Blog

The Kyle Anzalone Show [GUEST] Ken Silva : Assassinations and Cover Ups

A near miss by millimeters, a sniper who waited, and a teenager’s digital footprint that should have set off alarms—our conversation with investigative reporter Ken Silva digs into the attempted assassinations against Donald Trump, the shooting of Charlie Kirk, and the enduring mystery of the January 6 pipe bombs. We trace what the investigations missed, where the public record contradicts official lines, and how secrecy fuels the very conspiracies authorities claim to fight.

We start with Butler: the rooftop angle outside a tight 150‑yard perimeter, the lack of snipers on a usable roof, and a timeline that shows a local officer interrupting the barrage before the final shot. Ken walks through newly surfaced Google account data tied to Thomas Crooks, revealing a pivot from pro‑Trump postings to violent fantasies during COVID—material that raises an uncomfortable question: how did nobody in law enforcement catch this? We also examine the autopsy and toxicology gaps that keep open basic questions about the shooter’s state of mind.

From there, we move to the Charlie Kirk case. The alleged shooter, Tyler Robinson, reportedly confessed to his father, but controversy remains over ballistics, surveillance footage that hasn’t been released, and gag orders that limit public scrutiny. The vantage point appears so precise that it implies prior scouting or help. When critical records stay sealed, speculation thrives. Ken outlines what evidence would close those loops without compromising a fair trial.

Finally, we revisit the January 6 pipe bombs: conflicting timelines, a Secret Service sweep that didn’t prevent a device from being found near the DNC while Kamala Harris was present, and the operational effect of drawing resources at the worst possible moment. Gait analysis claiming to out the suspect may intrigue, but it’s not enough to name a culprit. The common thread across all three stories is the need for disciplined transparency—release the timelines, the raw footage, the forensics—and the courage to admit when procedures failed.

If this kind of clear‑eyed scrutiny matters to you, follow the show, share this episode with a friend who wants facts over noise, and leave a review with the one question you want answered next. Your feedback shapes where we dig next.

The Kyle Anzalone Show [GUEST] Matt Hoh: Could Israel Go Nuclear on Iran? And Will Trump Really Stop the Ukraine War?

What happens when conscience collides with command? We dig into the duty to refuse illegal orders, why “just following orders” isn’t a shield under U.S. military law, and how real-world pressures push service members toward compliance even when red flags are waving. Drawing on the Nuremberg legacy and the Uniform Code of Military Justice, we lay out the reasonable person standard, the gray zones operators face, and the information gaps created by tempo, classification, and deference to the chain of command.

The debate isn’t abstract. We tackle drone strikes and maritime interdictions that occur far from declared battlefields, where targets are labeled threats without due process and legality is assumed rather than tested. We also unpack the political firestorm around lawmakers telling troops to refuse unlawful orders, the backlash from prominent figures in Washington, and why specificity matters if you want to help real people making life-or-death choices under orders.

From there, we turn to Gaza and the West Bank, mapping how a “truce” can mask a harder reality on the ground: concentrated control of land and water, constrained aid, and an approach to settlement and displacement designed to be incremental and quiet rather than spectacular and condemned. We examine the strategic logic behind slow-motion annexation, the global signals that enable it, and the human consequences that follow—especially for families facing medical collapse and shrinking horizons.

It all connects to a single theme: accountability. A credible military requires lawful orders and the courage to refuse unlawful ones. A sustainable foreign policy demands consistency between values and actions. If this conversation challenged your assumptions or gave you a clearer framework for thinking about duty, law, and Gaza, share it with a friend, subscribe for future episodes, and leave a review with the one question you still want answered.

IDF Force Structure in Peril

image1170x530cropped (2)

I suspect the Israeli military force losses are even greater than they let on.

The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) last won a war in 1973; everything else has been a stalemate or a near-run defeat. This latest massacre machine against defenseless humans may be the last gasp of an always overestimated military entity.

During two years of Israel’s genocidal war in Gaza, the military lost 923 troops and saw 6,399 wounded, while roughly 20,000 soldiers suffer from post-traumatic stress, according to Israeli media citing army data.

Under heavy military censorship, the army faces accusations of concealing higher losses to preserve morale.

Brik wrote that many officers sought immediate discharge and younger recruits refused to sign long-term contracts, creating a wide shortage of professional staff across the military.

