Wall Talk

by | Jan 14, 2019

Wall Talk

by | Jan 14, 2019

There’s lot of Wall talk going on these days, but both political sides’ proposed solutions would seem to make everyone in this country less free. Is there a way to address these border issues in a way that would increase personal freedom instead?

Looking at each sides’ argument objectively could leave one to become very confused. There are great points on both sides of this debate:

One Side Says something like: “You can’t have a welfare state and open borders, because people will flock here and suck up all of our resources. It’s unsustainable!”

While the other side says things like: “They are people: women and children dying every day. How can we just turn our backs?”

One doesn’t have to be a border expert to resolve this matter. All one would really need is a keen eye for seeing through politicians, from both sides, when they attempt to use a terrible situation for their own political gains. That and some common sense, or just keep reading. The purpose of this article is to propose an alternative solution to the Border issue. An issue that seems to be benefiting both sides politically at the moment. One could even pose the question, “Would either side even benefit from a true solution?” or “Do both sides have more to gain from the chaos?”

But that question is one for another time. As promised in the above paragraph, the topic of this article is to present another idea that isn’t a “Solution” to the issue, but more of a giant step in the right direction…

End the War on Drugs.

Ending the War on Drugs may seem like a drastic idea to some. However, there are many valid arguments and mountains of evidence (look into the Portugal Drug Decriminalization) as to why this seemingly crazy idea could actually work, and that society would most likely be much better off, not to mention freer, as a result.

First off, because even the Federal Prisons in this country cannot keep drugs out of their own inmates’ hands. The War on Drugs isn’t stopping the sale of drugs. It merely moved this process into the hands of criminals. Creating black markets to feed the giant demand. Making criminals rich in the process. Just like in the era of Prohibition in the 1920s when the government thought they knew what was best for all American people and outlawed the sale of Alcohol. Which spawned a major wave of crime and violence leading the rise of notorious figures like Al Capone.

To make matters worse, the War on Drugs has lasted much longer than the alcohol prohibition did. Leading to an ever-increasing level of intensity in how this war is fought by Law Enforcement, of all variety, on this country’s streets. The existing adversarial attitude between the police and the people is a direct result of this increased intensity. Some places more than others, but it exists in every part of society. Another unforeseen consequence of this Law Enforcement ramp-up of equipment and technique is that often the smartest, most violent and sometimes craziest criminals are the only ones who are able to rise to the top of these black markets. This would seem to fit the description of the current cartels who each rule a piece of the U.S./Mexico border. On the Mexican side, of course. [Every good Branarchist (Brandon + Anarchist) knows that only one gang runs the border on the U.S. side. That being the U.S. Gov/CIA, etc.]

What would happen if CVS started to sell any drug that one could desire, all totally legal? Complete with directions, ingredients list, and proper dosages? Even if you disagree with the idea of Heroine at CVS, you cannot disagree that this move would virtually cut off all of the funds of the Mexican drug cartels(Just don’t tell them that this author told you so.). They would be totally crippled. A fair argument could easily be made that shrinking the money supply to the cartels would make the border areas, and Mexico overall, a better place to live. Perhaps fewer people would be compelled to risk it all in an attempt to cross the border into the U.S.

Or maybe not, but it would seem like a logical step in the right direction. At least more logical than continuing the status quo or building a wall. A wall that would inevitably lead to a price increase on drugs that have to be smuggled around, under or over it. Not building a wall while continuing to fight this unwinnable War on Drugs will keep the drugs flowing, bringing with them all the negative effects that come along with any black-market operation. Either way, these vicious Drug Cartels continue to stack money and run the border.

Republished from morelawsmoreproblems.com.

Brandon Smith

Brandon Smith

View all posts

Our Books

libertarian inst books

Related Articles

Related

Fighting the ‘Middle State’

Fighting the ‘Middle State’

From around the middle of the twentieth century, federal agencies tasked with law enforcement, intelligence gathering, and various types of “defense” have accrued overwhelming power in the United States. Democrats, who now worship such agencies, may wail at the term...

read more
Did the IRS Manipulate the 2020 Election?

Did the IRS Manipulate the 2020 Election?

Hunter Biden pled guilty on Thursday to a barrage of federal tax crimes. But will the Internal Revenue Service and Justice Department ever plead guilty to stealing the 2020 election for Joe Biden? In 2023, the IRS assessed 18,599,109 penalties on individuals who...

read more
The Ultimate Case Against the Churchill Cult

The Ultimate Case Against the Churchill Cult

According to the National WWII Museum, the Second World War resulted in 45,000,000 civilian deaths, 15,000,000 combat deaths, and 25,000,000 soldiers permanently wounded. This is what many academics and media influencers refer to as "The Good War." Just as we cannot...

read more
Churchill Devotees Ignore the Fundamental Question

Churchill Devotees Ignore the Fundamental Question

Popular historian Darryl Cooper was a guest on the Tucker Carlson Show on September 2 and the podcast caused an eruption of backlash on the internet. Cooper and Carlson discussed several topics, but the one that drew the most hostility was their willingness to...

read more
TGIF: What Government Has Wrought

TGIF: What Government Has Wrought

Imagine two candidates for president, and ask yourself who is more likely to win. Candidate A observes that people are facing generally rising prices. Their total at the supermarket checkout is higher than last year. Filling up the car at the gas station takes a...

read more

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This