was originally going to be that of the unending costs of war, and I found that to be very daunting for a number of reasons. 

One, I just didn’t know where to begin, what to talk about, what facet of the costs of war, the unending costs of war to emphasize, to talk about. I was terrified of the thought of leaving something out. One, because someone might be like, “Hey, Matt, you forgot that.” So that’s a hit to my ego. But more importantly, what cost of war has more importance than the other, what can have more importance than the other, what needs to be emphasized more than the other, and none of it can be. 

I could have spoken about the remnants of war, the unexploded ordnance and land mines, or to the toxic legacy of war, and whether to speak to the modern or the past or the future of it. In terms of the toxic legacies of war, for example, the hundreds of thousands of Vietnamese, Laotians and Cambodians who gave birth to deformed and dying babies over the last sixty years, something that’s still happening today. Whether I should talk about those overseas or here at home poisoned by war, such as my friend, Dan, who carried a machine gun in Vietnam, came home with Agent Orange in his body and passed it on to his son. And that boy lived some short, terrible years until he died in his mom’s and dad’s arms. 

We can talk about what’s currently occurring and will continue to occur to generations of Iraqi mothers, Afghan mothers, Syrian mothers… and how Ukrainian mothers 40 or 50 years from now will be giving birth to children who are so horribly deformed that we will never, ever, want to see what they look like. 

We can talk about the ongoing costs in the sense of what it costs veterans, the suicides and traumatic brain injuries, and what it costs their families. We can talk about the whole issue of secondary PTSD, how children grow up in homes of war veterans, terrorized by and terrified of their fathers. 

We can talk about the cost to us, as a society. 60% of the discretionary federal budget goes to war and militarism. Add the Pentagon budget to the VA budget and you get 60% of the federal budget. Throw in our wars here at home, throw in federal law enforcement, border security, and prisons, and that’s now 70% of the federal discretionary budget that goes to war and militarism, whether it’s at home or abroad. 

So, of course, this is very daunting. But the reality is, that’s not what I want to talk about. That’s not what I want to speak about. There are stories I want to tell and stories I don’t want to tell. But, because today is Memorial Day, they have to be told. Because if we’re getting to this idea of why we are here, and what is it that we are trying to memorialize…and we’re all trying to avoid the cheapness of [Memorial Day], the political expediency of it, the way it is used by our empire, by our politicians, by our military-industrial complex, by the banks and by the fossil fuel corporations, to continue war and militarism…but aside from that, there are some very real stories that we can never, ever forget. And these are the stories that are not told on Memorial Day. 

I take exception to what was said in the Hillsborough proclamation* about how those who went over there went and expressed the best ideals of this nation. And these two stories I will tell, which I warn you are difficult, are not, by any means, anyone’s best ideals. 

Both these stories come from my time in Iraq as a Marine Corps officer.

The first story is about a Marine I was with named Joseph, who had his head taken off by a suicide bomber on a day that, for the grace of God, none of my Marines were injured or killed. When the casualty officers in the US came to his home and told his wife she ran to the kitchen and tried to slit her wrists open. That’s a story we don’t hear very often on Memorial Day. 

Where are the best ideals of our country located in that? A good man was killed by an enemy we created in a country we invaded based on lies, and his family was ruined for that. That is the cost we must speak of.

These costs, these unending costs…I’ve seen this over and over again, and I will see this again. I know, and I’m certain of it. 

I find it different among men, women and children. It’s a pain; it’s a pain that traps and tortures them forever. But it’s different. In the men, the fathers, the brothers, the husbands, it’s a pain as if something had been stolen from them. There’s a taking that goes on in all this loss. But in the men, it’s as if something has been taken from them without their ability to do anything. So it’s a pain that exists in a deadness in their eyes and a deadness in the soul and a numbness that often turns into self-medication, anger, rage, despondency, isolation… 

Among the women, it’s a pain that I hope to God I never see again. But I know I will. Among the wives and mothers and sisters is a terrible, terrible, excruciating pain that when I come back to those words of how that pain tortures and traps them…it is something that they live with forever because it’s a loss where something is ripped out of them, ripped from them, and they spend their lives feeling that piece of them being torn from them, never ever getting it back. 

The children may be the saddest because among the children, they grow up, and I’ll speak from my experience of their fathers because I did not serve with women who were killed, but I served with men who were killed. Their fathers are not there, and it becomes normalized. That might be the most horrible aspect of it all: these children who grew up with a normalized notion that their fathers were killed in wars overseas for no purpose and that this is their life, without their fathers, and it’s just become acceptable to them. 

The other story is what we did there, and it also touches on pain. In Anbar in ’06 it was difficult, it was bad, very violent. We’d leave our bases to go out, and we’d get into a firefight or an IED attack, or someone would shoot an RPG at us, and the rockets and mortars were fired on us constantly. Most of us were okay because we had our body armor and our vehicle armor, and we were protected in a way that no previous generation of warriors had ever been protected. Certainly, the civilian population did not have that level of protection. So anything that happened to us was magnified by a factor of 100 to the civilians, let alone the insurgency, the resistance we fought. 