The IDF is not the vaunted war machine they advertsie themselves as.

https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/israeli-army-faces-worst-manpower-crisis-in-its-history-general-says/3758424

Anti-War Blog – Cowardice of Mass Murder

Anti-War Blog – Cowardice of Mass Murder

In the immediate aftermath of a tragic event it’s difficult to find clarity of facts and thoughts through a miasma of lies, unknowns and emotions. The impulse to collectivise, derive explanation from demographic classification is both primal and learned. Just as the impulse to find simple answers. A father and son, acted as individuals with deranged rationalisation and murdered innocent and unarmed people at Bondi, Sydney this weekend. At this time, fifteen people are dead.

Despite the propaganda pushed by mostly American media and content creators, Australians still have access to legal firearms. There are more firearms in the hands of licensed gun owners than before the gun buy back scheme, a reactionary policy to the Port Arthur massacre. The Bondi murderers used legally owned firearms. We can see one of the killers operate a bolt action rifle as he does harm. For many, it’s a simple solution. Make guns illegal. Like drugs and murder itself, the legality of an act or item does little to deter those who would use or do vile things. Prohibition is the inclination for governments to impose, and a simple solution for a population of dependent people. As a reaction, Australian politicians have already promised more gun control laws.

From the Bondi killings, we have numerous angles and views recorded on mobile devices, giving us a voyeurs keyhole from which we can speculate and derive perspective. It’s true, if some there were armed, they could have shot back and it would be over. Unfortunately in modern Australia, only the government, some private security and by definition criminals carry in public. In the moments before unarmed Ahmed el Ahmed tackled and disarmed one of the killers, we see one of what is alleged to be up to four armed police officers hiding, cowering and not responding to the killing. As well as a police vehicle drive past, not stopping to engage. Ahmed, once he disarms the murderer is unable to kill him. He has no idea how to use a firearm. He is after all a common Australian. Guns now are an abstract for video games, movies and the government or in this case criminals to have. Skill at arms, or basic firearm fundamentals are for a past Australia, the age of the Digger and Outback wrangler, a reputation modern Aussies benefit from, while having little in common with.

Only the police should have guns, will be the cry. And despite having armed police visibly present, twenty minutes passed before the killers were stopped. Not too long ago, in gun touting Texas, the Uvalde police stood by for over an hour while a killer went on a murderous rampage against children in a school. The parents prevented by those same police from saving lives, their own children’s. Instead the government agents stood by, and did little other than buffer parent from child. Innocent people died because of such coerced dependency. Inside of Australia, dependency in all areas, has become cultural.

Bondi not too long ago was the scene of a mass stabbing. The entitled arrogance of a man who killed numerous people, his target women. It took a female officer, acting on her own inclinations and instincts as a protector to stop him. The security in the mall, where the murdering occurred were unarmed. They did little to deter the murderer as he walked through, killing and wounding the innocent. In his mind he was steeled by a deranged self righteousness. When, there is numerous victims, it’s called terrorism. Otherwise, in other contexts it’s a diagnosis of mental health. Whether narcissism, ideology, religion or whatever steers these individuals, their mental health seems to be at the whims of those who determine through profession or agenda their categorisation and thus criminality. The father and son from the weekend are terrorists, mental health status no longer applies now that it’s deemed a political act.

In China, a police state where firearms are hard for law abiding people to possess, meat cleavers are the weapon of choice among deranged individuals. In 2010 several incidents saw attacks with cleavers mostly directed against children. In one attack seven children and two adults were murdered by a man in a preschool. Soon after another man stabbed eight children in Fujian province. Later in the year, an elderly woman and young child were cleaved to death by a man near a school. In 2014, a man severely injured eight children as they played near a school in Hubei province. In March of that year, at Kunming Railway Station, eight separatists stabbed thirty five people to death and injured one hundred and forty three others. In 2019, a man killed eight children at a school with a meat clever. The motivation of these men all spiteful and arrogantly entitled, whether determined as mentally unwell, politically motivated or otherwise. They targeted the most vulnerable, where no one was likely there to stop them during their twisted attacks. The putrid mindset of such killers is self serving, regardless of the tools they use to do harm.

Prohibition will reign in conjunction with censorship on information, imagery and communications. The authority is absolute and so long as there remains an existential threat, whether an object, ideology or pariah nation then the authority needs more power, the threat ever more apparent. It’s unlikely the cleaver attacks in China occurred because of social media posts, and just as video games, Marilyn Manson or ten pin bowling did not inspire the 1999 Columbine murderers, blame will always be sought regardless.

