Blog

State Officials Pass Anti-Russian Measures to Virtue Signal Support for Ukraine

State Officials Pass Anti-Russian Measures to Virtue Signal Support for Ukraine

As supporters of Ukraine make loud displays of solidarity amid Russia’s invasion – including boycotts on Russian vodka – state governments in the US are virtue signaling their own support with proposals for bans and prohibitions on the country’s exports. 

A bill introduced last Friday by Massachusetts Democratic state representative Patrick Kearney calls for an outright ban on “the purchase and/or consumption by any and all consumers and entities in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts of any and all product[s] made in Russia.”

It’s unclear how Kearney intends to keep residents from drinking or eating Russian-made products, but other states have proposed more practical measures, with New Hampshire’s Republican Governor Chris Sununu ordering state liquor stores to pull all Russian-made booze from their shelves. The state’s laws dictate that liquor may only be sold through government-run outlets, effectively meaning a ban across all of New Hampshire.

Similar orders were issued by the governors of Ohio and Utah, while a North Carolina state senator is pushing the NC Alcoholic Beverage Control Board to follow suit. 

Texas Governor Greg Abbott stopped short of any official measure, but did call on retailers in the Lone Star state to stop selling Russian products, declaring that “Texas stands with Ukraine.”. 

 

In Pennsylvania, Governor Tom Wolf and the liquor control board instituted a ban on Russian goods, while the state’s treasury is actively working to divest from Russian companies. The legislature is seeking to codify the policy into law, though it is largely symbolic as the state’s Russia-based holdings are reported to be minimal. 

While the moves are unlikely to have a noticeable impact on Russia’s economy, they highlight deep anti-Russian sentiments built up over the past decade and inflamed by Moscow’s military action in Ukraine. Following years of fake scandals ranging from Russiagate to Bountygate, Americans were primed to see Vladimir Putin as the ‘New Hitler’ – certainly not the first US ‘adversary’ alleged to be a madman resembling the Nazi leader.

North Korea Conducts Missile Test After Declaring ‘New Situation’ With China

North Korea Conducts Missile Test After Declaring ‘New Situation’ With China

North Korea has conducted a ballistic missile test which it said would help launch new reconnaissance satellites into orbit. Japanese and South Korea officials announced the launch early Sunday, saying the munition traveled 190 miles before landing in the Sea of Japan. 

While the Joe Biden administration condemned the test, it has largely ignored the Korean nuclear file since coming to power and has done little to advance diplomacy on the peninsula. Late in 2021, South Korean President Moon Jae-in attempted to broker an official end to the Korean War, which was never terminated with a formal armistice or treaty. It does not appear his effort will be successful before the end of his term next month, however.

The latest missile test follows a call on Saturday between North Korean leader Kim Jong-un and his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping. A North Korean readout of the call said the two nations agreed to strengthen bilateral ties under “a new situation,” though gave no indication of what that could mean. 

“In the new situation, the Chinese side, together with the Korean side, will promote the continuous development of the friendly and cooperative Sino-DPRK relationship,” the readout said, calling to promote “peace, stability, development and prosperity in the region.”

The missile test and North Korean announcement come soon after the conclusion of the Chinese-hosted Olympics in Beijing. After conducting a flurry of seven tests in January, Sunday’s launch was Pyongyang’s first since the start of the games.

Facebook, Twitter Greenlight Ukrainian Neo-Nazi Posts

Facebook, Twitter Greenlight Ukrainian Neo-Nazi Posts

The Azov Battalion is an essential element of the Ukrainian National Guard that America has supported with numerous weapon shipments. It is also a neo-Nazi militia that has been fighting separatist forces in Ukraine’s eastern Donbass region since 2014.

azov

Ukrainian fighters stand alongside the logo of the Azov Battalion, which features Nazi-inspired ‘Wolfsangel’ and ‘Black Sun’ symbols.

Once on Facebook’s ‘Dangerous Individuals and Organizations’ list which barred any discussion of Azov on the platform, users will now be able to feely praise the group. The Intercept reports

According to internal policy materials reviewed by The Intercept, Facebook will “allow praise of the Azov Battalion when explicitly and exclusively praising their role in defending Ukraine OR their role as part of the Ukraine’s National Guard.” Internally published examples of speech that Facebook now deems acceptable include “Azov movement volunteers are real heroes, they are a much needed support to our national guard”; “We are under attack. Azov has been courageously defending our town for the last 6 hours”; and “I think Azov is playing a patriotic role during this crisis.”

