A Libertarian Theory of Contract Ep. 88

by | Aug 12, 2018

Audio Only Version

In this scholarly episode of the podcast, I explain how a post from The Principled Libertarian led me down a rabbithole where I discovered the libertarian “Title Theory” of contracts. I explain, then compare and contrast, the orthodox consideration-based contract theory with the libertarian title-based theory.

Subscribe to the Liberty Weekly Podcast:
iTunes
Stitcher
Google Play Music

Please Consider Supporting Projects on DonorSee

Episode 88 of the Liberty Weekly Podcast is Brought to you by:

The Liberty Weekly Amazon Affiliate Link

The Liberty Weekly Patreon Page: help support the show and gain access to tons of bonus content! Become a patron today!

Become a Patron!

Our Nord VPN Affiliate Link

Our Liberty Classroom Affiliate Link

Show Notes:

Walter Block discusses Murray Rothbard, Hans Hoppe, and John Locke’s theory of property

Liberty Weekly and the Constitution of No Authority Ep. 28

Foundations of Real Property Law: Present and Concurrent Estates Ep. 76

“The Ethics of Liberty” by: Murray Rothbard (Chapter 19)

A Libertarian Theory of Contract: Title Transfer, Binding Promises, Inalienability by: Stephan Kinsella

Barbri Contracts Outline

Patrick Macfarlane

Patrick Macfarlane

Patrick MacFarlane is the Justin Raimondo Fellow at the Libertarian Institute where he advocates a noninterventionist foreign policy. He is a Wisconsin attorney in private practice. He is the host of the Vital Dissent at www.vitaldissent.com, where he seeks to oppose calamitous escalation in US foreign policy by exposing establishment narratives with well-researched documentary content and insightful guest interviews. His work has appeared on antiwar.com, GlobalResearch.ca, and Zerohedge. He may be reached at patrick.macfarlane@libertyweekly.net

View all posts

Listen to Vital Dissent with Patrick MacFarlane

Recent Articles

Recent

Whose ‘NAP’ Anyway?

Whose ‘NAP’ Anyway?

A considerable portion of libertarian infighting seems to stem from the largely unrecognized fact that there are two different ways to interpret the non-aggression principle (NAP). On the surface, the NAP seems clear: aggression is wrong. But there is a deontological...

read more
A Libertarian Argument for Single Combat

A Libertarian Argument for Single Combat

Representation permeates much of life in the modern liberal state. Politicians make laws for millions of people, laws that every individual is expected to obey under the threat of force. Bureaucracies ensure compliance with these laws through varying forms of...

read more

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This