Blog

Anti-War Blog – The Genocide of Regime Change

Anti-War Blog – The Genocide of Regime Change

There was a study in April, 2024 that showed the IDF attacks between 7th October and 22nd November of 2023 on hospitals, schools and water infrastructure in Gaza were not “random.” The IDF response to the 7th October terrorist attack was absolute. Revenge on a people. Sympathy for the Israeli government concluded, “there needed to be a response.” The Palestinians, most of them youth, were decided as guilty. It had been stated on numerous occasions, because decades earlier they had elected Hamas. There had been no elections since. The Hamas regime needed to go, if the people won’t do it. They will be killed for it.

The terrorist killers of the October attacks, had come from Gaza. Any in that region, thus are ‘understood’ to be guilty, responsible or at least should be killed and punished for the deeds of their familiars. After the September, 2001 attacks on the United States, those responsible had come from the Middle East, mostly Saudi Arabia. This in turn led to the invasion of Iraq, none of the terrorists had come from Iraq, it was in the Middle East. Therefore the response was, understood, justified. Iraq should be punished, the regime of Saddam Hussein to be toppled.

In the wake of the 2001 attacks, the sentiment was that, “they” deserved it. The collective “they” being Muslims, the near Orientals. The brown folk from a particular region. It was the return of the Crusades, a clash of Civilisations. Despite a history of harmony and co-existence, the fundamentalist view was that there is no co-existence. Only revenge, hatred and the imperial ambitions of theology and ideology. Convert or die, Deus Vault!, Jihad! Democracy or Die, etc

The 2023 attacks invoked a similar self-righteous need for revenge. Those who had attacked that October, like those who had attacked in September in 2001, did it with a sense of self-righteousness. Vengeance. Hatred. They had either been wronged, suffered injustice or were motivated by witnessing such. The innocent to be avenged, their innocent. In turn, they would kill the innocent of another group.

“Anyone who tries to destroy our villages and cities, then we are going to destroy their villages and cities. Anyone who steals our fortunes, then we must destroy their economy. Anyone who kills our civilians, then we are going to kill their civilians. “ – Osama Bin Laden, 24th November 2002.

The other thing with the terrorists is you have to take out their families, when you get these terrorists, you have to take out their families. They care about their lives, don’t kid yourself. When they say they don’t care about their lives, you have to take out their families.”Donald Trump, 3rd December, 2015.

The US attacks on Iraq were not limited to military or government facilities. The people of Iraq were punished. The dictator Hussein was captured, then executed. Chaos and carnage savaged the nation. It has still not recovered. The region has since experienced instability, terrorism, war and a decline in the quality of life for those there. It is unhealthy and dangerous for the people in the region, more so than what they had suffered beneath the dictatorship of Hussein. Such is regime change.

Numerous media outlets have reported that around 377,000 Gazans have “disappeared,” since 7th October, 2023. Likely dead. The victims of a policy that is genocide. A widespread punishment of the people in the region. The call for regime change or that the innocent are killed because Hamas are using them as shields, or unintentionally during the fighting, has been countless times proven false. It continues on as an intentional mass murder campaign. The goal is regime change, to remove Hamas. It’s also collective punishment and the intentional removal, replacement and expulsion of the people from the region. Extermination included.

After spending his first few decades as the pariah mastermind of much the world’s terrorism, the self proclaimed anti-colonist Qaddafi of Libya transformed himself into a senior statesman. Mellowing to a degree in the late 1990s and into the 2000s, he no longer had ambitions of possessing weapons of mass destruction or supporting revolutionaries, AKA terrorists. Instead, along with his sons he was looking to transform Libya into a modern and more liberal nation. He was a tyrant, a rapist, torturer and oppressor. What followed was terrifying for Libya. Qaddafi was regime changed in the aftermath of the Arab spring in 2011.

Libya fell into carnage. Slavery and mass rapes savaged the nation. Life beneath the tyrant seemingly far more beneficial than the war and misery of modern Libya. War lords and murder pirates directly and indirectly supported by the Western nations rule with unstable injustice. Thousands have died since.

Then there is carnage inflicted on Afghanistan, Lebanon, Yemen or Syria and the many other victims of foreign policy as it is expressed by the exceptional nations. The victims of war and policy are insignificant and never considered by the executioners of such policies. The victims are not even counted properly. It will take decades to calculate just how many are actually dead. Unmarked graves, lost bones in the desert and the refugees who have fled, make it hard for those who count the dead to ever know. The missing are grieved all the same.

