Blog

Crash Chronicles: Fat Amy Continues the Cringe

f35crashed

One billion dollars for twisted metal for ten F35 crashes, soon you’re talking real money.screenshot 2024 12 02 at 07 09 10 a closer look at the record of f 35 fighter jet crashes

The incident rate with respect the US Air Force (USAF) has continued to decline since the 1950s as safety practices have increased and technology has matured. During the 1950s, approximately 23.6 aircraft were destroyed per 100,000 flying hours, this continually declined through to 1960s when the number of aircraft destroyed per 100,000 flying hours dropped to approximately 4.3.

That’s an impressive record.

And then the F35 stumbles on the stage. And remember, this is peacetime and not wartime.

Ten losses and the majority are pilot error which is a reflection of training and the increasing pressure on the forces to “diversify” the cockpit (can I say that?) from 2018 to 2024.

F-35 Crash incidents from 2022 to 2024

Of the 10 incidents listed, six were due to pilot error and three were due to mechanical issues, and the final incident (May 28, 2024), the author could not determine the cause of the crash.

https://simpleflying.com/f-35-fighter-jet-crashes-record/

My Substack

Email me at cgpodcast@pm.me

The Royal Navy Shrinks to Insignificance

A crashed RN F35 on the seafloor.*

My readers knew all of this already; the Royal Navy will not be mission effective as a blue water navy after 2030 and the era of aircraft carriers is over.

Eight billion dollars for future fish apartments.

Eight billion dollars.

Kit Klarenberg goes into exquisite and painful detail on the lack of planning, shortsightedness and criminal negligence in being complete unaware of the Revolutions in Military Affairs (RMA) that are foreshadowing surface navies quickly demolished and sunk by munitions a fraction of the cost of these doomed capital ships.

Western military hegemony will sunset in your life time and the sun set on the British Empire quite awhile ago.

On November 15th, The Times published a remarkable report, revealing serious “questions” are being asked about the viability of Britain’s two flagship aircraft carriers, at the highest levels of London’s defence establishment. Such perspectives would have been unmentionable mere months ago. Yet, subsequent reporting seemingly confirms the vessels are for the chop. Should that come to pass, it will represent an absolutely crushing, historic defeat for the Royal Navy – and the US Empire in turn – without a single shot being fired.

The HMS Queen Elizabeth and HMS Prince of Wales first set sail in 2017 and 2019 respectively, after 20 years in development. The former arrived at the Royal Navy’s historic Portsmouth base with considerable fanfare, a Ministry of Defence press release boasting that the carrier would be deployed “in every ocean around the world over the next five decades.” The pair were and remain the biggest and most expensive ships built in British history, costing close to $8 billion combined. Ongoing operational costs are likewise vast.

 

He goes on:

As elite US foreign policy journal National Interest acknowledged in March 2024, “the Royal Navy remains unable to adequately defend or operate” its two carriers “independently” – code for the Empire being consistently compelled to deploy its own naval and air assets to support the pair. This is quite some failure, given British officials originally intended for the vessels to not only lead NATO exercises and deployments, but “slot into” US navy operations wherever and whenever necessary.

The Empire’s inability to outsource its hegemonic duties to Britain has precipitated a critical “carrier gap”. Despite maintaining an 11-strong fleet, Washington cannot deploy the vessels to every global flashpoint at once, grievously undermining her power and influence at a time of tremendous upheaval worldwide. In a bitter irony, by encouraging and facilitating London’s emulation of its own flawed and outdated reliance on aircraft carriers, the US has inadvertently created yet another needy imperial dependant, further draining its already fatally overstretched military resources.

Read the whole thing and you will find the captured defense journalism class won’t utter these words.

https://www.kitklarenberg.com/p/collapsing-empire-rip-royal-navy?r=24rayn&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

* The F-35 the Brits crashed was due to their failure to remove one of the inlet plugs, which the MOD calls “intake blanks.” It’s bright orange and covers the entire air inlet. Impossible to miss unless everyone was drunk or British. In this case, it wasn’t the F-35’s fault. The MOD clown posse admitted this in a report.

My Substack

Email me at cgpodcast@pm.me

Becoming the French Bulldog

Becoming the French Bulldog

I could hear it, the snarling struggle to live as deformed nostrils fought for each breath. A snarl of liquid flesh flapping about, then a mild grow. Such a process just for an intake of air. The weather was not too hot though it’s tongue dragged from it’s mouth. Drool and the essence of life leaving it with each and every desperate breathe. Four short legs barely carrying it’s barrel chested frame. Tied to a leash, as a human owner dragged it across the grass. Usually it was carried. Any walk over a short distance, simply too far. Too much.

“Oh, isn’t he cute.”

“I want one! So adorable.”

The helpless creature struggled to drink water as it dripped from a bottle into it’s mouth. Cute. Bat like ears that stood upwards like a bird tormented with it’s inability to fly. Though those ears are prone to infections. A smushy face that leads to obstructed airways, heat stroke and skin issues. Chronic stomach problems so that it must be fed particular food, in a certain manner. Gorgeous. That little walk of struggle often ends in hip dysplasia and joint issues. Not to mention such a distinct shape from generations of breeding leads to spine problems. Numerous eye problems are caused by it’s weeping windows of innocence. Eyes that hide all the pain from human selective breeding. A cruelty that is widely adored. The devious design of such a creature makingit prone to brain tumours and endless dental problems.

