Blog

US Abrams Tanks Withdrawn from Fighting in Ukraine

xm1a1

Five four million dollar tanks up in smoke.

They’ll make every excuse they wish but the days of manned tanks are over.

Ukraine has lost five Abrams tanks in recent months, The New York Times reported this month, citing an unnamed senior US official. At least three more have been moderately damaged, Markus Reisner, an Austrian military trainer, told the outlet.

Ukraine pulled its Abrams tanks from the front due to Russian drone tactics, US officials say…

The Aircraft Carrier is the Crossbow and Chariot of the Modern Age

uss gerald r ford full ship shock trials

The US Navy, of course, is desperately trying to get authorization to build more Ford-class carriers. Ironic that they name the carrier after a violence broker famous for being rather clumsy and unable to navigate around.

The first of class doesn’t work properly: it cannot reliably launch and retrieve aircraft nor does it have a weapons elevator system that works all the time.

Stop the madness.

Although the Navy wants to achieve and maintain in coming years a fleet of 381 manned battle force ships, including 12 aircraft carriers, force-structure studies done by the Navy that eventually led to the 381-ship goal showed future Navy force structures that included 8 to 12 carriers, to be supplemented (in the case of the lower end of that range) by up to 6 light aircraft carriers (CVLs). The Navy does not currently operate CVLs. The Navy in recent years has experimented with the concept of using an LHA-type amphibious assault ship with an embarked group of F-35B Joint Strike Fighters as a CVL.28.

https://sgp.fas.org/crs/weapons/RS20643.pdf

The most criminal event occurred in 2019 when it was obvious there were serious problems with the Ford design that may be un-fixable. Admirals pressed Congress to fund two more Fords earlier than planned, as though they wanted to get them under construction before Congress and media learned about problems.

https://www.g2mil.com/EMALS.htm

If Israel’s Apologists Insist ‘From the River to the Sea’ Is Genocidal…

If Israel’s Apologists Insist ‘From the River to the Sea’ Is Genocidal…

The ‘Anti-Semitism’ Canard

Back in early November, with Israel’s genocide in Gaza having been underway for several weeks, Rashida Tlaib, a Democratic member of the US House of Representatives from Michigan, called for an end to Israel’s oppression of the Palestinian people and shared a video on Twitter objecting to President Joe Biden claiming to speak for all Americans in saying, “We stand with Israel.”

The video showed images of Gaza being bombarded; bloody injured and dead Palestinians; and protestors in the US calling for a ceasefire, an end to Israel’s 56-year occupation of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, an end to Israel’s 17-year illegal blockade of Gaza. “Free! Free Palestine!” protestors chanted at one rally. At other events, protestors were heard chanting “from the river to the sea”.

That chant derives from the phrase “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free”, which since the First Intifada that erupted in December 1987 has been a popular rallying call among Palestinians demanding an end to Israel’s occupation and apartheid regime, which encompasses all of the land of the former territory of Palestine, from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea.

Tlaib appeared in the video condemning the Biden administration’s support for Israel’s military assault on Gaza. Near the end of the video, after a clip of administration spokesperson John Kirby expressing the White House’s view that the death of innocent civilians was a tragic but acceptable outcome, Tlaib was shown looking at the camera to say, “We will remember.” Following that, the video displayed the text “JOE BIDEN SUPPORTED THE GENOCIDE OF THE PALESTINIAN PEOPLE”.

In a separate Twitter post, Tlaib explained, “From the river to the sea is an aspirational call for freedom, human rights, and peaceful coexistence, not death, destruction, or hate.”

The Israeli embassy in the US posted a reply that said, “No verbal acrobatics can hide the true meaning behind this slogan – namely – the obliteration of the State of @Israel. Hamas’ charter clearly states ‘Hamas rejects any alternative to the full and complete liberation of Palestine, from the River to the Sea.’”

Clearly, the government of Israel objects to the idea of the Palestinian people being liberated from its criminal oppression.

Just as evidently, so do most members of the US Congress. After Tlaib posted the video, the House of Representatives passed a resolution censuring her for embracing “a genocidal call to violence to destroy the state of Israel and its people”.

Last week, the House went even further in its opposition to freedom and equality for the Palestinians by passing a resolution condemning the slogan as “an antisemitic call to arms with the goal of the eradication of the State of Israel”, a phrase that “seeks to deny Jewish people the right to self-determination and calls for the removal of the Jewish people from their ancestral homeland”.

The resolution cited the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), which maintains that those who use the “antisemitic” slogan “seek Israel’s destruction through violent means”, and the American Jewish Committee (AJC), which likewise describes it as an “antisemitic” slogan used as a “rallying cry for terrorist groups and their sympathizers”.

A week ago, ZeroHedge and Breaking Points co-hosted a debate on whether Israel’s military assault on Gaza is justified, with Dave Smith and Cenk Uygur arguing the negative and Dennis Prager and Batya Ungar-Sargon arguing the affirmative. The question was put to both sides during the debate of whether the phrase “from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” is anti-Semitic.

Ungar-Sargon, a deputy opinion editor for Newsweek, replied that she has friends who support Palestinians’ rights who tell her that when they use the phrase, they just mean that they want there to be freedom for all.

“But it is a line from Hamas’s charter,” she continued, “and so I think the burden of proof is on the people chanting it that they don’t mean it in an eliminationist way that would wreak havoc and violence on Jews because, like I said, it’s part of the charter.”