The US along with it’s ally, Israel have attacked Iran. For the US, it’s claimed, the goal was to destroy the regimes ability to produce nuclear WMD’s. For the nuclear WMD armed Israel the goal seems to be regime change. The claim that Iran has been or is, producing “nukes” comes from the same unreliable sources. Them being those who use their claims to justify their attacks. For them and the powerless, that is enough to validate attacks on Iran and turn them into the present pariah nation. The population of Iran, to suffer.

From his book, Night of Power – The Betrayal of the Middle East, Robert Fisk shares a testimony from an official in the Anglo-US Iraq Survey Group, tasked with finding Iraq’s WMD’s,

We used to go to the interrogation rooms at Abu Ghrahib and ask for a particular prisoner. After about forty minutes, the Americans brought in this hooded guy, shuffling along, shackled hand and foot. He had a big beard. We asked where he received his education. He repeatedly said: ‘Mosul’. Then he said he’d left school at fourteen – remember, this guy is supposed to be a missile scientist. We said; ‘We know you’ve got a PhD and went to the Sorbonne – we’d like you to help us with information about Saddam’s missile project.’ But I said to myself: “This guy doesn’t know anything about fucking missiles.” Then it turned out he had a different name from the man we’d asked for – he’d been picked up on the road four months earlier – he didn’t know why…It was a complete farce. The incompetence of the US military was astounding, criminal.”

Executions of officials and suspects continued under these conditions. The prior regime of Saddam Hussein had been a vile example of might is right. For the people of Iraq, the might was all the more reckless and violent in the decades that followed.

That is the nature of the evidence raised against Iran now. The validity and credibility comes from power itself. No evidence is needed. The enemy exists to validate power. Those, them, they, the different, the oriental are viewed as or, treated like they are not human beings. It is an exceptional outlook, chauvinism of the mighty. There is no opposition that can argue with any reason, expose the hypocrisy or seek a rationale. It’s religion, a belief in their absolute might, that is what makes them right. The Weapons of Mass Destruction have been found long ago, they keep getting elected time and time again.

Trump Bombs Iran: Bovard’s First Penalty Flags

And a few hours before Trump formally entered the war against Iran…

UTOPYC: A Realistic Libertarian Utopia

UTOPYC: A Realistic Libertarian Utopia

What if there were a country with no state, no taxes, no politicians, and no public institutions? That’s the premise of Utopyc, a novel that answers the need—long identified by Rothbard—for a libertarian narrative capable of moving, convincing, and inspiring.

The protagonist, Gabriel Dan, is a journalist who discovers the existence of Utopyc, a small country where everything public has been entirely abolished, and society is organized through private contracts, voluntary agreements, and cooperation without coercion. Coming from our own dystopian world, Dan travels to investigate and is soon surprised to find that unrestricted liberty does not lead to chaos, but to harmony.

Through the journalist’s eyes, readers visit hospitals, schools, courts, security systems, defense services, and even media outlets—all functioning without any state intervention. Along the way, he also discovers a new kind of humanism that reclaims the dignity of the free individual.

Utopyc is not fantasy or theory, but a narrative and realistic representation of how a truly libertarian world might function. Readers see how liberty gives shape to a more prosperous, peaceful, and humane society. This imagined country includes places like the Museum of Liberty and the Museum of Beauty, showcasing the cultural richness of a society without coercion—and the birth of a new humanism.

For centuries, utopia has been monopolized by collectivist thinking. This novel shows that only a stateless society can truly be utopian. If you were moved by Atlas Shrugged or The FountainheadUtopyc may be your next must-read.

You can also explore other related titles at http://www.utopyc.net/ such as Do You Like Being a Slave?, a powerful critique of the current Western political status quo from a libertarian perspective, and Cold Monster, a dystopian take on the immediate future of the West.

The paperback edition of Utopyc is available at Amazon and the book’s website.

I would love for the readers of the Libertarian Institute to enjoy this unprecedented journey to the land of the libertarians. Only when liberty is seen in action can one truly grasp the magnitude and dignity of this fight.

Celebrate Juneteenth the Right Way

rexjuneteenth
Today is Juneteenth.
 
I celebrate the lethal electrocution of two communist spies on this day in 1953; Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, an American couple, were executed for their espionage service to Stalin and the USSR
 
They became good communists on that day.

The “Least Performing” Circus Continues at the US Navy (and Elsewhere)

stacks of hundred us dollars. 3d illustration

***Have been out of pocket for conference attendance***

The US Navy and the Pentagon continue the grand sclerotic and arthritic three ring circus of staggering inabilities to deliver any exquisite platforms on time, on budget and within scope. The sterling track record of bumbling an incompetence at the galactic level continues to amaze observers around eh world.

