Senator Bob Graham, 9/11, and the Mirage of American Democracy

by | Apr 22, 2024

Senator Bob Graham, 9/11, and the Mirage of American Democracy

by | Apr 22, 2024

ksc 97pc1763 43c6ab 1024

Former Senator Bob Graham passed away on April 16 at the age of 87. Graham had been one of the most outspoken opponents of the Iraq War, but his brightest legacy was his perennial fight against the George W. Bush administration’s cover-up of the 9/11 attacks.

Graham was chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee when terrorists toppled the World Trade Center towers. When President Bush whipped up support for war by blaming the 9/11 attacks on Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein, Graham recognized the scam. In October 2002, when Bush rammed a pro-war resolution (though not a formal declaration of war) through Congress, Graham objected that another war in the Middle East would obscure the real perils: “If you believe that the American people are not going to be at additional threat, then, frankly, my friends—to use a blunt term—blood is going to be on your hands.”

After the 9/11 attacks, Bush and the political-media elite masterminded a tide of servility; flag waving and patriotic appeals swept the land and polls showed a doubling in the number of people who trusted government to “do the right thing.” The national media rallied to the cause with headlines such as “The Government, Once Scorned, Becomes Savior” (Los Angeles Times), “Government to the Rescue” (Wall Street Journal), and “Government’s Comeback” (Washington Post). The government failed—so the government became infallible.

But not for Senator Graham. Working with the House Intelligence Committee, he led an investigation that revealed far more failures and frauds than the Bush White House ever admitted.

The congressional Joint Inquiry Into Intelligence Community Activities Before and After the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001 completed its investigation in December 2002. But the Bush administration stonewalled the release of the 838-page report until mid 2003—after its invasion of Iraq was a fait accompli—and totally suppressed a key 28-page portion. A Washington Post obituary noted that the work of Graham’s Joint Intelligence Committee was “largely overshadowed by the independent 9/11 Commission.” This is because bootlicking is far more popular with the Washington elite than honest criticisms.

Almost everyone has forgotten how hard the Bush administration fought to torpedo that report. Graham bitterly complained, “There’s been a pattern in which information is provided on a classified basis, and then what is declassified are those sections of the report that are most advantageous to the administration.”

Some intelligence officials even insisted on “reclassifying” as secret some of the information that had already been discussed in public hearings, such as the FBI Phoenix Memo. On May 13, 2003, Senator Graham accused the Bush administration of engaging in a “cover-up” and said that the report from the congressional investigation “has not been released because it is, frankly, embarrassing…embarrassing as to what happened before September 11th, but maybe even more so the fact that the lessons of September 11th are not being applied today to reduce the vulnerability of the American people.” Senator Trent Lott (R-MS) complained that intelligence agencies sought to totally censor the report: “The initial thing that came back was absolutely an insult, and it would be laughable if it wasn’t so insulting, because they redacted half of what we had. A lot of it was to redact a word that revealed nothing.”

When the bulk of the report was finally released, Senator Richard Shelby (R-AL) added an additional opinion in which he castigated “the FBI’s dismal recent history of disorganization and institutional incompetence in its national-security work.” The congressional report was far blunter than the subsequent 9/11 Commission. The congressional investigation concluded that the FBI’s “mixed record of attention contributed to the United States becoming, in effect, a sanctuary for radical terrorists.” But the Bush administration stonewalled the most damaging revelations on the Saudi government financing the hijackers. Disclosing Saudi links to 9/11 could have undermined efforts by some Bush administration officials to tie Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein to the 9/11 attacks. Senator Shelby objected to the suppression of the 28-pages: “The American people are crying out to know more about who funds, aids, and abets terrorist activities in the world.” Forty-six senators, spearheaded by Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and including almost all the Democratic members, signed a letter to President George W. Bush urging the release of the 28-pages. No such luck.

Graham continued pushing to declassify those 28-pages after he left the Senate. In 2015, he declared that “there is compelling evidence in the 28-pages that one or more foreign governments was involved in assisting some of the hijackers in their preparation for 9/11.”

When those pages were finally declassified and released in 2016, they provided another neon light example of how the Bush administration had lied the nation into the Iraq War. There was no formal response in Washington to update Lincoln’s famous adage to tout “government of the people, by the people, and for the Saudis.”

In a radio interview on WBUR in September 2016, Graham castigated the continuing coverup of other 9/11 bombshells: “I describe [the 28 pages of congressional report] as the cork in the bottle, and now we need to pour out the information that I think would’ve been unavailable before the 28-pages were released but now are available, and that follow-up information to the leads that were first encountered in the 28-pages. We need the full information in order to make an informed and final judgment as to the role of Saudi Arabia in 9/11.”

Unfortunately, President Joe Biden is continuing that coverup as the Justice Department continues fighting against disclosures of foreign government finagling.

Graham’s courage in exposing federal failures was rare in Washington. But self-government is an illusion if politicians can shroud the most important details driving federal policy. As Attorney General Ramsey Clark warned in 1967, “Nothing so diminishes democracy as secrecy.”

About Jim Bovard

Jim Bovard is a Senior Fellow for the Libertarian Institute and author of the newly published, Last Rights: The Death of American Liberty (2023). His other books include Public Policy Hooligan (2012), Attention Deficit Democracy (2006), Lost Rights: The Destruction of American Liberty (1994), and seven others. He is a member of the USA Today Board of Contributors and has also written for The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Playboy, The Washington Post, among others. His articles have been publicly denounced by the chief of the FBI, the Postmaster General, the Secretary of HUD, and the heads of the DEA, FEMA, and EEOC and numerous federal agencies.

Our Books

latest book lineup.

Related Articles

Related

TGIF: Another Bogus Antisemitism Scare

TGIF: Another Bogus Antisemitism Scare

I've been watching and thinking about the nationwide campus antiwar demonstrations in support of the suffering Palestinians of Gaza, and the appalling reaction to and "coverage" of those events. Something important needs to be addressed. I won't be concerned here with...

read more
Troops on the Ground: Biden’s Plan for Ukraine

Troops on the Ground: Biden’s Plan for Ukraine

Despite billions of dollars of military aid, equipment maintenance, training, intelligence, and planning from the United States and its partners in the political West, the war in Ukraine is going very badly. The Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine,...

read more
Conservatives Against ‘Hate Speech’

Conservatives Against ‘Hate Speech’

It's pretty sad watching conservatives argue like leftists, but it's all over the place now. Not so long ago they rightly ridiculed and dismissed the idea of "hate speech," but now that "anti-Semitism" is said to be the problem, all of a sudden the idea of hate speech...

read more
The Creature From Palestine

The Creature From Palestine

The state is a monster that eats itself, along with individuals within its domain, its spheres of influence, and beyond. Citizens typically don’t perceive this due to the crafty rhetoric generated by the state’s intellectuals. Sometimes the rhetorical machinery breaks...

read more