But it was bad, and we decided as a command unit, and I raised my hand to this, and it’s something I will live with forever…that the young men who were fighting us, who I had realized were no different than the young men who I had in my command. Of the 153 Marines and Sailors that were with me in Iraq in Anbar Province that year, if they had been young Iraqi men, well, 51 of them would have been fighting us, 51 of them would have been in Abu Ghraib, and 51 of them would have been dead. They were no different than my boys. 

So these boys that we killed on the streets, who were fighting us because we were foreign invaders, they weren’t al Qaeda, they didn’t believe in those jihadist notions, they didn’t believe that somehow there would be 70 Virgins waiting for them. They weren’t dead-enders for Saddam Hussein. They were boys who were fighting us because their country had been invaded. 

When we killed them, we decided, again as a command group, that we would let the dogs eat them on the street rather than allow their families to take their bodies. In Iraq today, there is a mother whose memories of her son are of a dog eating him in the streets of the hometown he was defending from foreign invaders, and it was upon my hand, my decision, along with others, to allow that to happen. I don’t know where, in anyone’s ideals, that is the best stuff, but it is the reality of the American Empire, it is the reality of the American military, and it is the reality of our wars. 

This idea of what are we trying to memorialize? What are we trying to get to? One of the things that I could have spoken about in terms of the costs of war is the cost to our society, the cost to our identity, the cost to our history, to our narrative, who we are; this idea that was so romanticized, so valorized, and these notions that extend whether they’re political, whether through Hollywood, whether through the history books provided in our classrooms, the storytelling, the narrative… it’s mythmaking. It’s mythmaking. And that’s what we advance further wars upon. There’s a perpetuity that goes along with this. Memorial Day, in the way it is celebrated in most of the United States, is no different. We heard it in that Hillsborough proclamation: the best ideals…

For me, the costs are, well, bodily; if it were not for the barbiturates that I’m prescribed, I wouldn’t be standing in front of you right now. Right? If I didn’t take a barbiturate a couple hours ago, I wouldn’t be up on my feet. That’s the bodily cost for the traumatic brain injury I carry. 

The far more important costs of the war, and I say this to share what millions go through whether they’re from the Second World War, the Korean War, from the Vietnam War, from Iraq, Afghanistan, what have you, are the psychological and spiritual costs. At best, I can summarize it like this as I stand here: I am confronted with the reality that the morality I live with, the reality of the morality I live by, is a morality that is constructed upon foundations of anger and guilt with an incessant and eternal need for redemption and atonement, as opposed to a morality that may have been constructed upon compassion and love, or mercy and justice.

You know, as a boy, I was told a man once advised that those who live by the sword shall die by the sword…so, so be it.

It’s this idea of what we’re trying to memorialize that I keep coming back to today. What are we trying to do? We can’t just banish this day. We can’t just abolish Memorial Day because it has been utilized to further war, to further militarism. We can’t just abolish Memorial Day because of the use of it to romanticize warfare, to valorize it.

You know, my great uncle Gabby, he was one of the first people drafted in 1940. He served all those years, and in 1944, he went ashore at Normandy on the second day, not the first, but he was wounded not even two weeks later, advancing towards Calais. Oh, what a great story; this is a man who fought the Nazis…most of the reality, however, is that he lived his life with shrapnel all through his body and the pain of that conflict. He told us how just like in the movie Saving Private Ryan…sometimes these films, Private Ryan being one of the worst of many films that glorify war and sanctify it, romanticize it, make us want to believe that war can be somehow good when it can never be, it can’t be anything other…when Uncle Gabby went ashore, the water there in Normandy, on the second day, was red from the blood of the first. How can you ever walk through that and then ever be normal again? 

When you come home and you’re told you’re a hero, when the reality is you took part in organized murder…you come home, and you go to baseball games, you go to hockey games, and they ask you to stand up, and they all cheer for you, and you’re thinking in your head: all I did was take part in organized murder. Some lady or some man in the store says, “Oh, you’re a veteran, thank you for your service,” and your thoughts to yourself are: I let some dog eat some mother’s son. 

So, as we sit here today, I think of this idea of what we’re trying to do on this day, Memorial Day, because it is an important day. If we do not fight on this day, if we do not push back, if we do not speak truth on this day, then this day will only be utilized to further glorify, further romanticize and further the mythology of good wars. That is a cost too great.

Thank you.

https://matthewhoh.substack.com/p/a-morality-of-anger-and-guilt

My Substack

Email me at cgpodcast@pm.me.

Podcasts

scotthortonshow logosq

coi banner sq2@0.5x

liberty weekly thumbnail

Don't Tread on Anyone Logo

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

Pin It on Pinterest