Trump Administration Needlessly Provoking Iran

by | Feb 6, 2017

Trump Administration Needlessly Provoking Iran

by | Feb 6, 2017

The following article was originally published by the author on Medium.

Barely two weeks after Trump’s inauguration, his administration is already laying the groundwork for what could become a dangerous military confrontation with Iran.

On Monday, Houthi fighters struck a Saudi naval vessel off the coast of Yemen (the Houthis claim it was a missile; the Saudis claim it was a suicide boat). Two sailors were killed. A video of the incident was taken.

On Tuesday, a Fox News article claimed, citing unnamed U.S. defense officials, that the real target of the attack was an American ship. Their evidence was a Houthi slogan, used commonly, which includes in part, “death to America”, that was shouted after the attack. This is either very amateur analysis or a deliberate effort to frame the attack as an Iranian attack against the United States.

The Houthis are a Shiite rebel group who have fought against the Yemeni government for over a decade. In 2014, the Houthis allied with the ousted President Ali Abdullah Saleh, their former enemy, and in early 2015, seized the Yemeni capital of Sana’a. Following this event, Saudi Arabia launched a military intervention backed by other Gulf Arab states and the U.S., initiating the present civil war in Yemen. The war has killed thousands of civilians, internally displaced millions and threatens millions with famine in the region’s poorest country.

The Houthis, while receiving some support from Iran, are an independent group that has operated for years and pursue their own domestic political agenda. Their ties to Iran are frequently exaggerated in U.S. media, and it is common for them to be labeled as “Iranian proxies”, especially when it serves the narrative of those who wish to label Iran as a sponsor of terrorism and accuse it of destabilizing the region.

The reality is that Iran has limited influence on the actions of the Houthis. In 2014, Iran discouraged them from taking over Sana’a, but they did it anyway.

On Wednesday, in response to a ballistic missile test by Iran on Sunday, National Security Adviser Michael Flynn announced from the White House briefing room that the administration was “officially putting Iran on notice”, making the administration policy on Iran clear.

Finally, on Thursday, White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer falsely accused Iran of attacking “our vessel” off of Yemen. Although he accepted a correction from Major Garret from CBS News that it was actually a Saudi vessel, the whole incident was brushed off as a small error, even though the difference between attacking a Saudi and an American vessel is huge, and his claim that Iran was responsible was left unchecked.

One dangerous falsehood, that Houthis targeted an American vessel, quickly turned into the charge that Iran targeted an American vessel, just within a day. This would be a clear act of war.

This kind of dangerous rhetoric and outright lies from the new administration needlessly harm already tedious relations with Iran, which thanks to the nuclear deal in 2015, improved slightly and likely allowed for the quick release of U.S. sailors that were captured in Iranian waters a little over a year ago.

It is worth noting that Iran’s missile test did not violate the terms of the nuclear deal, as some Iran hawks have claimed. Nor does it violate any UN resolution, as all legally binding resolutions against Iranian missile tests were voided by the JCPOA accord.

Iran has complied with the deal, and there is no threat that Iran will attempt to develop nuclear weapons under the strict terms of the agreement. The purpose of all this seems, at the very least, to be to push Iran into abandoning its end of the deal so that the U.S. can claim once again how untrustworthy Iran is and scrap the deal.

On Friday, the Trump administration announced new sanctions against individuals and entities connected to Iran’s missile program.

It is easy to see how these provocations could lead to a military confrontation. Such a confrontation would serve no American interest, and could destabilize one of the few stable countries in that region. All of this is a gift to Iranian hardliners, who seek to gain the most from any confrontation with the U.S.

The Trump administration is yet again proving it is reckless in its dealings with other nations, and it is only a matter of time before they spark a new conflict.

About Christian Evans

Christian Evans is a blogger and writer from Venice, California. He is a student of journalism at Brigham Young University-Idaho and writes about war, foreign policy, immigration, drugs and police. His work is published at medium.com/@christianevans

Our Books

thisone

Related Articles

Related

A ‘Defend the Guard’ Explainer

A ‘Defend the Guard’ Explainer

Presidential administrations come and go but the war machine churns relentlessly on. “Defend the Guard” legislation can throw a monkey wrench in its cogs. Defend the Guard is a state-level bill that would stop the deployment of a state’s National Guard units unless...

read more
Zelensky: Peace Talks Are an ‘Impossibility’

Zelensky: Peace Talks Are an ‘Impossibility’

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Tuesday signed a decree that ruled out any talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin, declaring they would be an “impossibility.” The decree was first put forward by the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine....

read more
How Should Christians Treat Unjust Laws?

How Should Christians Treat Unjust Laws?

May Christians ignore unjust laws? When you ask a Christian what the relationship between the Christian and the government is they are most likely to point to Matthew 22:21 (NET), “Then give to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are...

read more

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This