Blog

Mises on Equality and Inequality

“The liberal champions of equality under the law were fully aware of the fact that men are born unequal and that it is precisely their inequality that generates social cooperation and civilization. Equality under the law was in their opinion not designed to correct the inexorable facts of the universe and to make natural inequality disappear. It was, on the contrary, the device to secure for the whole of mankind the maximum of benefits it can derive from it. Henceforth no man-made institutions should prevent a man from attaining that station in which he can best serve his fellow citizens.”

—Ludwig von Mises, Human Action

Woke Club Rules

colonizer

The anti-human creed of woketopia appears to be on the ropes.

First Rule of Woke Club: you have zero accountability for any personal failure or rake-stomping you do.

Second Rule of Woke Club: whatever skin suit you wear, your core being is victim-hood.

Third Rule of Woke Club: everyone must worship your mental illness.

You’re welcome.

Email me at cgpodcast@pm.me

The Worker as Free Person

“In the market economy the worker sells his services as other people sell their commodities. The employer is not the employee’s lord. He is simply the buyer of services which he must purchase at their market price. Of course, like every other buyer an employer too can take liberties. But if he resorts to arbitrariness in hiring or discharging workers, he must foot the bill. An employer or an employee entrusted with the management of a department of an enterprise is free to discriminate in hiring workers, to fire them arbitrarily, or to cut down their wages below the market rate. But in indulging in such arbitrary acts he jeopardizes the profitability of his enterprise or his department and thereby impairs his own income and his position in the economic system. In the market economy such whims bring their own punishment. The only real and effective protection of the wage earner in the market economy is provided by the play of the factors determining the formation of prices. The market makes the worker independent of arbitrary discretion on the part of the employer and his aides. The workers are subject only to the supremacy of the consumers as their employers are too. In determining, by buying or abstention from buying, the prices of products and the employment of factors of production, consumers assign to each kind of labor its market price.

“What makes the worker a free man is precisely the fact that the employer, under the pressure of the market’s price structure, considers labor a commodity, an instrument of earning profits. The employee is in the eyes of the employer merely a man who for a consideration in money helps him to make money. The employer pays for services rendered and the employee performs in order to earn wages. There is in this relation between employer and employee no question of favor or disfavor. The hired man does not owe the employer gratitude; he owes him a definite quantity of work of a definite kind and quality.”

—Ludwig von Mises, Human Action

Labor as Commodity

For the individual actor, “as for everyone, other people’s labor as offered for sale on the market is nothing but a factor of production. Man deals with other people’s labor in the same way that he deals with all scarce material factors of production. He appraises it according to the principles he applies in the appraisal of all other goods. The height of wage rates is determined on the market in the same way in which the prices of all commodities are determined. In this sense we may say that labor is a commodity. The emotional associations which people, under the influence of Marxism, attach to this term do not matter. It suffices to observe incidentally that the employers deal with labor as they do with commodities because the conduct of the consumers forces them to proceed in this way.”

—Ludwig von Mises, Human Action

WarNotes: A Conflict Podcast Debuts Soon

wn cover

I am debuting an occasional broadcast called WarNotes: A Conflict Podcast in the next week.
It allows me to expand my inquiry into the martial phenomenon beyond the strictures of the niche irregular warfare rubric I labor under in Chasing Ghosts.
I’ll dabble in history, contemporary mayhem and conflict futurism as my path-finding takes me on different azimuths.
Stay tuned.

The Earth is shifting; stay ahead of the curve.

My Substack

Email me at cgpodcast@pm.me

Failing Upward: PR Stunt Backfires

j35pao

The genius public relations mandarins at the Joint F35 program office apparently can’t identify the aircraft they have wasted hundreds of billions of dollars on.

The picture above appears to be the Chinese J35 facsimile of the F35.

You can’t make this up. The chaos avalanche is increasing in severity weekly.

We have many questions. Mainly: Where did those twin engines on the JPO image come from? The F-35 uses a single Pratt & Whitney F135 turbofan engine (in two different variants, depending on the aircraft), whereas the fighter in the JPO tweet appears to resemble the twin-engine Chinese People’s Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) J-35 fighter jet more than anything else.

Unfortunately, this sort of public affairs flub happens all too often. For July 4th last year, the U.S. Pacific Fleet’s official account tweeted a photo that appeared to show the silhouettes of a Russian Kashin-class destroyer and five Sukhoi-27s fighter jets against the backdrop of an American flag with the command’s Independence Day message. Back in 2021, the Naval Criminal Investigative Service used a photo composite showing an American flag alongside a Russian Kirov-class battle-cruiser to wish the U.S. Navy a happy birthday, the very same mistake Republican Rep. Brian Mast also made back in 2019.

Still, this is quite embarrassing – especially on Veterans Day. But between missed readiness goals and rising costs, it makes sense that the F-35 JPO has other stuff to focus on other than accurately representing its primary aircraft on social media.

f35$

https://www.military.com/off-duty/pentagons-f-35-office-has-no-idea-what-f-35-looks.html

Email me at cgpodcast@pm.me

Why We Need to End the Federal Reserve System

Why We Need to End the Federal Reserve System

When I first started learning about how the Federal Reserve system works, I watched an excellent short documentary from the Mises Institute titled Money, Banking, and the Federal Reserve, which was released in 1996 (a transcript of the video is available here, or as a PDF file here). That video was also one of my early introductions to the great Ron Paul, whom I also later came to admire for his sensible views on foreign policy. If you have never seen it, I highly encourage you to watch it.

