Why Bin Laden Has Won

by | Jan 10, 2020

Iraq’s infrastructure is broken.  China is making them a deal: they’ll help rebuild it, in exchange for some oil.

Why is it that the totalitarian communist empire is making friends and money through commercial development and cooperation?  How come the “liberal” and “free society” republic is trying to maintain its command authority through a boot on the face?

The boot on the face is why Bin Laden hated the US Empire, more than anything else.  His goal was to cut through the crap and show the Islamic World that the US might promise commercial friendship, but what it really delivers is the boot.  This is ironic.  China might someday become just as happy to land boots on faces as the US or anyone else.  China’s doing it right now, against Uighur Muslims, for goodness’ sake.

The US could have reacted to 9/11 in a measured way.  We had an opportunity to prove to the world that we’re reasonable, leverage their sympathy, continue the good commercial cooperation.  But our sick sick institutions took the bait and launched the boot.  The weaker the US becomes, the more of a scapegoat it will become.  How many generations until people in the Middle East will move on from mistrusting America?

Bin Laden had a belief – in his view American power was no angel, it was a demon.  Not everyone agreed.  So he placed a bet, and the demon – not the angel – awoke.

The US had a chance to prove Bin Laden wrong but we failed.  This is where we are now.

Zack Sorenson

Zack Sorenson

Zachary Sorenson was a captain in the United States Air Force before quitting because of a principled opposition to war. He received a MBA from Waseda University in Tokyo, Japan as class valedictorian. He also has a BA in Economics and a BS in Computer Science.

View all posts

Our Books

Shop books published by the Libertarian Institute.

libetarian institute longsleeve shirt

Our Books

15 books

Recent Articles

Recent

Who Needs What?

"[I]t is evident ... that the man, who first made himself clothes and built himself a cabin, supplied himself with things which he did not much want, since he had lived without them till then; and why should he not have been able to support in his riper years, the...

read more

Whose Plan?

"The alternative is not plan or no plan. The question is whose planning? Should each member of society plan for himself, or should a benevolent government alone plan for them all? The issue is not automatism versus conscious action; it is autonomous action of each...

read more

What Full Liberalism Is Not About

"Liberalism is a doctrine directed entirely towards the conduct of men in this world. In the last analysis, it has nothing else in view than the advancement of their outward, material welfare and does not concern itself directly with their inner, spiritual and...

read more

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This