For those who are nativist and anti-migration, the imagery of a father and son, brown skinned, Muslim and from Pakistan is confirmation that all of them are alien invaders, A danger to a pure, mostly white, homogenised nation. Whether we delve back to the skin colour of Martin Bryant, not to mention the men responsible for two separate mass killing events in Australia during 1987. The Hoddle Street massacre saw seven killed and nineteen wounded by Julian Knight, a home grown man. Or, the Queen Street massacre later that year when Frank Vitkovic killed eight and injured five in his rampage. Across the Tasman in New Zealand, Brenton Harrison Tarrant, an Australian born supremacist killed fifty-one people and injured forty in a Mosque during his 2019 frenzy. Not to mention famous child killer, Bevan Spencer von Einem who recently died while under the protection of the State in prison who was also born on the soil where he took the life of the innocent. Norwegian neo-Nazi, Aneers Behring Breivik murdered seventy-seven people in 2011, many of them teenagers.

It would be dangerous and disingenuous to assume race or religion is the reason for killers to act as they do. The malicious act to take life based on a set of values or perverse need, transcends race or religion. Overseas, while in uniform, such killers may as well be awarded a medal for similar conduct, under certain circumstances and could even write a best selling book, to have a movie made based on such bloody exploits. Context, even if the victims are unarmed civilians can be conjured. There will be those in equally deplorable circles who will see these two killers as heroes because of who, or why they killed. This past August celebrated the eightieth anniversary of the droppings of the atomic bombs on Japanese cities, there was no shortage of commentary celebrating in the mass murder of innocent people, including children who were not even born when the war started.

When we see through smart phones, on local soil the killings of the familiar, those like us. It’s unacceptable, an intrusion. Reprehensible. When the killings are done over there, in the distant frontiers relegated to policy and imperial ambition, the dead are meaningless, statistics to dismiss. Such is the privilege of perspective. The innocent dead are not props for the stage of misery, yet many minds think otherwise.

The intended victims of the father and son killers at Bondi, were Jewish people. It is assumed the attacks were motivated as punishment for Israeli policies in Gaza and elsewhere. The innocent civilians in Australia, seemingly fair game to the killers who through their vile logic see them as representatives of the State of Israel. Some have argued it’s anti-semetic, while others are steering it as anti-Zionist or anti-Israel. Regardless the murder of innocent people is horrible and unjust, despite the rationales of murderers. If it’s the dropping of bombs on a city full of sleeping families, the mass starvation of millions including children, or the sniping of beach goers because they may have a passport to Israel, all should be seen as repulsive.

Anti-migrant voices, anti-gun advocates, anti-Muslims, even atheists will look at the event and use it as a conclusion of confirmation. Then one can delve into the conspiracies, every mass murder event finds those making claims of crisis actors or it’s a manipulative act to steer public opinion and justify more laws. It takes very little for government to push more laws. Crisis never goes to waste. The lack of critical thinking is a growing concern, especially among the terminally online. Some of which assume every event is staged and fake, concocted for them in an attempt to manipulate. Anecdotally, I have had people who are convinced AI animal slop videos, or Mr Beast content are all credible and legit, while to them murder is staged.

Some critics of Israel, have also speculated this event may be a Mossad operation. The trouble with entities such as Mossad, the CIA or even ASIO is there is no reason to ever trust them. Their histories are marred in lies, deception and violence and even glaring incompetence. In turn, the distrust is reasoned, due to increased criticism of the Israeli government for its genocide in Palestine, there is a need to manipulate and re-direct opinion by staging anti-Jewish violence. The Pulse Nightclub massacre was committed by a man who was motivated by his revulsion at US foreign policy, as was the terror attacks of September, 2001. Individuals can and will do horrible things as reaction to horrible things. The entire war on terror, which killed millions and ruined millions more lives was itself a self righteous reaction to a reaction of violent policies. The cycle of violence and reactions is ongoing, whether conducted by criminals, terrorists, governments or individuals. Many media outlets already tend to omit details about the genocide, or praise Israeli operations in Palestine, it’s unlikely there is a need to concoct a murder conspiracy such as this.

For those who do draw a collectivist reasoning in the recent Bondi mass murder, I wish to quote some feminists, “Not all men, but some how always a man.” And, while this is often dismissed outside the female dominated spectrum, because most people in general understand it to be a slur to assume all men as violent predators. The above mentioned are all males. So, using the same set of demographic profiling, collectivist reasoning, the feminist framing is as, if not more valid. As for prohibitions, I have also heard it said, “men rape with a penis so therefore it’s a weapon that should be removed.“ Again, we understand the appendage is not the problem. The mind who wields it is.

