Whitmer Kidnap Judge: Defense Can’t Cite FBI Entrapment Efforts

by | Aug 28, 2023

Whitmer Kidnap Judge: Defense Can’t Cite FBI Entrapment Efforts

by | Aug 28, 2023

judges gavel

justice concept, selective focus on nearest part ,lens blur f/x

During Tuesday’s opening statements at the trial of three men accused of aiding the 2020 alleged militia plot to kidnap Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer, defense attorney Bill Barnett made accurate statements about an FBI informant involved in the case—describing how the informant, Dan Chappel, became the second in command of a militia, trained his fellow members and encouraged them to commit crimes.

State prosecutor Bill Rollstin objected to Barnett’s factual statements, accusing him of trying to “poison the jury” by arguing that the FBI entrapped his client.

Barnett responded to Rollstin’s claim by arguing that he’s only presenting true facts to the jury.

“I was stating facts that are in the police reports. Everything’s a fact. They don’t want to hear facts in this case,” he said.

Barnett further said that he’s not even arguing that his client, Eric Molitor, was entrapped. Barnett said Molitor didn’t have anything to do with the kidnapping conspiracy and is innocent of any wrongdoing.

“I never once said, ‘entrapment,’” the lawyer said. “I’m sorry I had to tell the whole story that’s not being told here [about FBI informants provoking the plot].”

However, Judge Charles Hamlyn agreed with the prosecution. The judge claimed that by noting that an FBI informant was second in command of a militia supposedly plotting to kidnap Whitmer, Barnett was essentially making an entrapment defense.

“There were a couple times you said the FBI did the training, the FBI was the XO [executive officer], [confidential human source] Dan was the one to organize these guys and did that,” the judge said.

“If you didn’t cross the line, you were right on it,” he added.

“When you said CHS Dan is the one who did the training, that is describing the FBI as entrapping your client.”

The judge’s ruling sparked outrage from those watching the trial, including from the sister of Adam Fox, one of the men who was found guilty last year of plotting against Whitmer.

However, the judge’s decision is par for the course in a case that has been heavily slanted towards the prosecution in multiple trials.

For instance, at his federal trials last year, Fox was prohibited from introducing as evidence thousands of text messages between FBI informants and their handling agents. Those texts show, among other things, that FBI agents encouraged their informants to kidnap Whitmer.

And in this state trial, the prosecution has repeatedly spread misinformation. Michigan’s Attorney General’s Office has sent press releases calling the defendants in this case—Molitor and twin brothers William and Michael Null—members of the Wolverine Watchmen, when they were never members of that group.

Prosecutor Rollstin also repeated a debunked claim in April that Barry Croft—who was found guilty last year—of issuing a $1,000 bounty against an FBI informant who betrayed him. As Headline USA has explained, Rolstin’s accusation was already debunked in federal court in February 2022.

Even a judge in the current case spread misinformation in February, when a court order was issued that accused Brandon Caserta and Daniel Harris of participating in the plot—even though Caserta and Harris were found not guilty last year.

That judge, Kevin Elsenheimer, was replaced by Judge Hamlyn as the one presiding over the current trial. Based on Hamlyn’s pro-prosecution decisions on Tuesday, it appears as if Hamlyn is little better than his counterpart.

This article was originally featured at Headline USA and is republished with permission.

About Ken Silva

Ken Silva has been a reporter for more than 10 years, working in places such as the British Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands, and the United States. His favorite writers include Annie Jacobsen and Wendy Painting, and he thinks Robert Nozick's "Anarchy, State, and Utopia" is highly underrated among libertarians today.

Our Books

9 libooksjuly2023sm

Related Articles


Losing a Plane? Try Losing a Nuke

Losing a Plane? Try Losing a Nuke

Recently, the U.S. Marine Corps lost (and later found) an F-35 aircraft. The circumstances are mostly undisclosed or rumor based, though that is to be expected in regards to such a sensitive matter. While it has become a comical example of incompetence, it’s not the...

read more
TGIF: Limited Government’s Bait and Switch

TGIF: Limited Government’s Bait and Switch

In a fundamental respect, libertarian minarchism (minimal, or limited, government) and market anarchism (or anarcho-capitalism) have something important in common: neither can guarantee individual rights. But there's a big difference: unlike market anarchism,...

read more
It’s the Inflation, Stupid!

It’s the Inflation, Stupid!

At the beginning of last year, economist Paul Krugman wondered aloud whether Americans would even notice if the economy improved. In his considered opinion, it was already obvious that the economy was humming along merrily and that ordinary shmucks just didn’t get it....

read more

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This