Last month, the Mises Institute released a new 40-minute documentary titled Playing with Fire: Money, Banking, and the Federal Reserve, which reiterates the need to end this government-legislated private monopoly over the currency supply, including by taking a look at how the Fed has expanded its own power since the 2008 financial crisis, which was precipitated by the collapse of the housing bubble that the Fed blew up with its inflationary monetary policy.

The new documentary explains the importance of sound money as a medium of exchange and a unit of account and how the central banking system engages in legalized counterfeiting to manipulate people’s borrowing and spending behaviors for the benefit of the few at the expense of everyone else in society.

This system arose from banks issuing paper certificates redeemable for gold deposited in their vaults, where in time the bankers, realizing that only a certain proportion of depositors ever came in to withdraw their money in any given period of time, began lending out paper certificates backed by nothing.

Under the “fractional reserve” monetary system, the Federal Reserve expands the base money supply by monetizing government debt, purchasing Treasury securities with dollars created out of thin air. In other words, the Fed exists to engage in legalized counterfeiting, which of course the government loves because it enables politicians to engage in insane amounts of spending without having to directly tax the public. Instead, the spending is paid for through the “hidden tax” of inflation.

us debt clock

From that monetary base, other banks then further expand the money supply by issuing loans. One misconception is that banks lend depositors’ money, so that if a $1,000 deposit is made, the bank can loan out $900 of it and keep $100 in reserve. Instead, what happens is from that $1,000 deposit, the bank can lend $9,000 created out of thin air while maintaining the legal reserve requirement.

Under this system of legalized counterfeiting, the banks are inherently insolvent, which is why there exists the risk of a “bank run” in which a mass panic causes everyone at once to go try to withdraw their money, but since only a certain proportion of that money actually exists in tangible form, the inherent insolvency is exposed, and bank failure occurs.

The Fed was created in 1913 by an act of government legislature with the stated aim of stabilizing the banking system, but instead it has given us permanent inflation as a feature of the economy and the cycle of booms and busts characterized by illusory economic growth that is really an unsustainable misallocation of resources that is inevitably followed by a market correction known as a recession.

We’re supposed to view the recession as the problem that the Fed will cure by doing what it always does, which is to print more money, creating artificial demand for Treasury securities that pushes interest rates down below where they would otherwise be if determined by the market. Actually, the recession is the cure for the unsustainable boom caused by the Fed’s monetary inflation and manipulation of interest rates, which are a critical price in the economy signaling to investors and entrepreneurs how scarce resources ought to be allocated.

The documentary explains the Austrian theory of the business cycle using the appropriate analogy of the Fed acting as both the fireman arriving on the scene to put the fire out and as the arsonist who started the fire in the first place.

Through its monetary manipulation, the Fed creates winners and losers in the economy. Those who get the new money first at low rates are able to use it to buy up assets before the resulting price increases, while everyone else in society is robbed of their purchasing power, thus effecting an upward transfer of wealth from the poor and middle class to the politically connected financial elites.

Then, of course, when the banks do get into trouble during times of economic crisis, they get bailed out at the public’s expense. As explained in the video, the profits are privatized while the losses are socialized. The biggest losers are the average American workers and families.

Since the COVID‑19 pandemic, we continue to see the economic devastation and soaring price inflation described by the mainstream media as a consequence of “the pandemic” or “the virus” when in fact it was caused by the government deliberately shutting down the economy and spending trillions of dollars created out of thin air to try to keep things going.

It was the lockdown insanity and the Fed’s monetary inflation that caused the housing affordability crisis that clueless politicians try to blame on the free market, including the claim that it is a failure of the market to produce enough supply of houses, which isn’t true, as I discussed in my October 19 article “Kamala Harris’s Economic Ignorance and the Housing Affordability Crisis”, and as economist Thomas Eddlem demonstrates graphically at The Libertarian Institute in his November 5 article “The Myth of an American Housing Shortage”.

It wasn’t the free market that caused the median sale price for an existing home to soar from $273,342 in 2019 to $414,701 in 2023!

The Mises film also discusses the threat of a central bank digital currency (CBDC), which always brings to my mind the passage from the book of Revelation about how Satan would deceive the world and cause all to “to receive a mark” so that “no one might buy or sell except one who has the mark or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.”

As noted in the video, “An increase in the money supply does not benefit society. It benefits some at the expense of others.” And as the great Ron Paul says, if you want to have sound money and a healthy economy, just get rid of the Fed.

To learn more about how the Federal Reserve’s monetary inflation caused the housing bubble that precipitated the 2008 financial crisis, read my short book Ron Paul vs. Paul Krugman: Austrian vs. Keynesian Economics in the Financial Crisis, which was described by the financial weekly Barron’s as both funny and informative, conveying “more insight into the causes and cures of business cycles than most textbooks”.

Cross-posted from JeremyRHammond.com.

Podcasts

scotthortonshow logosq

coi banner sq2@0.5x

liberty weekly thumbnail

Don't Tread on Anyone Logo

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

Pin It on Pinterest