Politicians and the government will usually react the same way, granting itself more power. Even though we can see agents from the government cower and fail to protect. To outsource not just rights, but our entire everything to this monopoly, because it satisfies responsibility and obligation, despite failing has become a common belief. Dependency, ideology and collectivism allows for us to find simple solutions, to kick the can down the road for the next generation to deal with. Unfortunately as attention spans shorten, the rugged individual is bred out, government swells and timidity thrives, dependency will surge. And, every so often deranged and vile humans will, despite the laws, censorship, prohibitions, surveillance, do terrible things. If you see the world in collectives, can’t see individuals as unique and distinct, then that’s on you. If you think every solution requires coercion and collective punishment, censorship and prohibition, sadly you may be in a majority, the mob. That doesn’t make it a better or safer world.

The Kyle Anzalone Show: Zionist Meltdown as Control Over Narrative Evaporates

The old script is breaking. When anyone can watch unfiltered footage from Gaza on a phone, the gap between official talking points and visible reality becomes too wide to ignore. We dig into how that shift is changing minds, reshaping alliances, and exposing the cost of selective morality—especially around the meaning of “never again.” If genocide is always wrong, it cannot be bracketed by time, place, or politics. That stance doesn’t excuse anti-Semitism; it rejects it while refusing to let state violence hide behind history.

We also track an unexpected realignment on the American right. Tucker Carlson and Marjorie Taylor Greene are openly challenging the reflexive pro-Israel position that defined GOP orthodoxy for years, and their audience is listening. That split matters as the White House pursues a UN “board of peace” for Gaza and Netanyahu flatly denies any path to a Palestinian state. The contradiction is stark: promise a distant future while entrenching control now. Listeners hear the euphemisms, then see the footage, and trust the evidence.

Inside Israel’s government, rhetoric turns hardline. Itamar Ben Gvir’s calls for targeting Palestinian leaders and denying a Palestinian people aren’t fringe outbursts; they’re signals from power. Tamping down translation tools or burying posts won’t hide them. Meanwhile, in Washington, Trump praises Mohammed bin Salman, brushes off Khashoggi, and greenlights high-stakes deals—F-35s and possible nuclear cooperation—that will ripple across the region and complicate any Iran diplomacy. Every exception becomes a precedent; every double standard weakens leverage.

What cuts through the noise is a consistent ethic: protect universal rights, oppose collective punishment, and confront bigotry without silencing criticism of any state. If you’re ready for an honest, evidence-first conversation that refuses false binaries and respects your intelligence, hit play, share with a friend, and tell us where the narrative first broke for you. Subscribe, leave a review, and keep the debate real.

Pentagon Fraud and Accounting Errors: Feature and Not Bug

screenshot 2025 12 10 at 14 08 29 gao 25 108191 dod financial management accelerated timelines needed to address long standing issues and fraud risk

2028.

The plan is to spend four trillion more before they can deliver on proving where the money is going. You can’t make this up. I read the GAO reports so you don’t have to.

If fraud was a Ferris wheel, it would be shaped like the Pentagon.

The Marine Corps is the only organization to complete an audit and they comprise one percent of all DoD spending.

One percent.

As previously discussed, the Marine Corps was able to obtain and sustain a clean audit opinion in fiscal years 2023 and 2024 largely through a substantive-based audit approach and manual effort. The Marine Corps’ auditor noted that it performed a substantive-based audit approach, which included more than 70 site visits and testing of approximately 26 million assets. According to DOD, it was an all-hands effort to complete the Marine Corps audit. According to the total assets the DOD OIG reported in the fiscal year 2024 DOD agency financial report and the military service agency financial reports, the Marine Corps accounts for 1 percent of DOD’s assets.

There is one solution: freeze the pentagon spending machine until they can prove they know how to spend responsibly and provide accountability for whre the money goes.

Don’t hold your breath.

DOD’s financial management and business systems modernization has been on our High Risk List since 1995. We testified that, while DOD has taken steps to address this issue, it needs to do more in areas like action plans and demonstrating results.

Additionally, the full extent of fraud affecting DOD is unknown, so we’ve expanded this High Risk area to include fraud risk management.

Finally, DOD continues to face long-standing financial management issues as it works towards getting a “clean” audit opinion—i.e., when financial statements are presented fairly and are consistent with accounting principles.

https://files.gao.gov/reports/GAO-25-108191/index.html?_gl=1*kxb3ap*_ga*NDQ3NTE5NzMwLjE3NjUzOTMyOTQ.*_ga_V393SNS3SR*czE3NjUzOTMyOTMkbzEkZzEkdDE3NjUzOTMzMjUkajI4JGwwJGgw

Podcasts

scotthortonshow logosq

coi banner sq2@0.5x

liberty weekly thumbnail

Don't Tread on Anyone Logo

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

Pin It on Pinterest