James Madison’s Instruction: Throw a Fit!

by | Aug 23, 2018

James Madison’s Instruction: Throw a Fit!

by | Aug 23, 2018

Wiki Commons

What should the average person do when the federal government oversteps its constitutional bounds?

Throw a fit!

That’s what James Madison recommended when he laid out a blueprint for dealing with unconstitutional federal acts in Federalist #46. He wrote that when the federal government enacts an “unwarrantable measure,” or even a “warrantable measure” that happens to be unpopular, “the means of opposition to it are powerful and at hand.” One of those means of opposition involves “the disquietude of the people.”

In other words, when the federal government does things outside of its authority people should throw a fit and throw it loudly. In fact, Madison said the people should show “repugnance” toward those actions. This puts pressure on federal officials to back off from their unconstitutional actions. Combined with “a refusal to cooperate with officers of the union,” Madison suggested this approach would place impediments and obstructions in front of the federal government. After all, no politician wants to face an angry crowd – especially an angry crowd of his people he thinks supports him.

But instead of throwing a fit, far too many people rationalize and make excuses when “their guy” (or gal) violates the Constitution.

I’m seeing a lot of excuse-making out of Republicans lately.

For instance, one Trump supporter told me I shouldn’t oppose the president’s proposal to give $12 billion to farmers based on an unconstitutional Depression-era “law” signed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt because “I need to look at the bigger picture.” After all, the subsidies will help Trump win the trade war. Another Republican claimed we shouldn’t blame Trump for dropping 44,000 bombs in his first term without a declaration of war because “he inherited the war.” And when it comes to Trump ramping up federal enforcement of unconstitutional gun laws, I shouldn’t criticize the president. “If you disagree with the gun laws, do what you can to change it, but don’t undermine the entire system to serve a personal interest.”

I can list plenty of other unconstitutional actions since the Republicans essentially took control of all three branches of the federal government. The drug war rages on. Obamacare remains the law of the land. Jeff Sessions sent out a memo directing federal prosecutors to ramp up asset forfeiture.

Read the rest at tenthamendmentcenter.com.

Michael Maharrey

Michael Maharrey [send him email] is the communications director for the Tenth Amendment Center. He also runs GodArchy.org, a site exploring the intersection of Christianity and politics. Michael is the author of the book, Constitution Owner's Manual: The Real Constitution the Politicians Don't Want You to Know About. You can visit his personal website at MichaelMaharrey.com, like him on Facebook HERE and follow him on Twitter @MMaharrey10th.

View all posts

Our Books

Shop books published by the Libertarian Institute.

Podcasts

scotthortonshow logosq

coi banner sq2@0.5x

liberty weekly thumbnail

Don't Tread on Anyone Logo

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

Our Books

Recent Articles

Recent

The Allies Could Have Done More, and Chose Not To

The Allies Could Have Done More, and Chose Not To

Over the last year, a renewed controversy has arisen over the morality of World War II. For the last eighty years, World War II has been sold in the West as "The Good War" in which the United Kingdom and the United States, in spite of committing some war crimes, saved...

read more
Answering Ron Paul’s ‘What If…’ Speech

Answering Ron Paul’s ‘What If…’ Speech

On February 12, 2009, Dr. Ron Paul (R-TX) delivered one of his most striking speeches on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives. Since referred to as the “What If…” speech, Paul’s remarks offer a precise distillation of the libertarian critique of U.S. foreign...

read more
TGIF: Trump and the Separation of Powers

TGIF: Trump and the Separation of Powers

The U.S. Court of Appeals' rejection last week of the Trump administration's global "emergency" tariff program was a welcome affirmation of the separation-of-powers doctrine. Next stop: the U.S. Supreme Court. I'm keeping my fingers crossed for a 9-0 ruling that Trump...

read more

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This