If someone is A) skeptical about climate-change alarmist claims and B) favorable to the use of fossil fuels, why do the media and others automatically assume that B is the cause of A rather than the other way around? This is a form of bigotry: no one can doubt alarmist claims without being either corrupt or anti-science.
Recent
We continue reading and commentary of Ordinary Men.
Why don’t the US communist fan-girls and drones advocate for reading these tomes? Hoxha should make the Mamdanis and other Marxoid dullards swoon with infatuation. Enver Hoxha’s multi-volume published works—comprising his Selected Works, memoirs, reports, and...
One comment from Donald Trump cuts through the usual talking points: Ukraine should stop hitting Russian diesel refineries. We dig into why that matters, what it says about U.S. intelligence support for Ukrainian strikes, and how energy infrastructure attacks ripple...