Twitter also appeared to be on board with allowing the militia to spread its bigoted views. In a post from the verified Ukrainian National Guard account on Sunday, a video shows an Azov soldier dipping a bullet in pig lard to kill Muslims fighting for Russia, who he describes as “Orcs.” (Islamic doctrine forbids the consumption of pork.) 

However, some 12 hours after the tweet went live, Twitter appended a disclaimer to the post noting that it had violated the site’s “rules about hateful conduct,” but added that it would remain accessible as the information “may be in the public’s interest.”

The Facebook and Twitter policies are in line with comments from former Pentagon official Evelyn Farkas, who told Newsweek “They have right now existential issues to deal with, and the far-right groups are helping defend Ukraine.”

“So at this moment in time, the Ukrainian government needs all the help it can get from its citizens, regardless of their ideology,” she added.

US Troops Will Not Fight in Ukraine ‘in any scenario,’ White House says

US Troops Will Not Fight in Ukraine ‘in any scenario,’ White House says

President Joe Biden has no plans to send American soldiers to fight on Ukrainian soil, the White House said, though continued to warn of stiffer sanctions on Russia should it “further invade” its neighbor. 

“The president has no intention of sending the US military or US troops to fight in Ukraine,” White House press secretary Jen Psaki told reporters at a Wednesday press briefing. “That is not a decision the president is going to make. We are not going to be in a war with Russia or putting military troops on the ground fighting Russia.”

The comments follow Moscow’s decision to recognize two break-away republics in Ukraine’s eastern Donbass region and deploy soldiers for a “peacekeeping mission” following years of civil conflict between separatist forces and the US-backed Ukrainian state.

Psaki insisted that the administration is standing up for “bedrock democratic values against the aggression of a dictator threatening to further invade a sovereign country,” vowing to impose “serious costs” on the Russian economy through sanctions should President Vladimir Putin take additional action. 

Western leaders have for months predicted an “imminent” incursion into Ukraine, and though the White House initially refrained from describing Russia’s latest actions as an “invasion,” it has since reversed course and stated that one is underway.

While the press secretary repeatedly said that Russian forces are “in an attack position” and “capable of operationalizing at any point in time,” when pressed by a reporter on whether Washington would send soldiers in the event of a full-scale invasion by Moscow, Psaki nearly lost her patience. 

“I don’t know how many more times I can say it. There is no scenario – the president is not sending US troops to fight in Ukraine against Russia,” she said.

Biden has deployed some 6,000 soldiers throughout Europe amid the latest bout of tension, and has since repositioned some nearer to Russia’s borders, in Baltic states Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia. On Wednesday, Pentagon spokesman John Kirby said they include an 800-troop infantry task force, up to eight F-35 fighter jets and more than 30 attack helicopters.

“The additional personnel are being repositioned to reassure our NATO allies, deter any potential aggression against NATO member states and train with host nation forces,” Kirby said, stressing that the movements are “temporary” and merely part of the “more than 90,000 US troops” already in Europe.

The administration earlier imposed a series of penalties on some 50 Russian financial firms, subsidiaries and individuals, and issued an executive order barring all US business activity in the separatist-held Donetsk and Luhansk regions. Moscow has vowed to retaliate with its own “calculated” actions, though offered few details on what that would entail.

Tel Aviv Bombs Damascus, Violating Syria’s Sovereignty with Silent US Consent

Tel Aviv Bombs Damascus, Violating Syria’s Sovereignty with Silent US Consent

With the world’s eyes on Ukraine, Israel has carried out strikes on Syria for two consecutive nights. Thursday’s early morning attack is the third in the past week and, according to Syrian state media, the strikes killed three soldiers stationed somewhere near the national capital of Damascus. 

The night prior, Israel targeted the southern city of Quneitra and inflicted material damage, with missiles reportedly fired from the occupied Golan Heights. 

The recent strikes are part of hundreds of Israeli air raids on Syria launched over the past decade. Each attack erodes the Syrian army’s ability to fight the many jihadist groups still active in the country – some of which previously enjoyed American support.

Tensions over Ukraine have stoked anxiety in Tel Aviv, as Israel maintains good ties with the US, Russia and Ukraine. Israel fears that US sanctions on Russia could curb its ability to carry out strikes in Syria, possibly explaining why it has bombed the country twice since Russia recognized the independence of two separatist republics in the Donbas and launched a military intervention on their behalf. 

While the US has cited Russia’s breach of Ukraine’s “sovereignty and territorial integrity” as justification for the deluge of recent sanctions, it has never once condemned Israel for its repeated violation of Syria’s, let alone impose penalties over it. 

 

Podcasts

scotthortonshow logosq

coi banner sq2@0.5x

liberty weekly thumbnail

Don't Tread on Anyone Logo

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

Pin It on Pinterest