She further stated that she wouldn’t comment on whether it’s anti-Semitic, despite having just essentially argued that we must automatically assume the anyone who uses the phrase is advocating violence against Jews.

In fact, there is no iteration of the phrase “from the river to the sea” in Hamas’s 1988 Charter. But we’ll come back to that.

read more…

I Met a Man

I Met a Man

Located nearly three hours drive from Adelaide, the property rested in the South-East. The nearest township a good thirty minutes if you pushed your vehicle over dirty unselaed road. It was a job that a mate threw my way, help out some old timers that he knew through the grapevine. Good people, I was told. I arrived early in the morning, a brisk autumn day, with blue skies and puffy white clouds. The country still brown from a late summer with flocks of trees and the occasional blistering of bushes. A tall man with a leathery face greeted me. A rabbit skin hat on his head, with olive green overalls and brown boots that looked old though polished often.

We shook hands, his were calloused while his eyes buried beneath the leather of his skin remained welcoming. Bill was in his nineties. He had worn the uniform of the army as a boy, been a roustabout, briefly a stevedore then a farmer. Above all a father, granddad and his sixty-seventh year as a husband. Dorothy, his wife had insisted that he had someone help him while the fence line is repaired.

“Everything has fallen into a bit of disarray,” he seemed embarrassed to admit as he showed me a worn map of his property boundary. Most specifically the fence that we would repair.

“Best to get it done before the winter rains set in,” he explained as we threw on iron stakes, rolled fencing wire and the tools we would need onto the flat wood tray of his ancient Land Cruiser. Once we arrived I did the heavy lifting, placing white stone back onto the vintage wall that men had built most likely during the great depression, or even earlier. Piles of the stone lay strewn about, Bill had stacked them up a few years ago with the ambition of fixing them back where they needed to go.

“Dorothy doesn’t want me lifting much any more, I’ve fused discs in my back.”

I made sure that he advised while I lifted. I could sense that it ate at his pride to watch another man work while he stood idle. So he readied the wire and cut what he could. We rolled out the line. Then where it was needed drove stakes in with our star droppers, replacing the decayed ghost of what barely remained along his boundary line.

As we worked, Bill told me stories of his life. About his kids, they were now all over the world with families of their own. Then as is often the case between men at work, women, war, sports and sometimes politics pop up into the mix of conversation points.

“A Mohammedan and Chinamen has as much right to fight back and to protect their homes as you or I. We have no right sticking our noses into their business, no bloody right being over there.”

I lifted up some heavy stones, Bill could not stand by to watch. He came to carry some of his own.

“People should mind their own business. Live and let live.”

He offered me a piece of yesterday’s pastie that Dorothy had baked. It reminded me of those my grandma would make. As tempted as I was, I declined. I swigged my water as he sat on the back of his Land Cruiser. I went on some distance continuing to work. Bill looked into the horizon, across the property he owned and into the distance beyond.

When I returned he had been attaching the wire to the stakes, twisting the wire and securing it in place. His fingers still strong as he did so. Where the old wood remained, we hammered in the U-shaped nails to make sure that they had another decade or so of service.

“We all have the right to be free,” Bill stated firmly among the stream of words we both spoke.

We talked about censorship. Bill had little time for certain music or racy videos, he believed in God but his paddock was the church. He figured what people wanted to watch was their business, not for him. He went onto explain that Dorothy enjoyed programs that drove him ‘mad with boredom’. So he didn’t watch them.

The internet may as well have been a fax machine with HTTP and WWW at the front of it. Dorothy did all of that sort of thing. He listened to cassette tapes in his truck and watched movies on film. Still bought magazines and read the paper each day. Even then he said he was sceptical of what was written in them.

“Cowards want wars so that men must fight them. No one wins in the end.”

Bill told me that when he was younger he “believed in the wisdom of men but now thought them all fools. No one knows how best to rule, they should leave everyone alone. The good will prevail that way, only the bad want to rule others. It all gives control to the weak willed.”

Free markets, freedom of speech, make peace no war.

“Dorothy agrees but she isn’t a loud mouth about it like me.”

No internet, no memes or grandiose social media displays. Just a man on his land, working, toiling, living free as he can be. If he were a tenured academic and typed up a treatise then maybe Bill would be as revered as a Hayek, Mises or Hazlet. Instead he is a man, calloused hands, scars and years of labour on his frame, he lives it, walks it, is it. Like thousands more who are dying or lost beneath the miasma of the controlling fiends that barely know their own minds but believe they can rule societies of others.

“You a wrestler?” he asked.

I told him what sports I had played. He had boxed, a middleweight, ten and one as an amateur. As we finished the lifting and placing stones in their place. We discussed violence, even the recent stabbings.

“I’d have throttled them to death,” his eyes glazed over with a look that men understand. Conviction.

I agreed.

“Too many cowards now mate, not enough men,” the ghost of Bill’s left hook lingered as he spoke.

“If I saw someone go after my daughters or a woman like that, I’d have ended him. Buried him six feet under. I’d die before I stood by and watched,” his chest stiffened and fists clenched.

I agreed.

We finished up the work. Went our ways. An honest days work in a beautiful spot. It was an honour to work on Bill’s land and to shake his hand. Above all, I’d met a man.

April, 2024

Podcasts

scotthortonshow logosq

coi banner sq2@0.5x

liberty weekly thumbnail

Don't Tread on Anyone Logo

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)