The Moral and Economic Case for Free Markets. Art Carden and Keith Knight

by | Mar 21, 2021

“… there are two and only two ways of attaining wealth in society: (a) by production and voluntary exchange with others — the method of the free market; and (b) by violent expropriation of the wealth produced by others. The latter is the method of violence and theft. The former benefits all parties involved; the latter parasitically benefits the looting group or class at the expense of the looted.”


Murray N. Rothbard 

Ethics of Liberty, pp. 166–67

Art Carden is a professor of economics at the Brock School of Business at Samford University.

Buy Leave Me Alone and I’ll Make You Rich here: 


0:00 – Quote

1:07 – Why some countries are wealthy and others are impoverished, “The Great Enrichment”

4:18 – Do free markets breed exploitation of the weak by the strong? 

6:16 – How to measure wealth or standard of living?

7:50 – Free markets = materialism

10:13 – The innovation double standard 

12:32 – “Freedom means not caring about the long term results of your actions”

16:00 – “Slavery and colonialism caused the west to grow rich”

20:32 – Who protects the workers?

22:32 – Who protects the consumer?

26:38 – The moral difference between the state and the free market 

29:51 – Criticisms of the free market THAT ARE UNIQUE to the free market

32:12 – Best lessons from Adam Smith





About Keith Knight

Keith Knight is Managing Editor at the Libertarian Institute, host of the Don't Tread on Anyone podcast and editor of The Voluntaryist Handbook: A Collection of Essays, Excerpts, and Quotes.

Our Books


Related Articles


AntiWar Alliance: The Dissident Left & Libertarians

AntiWar Alliance: The Dissident Left & Libertarians To kill one man is to be guilty of a capital crime, to kill ten men is to increase the guilt tenfold, to kill a hundred men is to increase it a hundredfold. This the rulers of the earth all recognize, and yet when it comes to the greatest...

read more
A Lawyer Explains “The Myth of the Rule of Law”

A Lawyer Explains “The Myth of the Rule of Law” I refer to the myth of the rule of law because, to the extent that this phrase suggests a society in which all are governed by neutral rules that are objectively applied by judges, there is no such thing. As a myth, however, the concept of...

read more

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This