For decades, mountains of red tape have stifled innovation and slowed the defense industrial base’s ability to respond to emerging global threats and even basic requirements.

  • The new Air Force One is now five years behind schedule, delayed until 2029 or later, despite the contract being awarded in 2018.
  • Nine Navy ship programs (not just individual ships, but the entire procurement program) are between one and three years behind schedule.
  • The first flight of the Air Force’s new ICBM, the Sentinel, is already two years behind schedule and 37% more expensive than originally promised.
  • The nuclear-powered aircraft carrier USS John C. Stennis is in port for a scheduled overhaul and refueling stint—work that normally takes four years to complete—yet the carrier now won’t be ready for at least another year, marking over five years out of service.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/04/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-modernizes-defense-acquisitions-and-spurs-innovation-in-the-defense-industrial-base/

The disaster continues apace.

The report was sent to the four congressional defense committees in mid-January. Navy Secretary John Phelan will begin his fiscal 2026 budget testimony Wednesday before the House defense appropriations subcommittee. 

A Navy spokesman couldn’t provide more details on why the five systems were listed as low performers, citing the reasons as “controlled unclassified information.”

Systems listed as meeting their goals, or best performing, were the AN/SPY-6 air and missile defense radar for Aegis destroyers, the MQ-4C Triton surveillance drone, KC-130J transport and E-2D Advanced Hawkeye surveillance aircraft.

The hapless Constellation frigate program joins a host of underperformed and acquisition disasters that march in glory with the US Navy unblezihe track record since 1991 of ship-building acquisition disasters.

Aside from the frigate, the list of low performers cited in the report includes General Atomics’ Advanced Arresting Gear or AAG installed on the Navy’s newest aircraft carrier, and Northrop Grumman Corp’s new extended range anti-radar missile.

A GA spokesperson said the Navy would respond for comment. A Northrop Grumman spokesperson referred comment to the Navy.

Meanwhile, the program manager of Boeing Co.’s unmanned MQ-25 Stingray drone designed to refuel Navy jets, which was also named in the report, said the company has owned its challenges. The program’s initial production has been delayed by at least two years because of issues with some of the aircraft’s design and manufacturing process, according to a Pentagon assessment.

“We are on track for our first flight later this year,” said Troy Rutherford, Boeing’s vice president for the program.

Another low performer listed in the report is Textron Inc.’s “Ship To Shore” Marine Corps hovercraft, which has had previous propeller blade and gearbox issues.

Ryan Schaffernocker, senior vice president for marine systems at Textron, said in a statement: “Our team and suppliers based across the US have established an efficient production line that has delivered 13 craft with 14 more in production or test.”

Frigate Touted By Trump Is Among Navy’s ‘Least Performing’ Programs

 

Be Careful What You Ask for

You wanted America First. You got it.

Did you think it wouldn’t be conceived in national collectivist terms?

The clue’s in the name. It’s America First, not Americans First.

Phony Noninterventionists

Call me naive, but I increasingly suspect that much of today’s “left” is not antiwar on principle. Rather, it’s anti-American war because, in its view, America (not just the government) is rotten to the core: bourgeois, racist, patriarchal, heteronormative, blah, blah, blah. If left-wingers (Marxists, heavy or light) were in charge, they’d likely support foreign intervention under the right conditions, e.g., fighting apartheid in South Africa (which indeed was bad) or Pinochet (also bad) in Chile, or saving Maduro (bad too) from a middle-class uprising in Venezuela. In the 1960s and 70s the so-called radical left favored the communists in the Vietnam War. It was not just against U.S. intervention, as many libertarians were. In the 1970s Noam Chomsky supported Vietnam’s intervention in Cambodia; he also favored leaving some U.S. troops in Syria. I note that Max Blumenthal has lately called for intervention against Israel (bad). (By whom I don’t know.)

If the left is interventionist at home, then why wouldn’t it also be interventionist abroad? It has no principled objection to government power. It just wants aggressive force put to “good” use, such as managing other people’s peaceful market relations.

Libertarians are the only comprehensive noninterventionists. The “left” may want the libertarians to tag along to demonstrate that its opposition to the U.S. empire is broad-based. That would make libertarians its useful idiots. I prefer another role, as antiwar libertarians. But deep down, the “left” likely thinks the libertarians are knowing or misguided shills for what they disdainfully call “corporate America”—which they are not. The goal is freedom.

Maybe we libertarians should be called Compnons.

Podcasts

scotthortonshow logosq

coi banner sq2@0.5x

liberty weekly thumbnail

Don't Tread on Anyone Logo

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

Pin It on Pinterest