Stand with The Libertarian Institute

The Empire has us on the brink of nuclear Armageddon. The central bank has us flirting with economic-social collapse. Americans are increasingly paranoid of one another and simultaneously invested in wielding the state against one another.

The voices of the establishment are legion. The voices of dissent are few. Make your stand for liberty by supporting The Libertarian Institute today.

We Ended the War in Iraq (Yes Again, But Also Not Really)

by | Dec 10, 2021

We Ended the War in Iraq (Yes Again, But Also Not Really)

by | Dec 10, 2021

2340862578 7c82db544b c

On Thursday, the Pentagon announced the formal end to the U.S. combat mission in Iraq, but all 2,500 troops that are currently in the country will stay in an advisory role.

The Biden administration agreed with Iraq back in July to end the U.S. combat mission by the end of this year, and it was clear when the announcement was made that US troops would stay and nothing would really change.

The Iraqi government has been under pressure to expel the U.S. since January 2020, when the U.S. killed Iranian Gen. Qasem Soleimani and Iraqi militia leader Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis in a drone strike in Baghdad. In the wake of the assassination, Iraq’s parliament voted unanimously to kick the U.S. out.

Tensions flared earlier this year when President Biden bombed Iraqi Shia militias in eastern Syria and then again in Iraq. The deal to formally end the U.S. combat role was meant to placate the militias that the U.S. has been targeting, but without any significant drawdown of troops, they will likely not be satisfied.

“Remember, this is a change in mission, right? Not necessarily a change in physical posture,” Pentagon spokesman John Kirby said. “There won’t be a dramatic shift from yesterday to tomorrow, based on how we’ve already been working ourselves into this new mission.”

Keeping troops in Iraq will achieve little but create a tripwire for further conflicts with Iraq’s Shia militias. The U.S. troops are technically staying in Iraq to advise and train the government in its fight against ISIS remnants. But the U.S. presence is likely more about curbing Iranian influence and supporting the US occupation of eastern Syria.

This article was originally featured at Antiwar.com and is republished with permission.

About Dave DeCamp

Dave DeCamp is the news editor of Antiwar.com. Follow him on Twitter @decampdave.

Our Books

thisone

Related Articles

Related

Joe Biden, Executor-In-Chief

Joe Biden, Executor-In-Chief

On July 4, President Biden declared, “Liberty is under assault…rights we assumed were protected are no longer.” Biden, however, was referring solely to a few Supreme Court decisions he deplored, not to the federal supremacy he championed for almost 50 years in the...

read more
A Policy of Escalation ft. Dave DeCamp Ep. 240

A Policy of Escalation ft. Dave DeCamp Ep. 240

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n5JMeqDhrmc Patrick is joined by Dave DeCamp, News Editor at Antiwar.com, to discuss the latest in US relations with Taiwan regarding the growing tension with China, as well as the similarities of that situation with US policy regarding...

read more
Imagining a Revived, Twenty-First Century Capitalism

Imagining a Revived, Twenty-First Century Capitalism

The death of capitalism has been a common topic of conversation lately. Millennials seem resigned to it, the younger generations can’t wait for it. Bastions of global capitalism—alleged capitalism—such as the World Economic Forum in Davos are quite eagerly promoting...

read more

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This