It’s Summer Fundraising Time!

Thank you to all our generous donors who have already contributed to our cause; your support makes a tremendous impact. If you haven’t yet, please consider making a donation today to help us continue our vital work.

$3,320 of $60,000 raised

If The US Used Arbitration Instead Of War

by | Jun 7, 2017

I previously discussed why I believe that the American revolution is only half-complete.  In my opinion, a government consistent with the principles and premises of the American revolution would not have the constitutional right to go to war.  Such a government would also not be authorized to treat any foreign persons in any manner except one which is consistent with the normal constitutional protections granted to citizens.

How would such a government defend the rights of its citizens abroad, or redress grievances with foreign powers?  The answer is arbitration.

A traditional European state could go to war, or else negotiate on behalf of its subjects.  However, my theoretical “complete” American government would not be in a position to arbitrarily bargain concerning the fate of its citizens.

If a foreign entity committed a crime against an American citizen, then that entity’s guilt would be precisely determined by the system of law extant in America.  The hypothetical American government here is not in the position of the sovereign of a Euro state – it can’t simply bargain for its prerogatives which may or may not reflect the outcomes of domestic legal processes.  This American government’s only constitutional option is to try and convince foreign powers to accept the legitimacy of American legal outcomes, possibly the activities of American foreign agents executing the law abroad such as they would domestically, or at least find some common legal standard to resolve the dispute in question.

There is no bargaining over outcomes, but instead over processes.  The mode of arbitration (for example the judges in question) can be selected specifically with outcomes in mind, but the purpose of arbitration is to take two dissonant legal systems of two foreign powers and to harmonize them.  In this, neither state’s prerogative is being asserted, or if it is it is brought under the contextual umbrella of that state’s existing legal norms.  When we speak of liberal government, reflective of American revolutionary principles, we speak of the rule of law trumping the rule of men.

By using arbitration, a government such as America’s could act in the international realm in a manner more consistent with how it acts in the domestic realm.  The principle, “all men are endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights,” can exist above and beyond the scope of the American state, rather than be subordinate to it.

Nevertheless, this only answers the very basic procedural question of how a “1776” style government would deal with international disputes in contrast to the traditional European/Westphalian manner.  Tomorrow I will address whether this procedure would be effective, realistic, or competitive in the real world of international disputes.

Zack Sorenson

Zack Sorenson

Zachary Sorenson was a captain in the United States Air Force before quitting because of a principled opposition to war. He received a MBA from Waseda University in Tokyo, Japan as class valedictorian. He also has a BA in Economics and a BS in Computer Science.

View all posts

Our Books

libertarian inst books

Related Articles

Related

Assassin Murders Bystander

Assassin Murders Bystander

  Twenty Year old Thomas Mathew Crooks murdered a bystander and injured others in an attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump. Trump suffered, a bullet injuring his ear. The killer was shot dead by a secret service counter sniper. The crowd...

read more

Kyle Anzalone on Judge Nap: The Hannibal Directive

Check out Kyle’s latest appearance on Judge Napolitano’s show, ‘Judging Freedom,’ where they discuss recent reporting by Haaretz suggesting Israel's military repeatedly invoked the infamous 'Hannibal Directive' during Hamas' October 7 attack. The Hannibal policy calls...

read more

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This