Click Here for Audio Only
The Supreme Court handed down a very dissatisfying ruling in the Masterpiece case on Monday, holding in a 7-2 opinion that: “[t]he Colorado Civil Rights Commission’s actions in assessing a cakeshop owner’s reasons for declining to make a cake for a same-sex couple’s wedding celebration violated the free exercise clause.” This ruling, which was narrow in scope, failed to decide the fundamental issue in the case, which had more to do with compelled speech than free exercise. Of course, we libertarians understand that the real fundamental issue here is property rights, and neither compelled speech nor free exercise.
DonorSee:
Help Jessie Schwartz start a women’s shelter in Uganda! Remember to comment in DonorSee if you contribute and I will give you a shout-out!
Episode 80 of the Liberty Weekly Podcast is Brought to you by:
The Liberty Weekly Amazon Affiliate Link
The Liberty Weekly Patreon Page: help support the show and gain access to tons of bonus content! Become a patron today!
Become a Patron!
Our Nord VPN Affiliate Link
Our Liberty Classroom Affiliate Link
Show Notes:
SCOTUSblog: Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission
Opinion analysis: Court rules (narrowly) for baker in same-sex-wedding-cake case [Updated]
The SCOTUS Decision
Masterpiece’s Reply Brief
Symposium: Anti-discrimination laws do not compel commercial-merchant speech (an opposing view)
TGIF: The Worst Are Already on Top
After Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem made a fool of herself by defining habeas corpus as "a constitutional right that the president has to be able to remove people from this country," Justin Amash, the libertarian former congressman, posted an apt quotation...