Health and self reliance not a consideration when it comes to a dependent pet. Humans picking animals out based on their preferences for such deformations and pained disfigurements. The suggestive nature of taste decides that a look or shape, is more importance than the animals health and abilities to live. Docile and dependent are much more suited for the human master. It makes the human owner feel needed, important. A fur baby. A child that is desperate in it’s constant inability to live outside of human guardianship. To be fed and medicated constantly. Not dangerous or energetic, barely alive.

The wolf, dingo and wild dogs a distant and almost unrecognisable relation. Those creatures thrive and survive. Nature is cruel in it’s demand for survival. Is humanity benevolent in creating creatures solely for the purpose of painful and sick dependence. To promote deformations and weak lines of mutation so that one can point at such a helpless critter and consider it, cute and adorable. Does that mean the healthy, the self reliant, are repulsive, ugly or not appreciated because they don’t need a master, they don’t need to surrender into sick dependency. It’s a vulgar eugenics.

A few months ago I was talking to a man whose profession was children’s health. He had spent years in opulent Western nations and in what was once called the Third World helping the young find health and to live. He said that in the past decades he had noticed an uneasy trend in regards to the health of children in Australia.

Humanity has gone from being a wolf, but now our children are more often becoming the French Bulldog.”

Perhaps that is fitting. Much of accepted and valued society is to be dependent. To live at the expense of others. To despise health in it’s true sense. To professionalise every aspect of a child’s life to adulthood. To blanket the world in layers meant to protect, to secure and make safe so that now sicknesses and allergies are so common place. That in some perverse situations it’s now financially in a parent’s best interest to have a child with conditions with benefits attached to them. Those seeking self-reliance and health are punished, while those dependent are incentivised.

I’m sure if the ‘Frenchie’ could talk it would tell you all about it’s conditions and ailments. For now, that’s the domain of human beings to make certain each and every one of us know what tier on any given mental health spectrum they are placed, what illnesses and what conditions they have. As many acronyms as benefit schemes attached to them. The more monetarily rewarding under welfare structures and the most likely you will be told by the ‘sufferer’ or the parents. We are becoming the French Bulldog.

What will the future generations bring for the dog? No longer bred for purpose and utility and health but rather to be a lap creature and a backyard prisoner or locked away inside except for those excursions to the shops. To be a comforter for human ‘mental health’. What’s the inevitability?

And for humanity, the young and to be born. The future, what’s the ultimate ambition? To be prisoners of professionals and regulations, to shun nature and living for fear of everything. Maybe the critics of Darwin are right but for the wrong reasons. Evolution is not so much the survival of the fittest but merely the adaption to how one lives. It’s taboo to comment on the state of dogs, bred for a certain ‘aesthetic’ purpose but it’s beyond forbidden to make such an observation in relation to the health and raising of children. For a litany of reasons it is now a sacred cow or bulldog.  I guess in the end, all that matters is that they are so cute and adorable.

Are we already fighting WWIII? Welcome to the Circus! Watch the New Episode of the Kyle Anzalone Show

Welcome back to the Kyle Anzalone Show! In today’s explosive episode, we look into the escalating tensions that have many questioning whether we are on the brink of World War III. The recent transfer of long-range missiles from the US to Ukraine marks a significant escalation in an already volatile conflict with Russia. As President Vladimir Putin responds with threats and military action, including hypersonic strikes against Ukrainian facilities, it’s clear that this situation is rapidly deteriorating.

We’ll explore how these developments reflect a broader strategy by the Biden administration and what they mean for international relations moving forward. With Putin asserting his right to target military installations in countries supporting Ukraine’s offensive capabilities, concerns about global security are at an all-time high.

Additionally, we’ll analyze key insights from a recent New York Times article that sheds light on the Biden administration’s mindset regarding this crisis and its potential implications for future conflicts. Are we witnessing a dangerous miscalculation? How does this align with past administrations’ approaches to foreign policy?

Finally, we unpack the controversy surrounding Tulsi Gabbard and allegations of her being a Russian asset. Could her foreign policy stance shape a future Trump administration? Don’t miss this deep dive into the intricate web of global politics, where every decision carries profound consequences.

John Boyd: Patterns of Conflict

johnboyd

COL John Boyd was a singular mind in military matters and had a terrific impact on shattering some of the myths that have made the American military art since 1945 so awful and mired in defeat.

Boyd was a heavy intellectual lifter in innovative ideas and one of the design inspirations for the F16.

Like COL Douglas Macgregor, he was such a maverick, they had no chance of getting into the august flag ranks because they possessed innovative martial imagination, a mastery of their craft and did not care to spend their professional waking hours in Machiavellian whispers and palace intrigue. It is one reason why the flag officers in America consistently lose wars, they are professionally incapable of winning conflicts with a spotless track record of stalemate and defeat.

So, if you get a chance, take a gander at Boyd’s legendary slide deck that examined his theories of patterns of conflict.

Patterns of Conflict

My Substack

Email me at cgpodcast@pm.me

Economics and Everyday Life, 2

“[E]conomic relations constitute a machinery by which men devote their energies to the immediate accomplishment of each other’s purposes in order to secure the ultimate accomplishment of their own, irrespective of what those purposes of their own may be, and therefore irrespective of the egoistic or altruistic nature of the motives which dictate them and which stimulate efforts to accomplish them. And the things and doings with which economic investigation is concerned will therefore be found to include everything which enters into the circle of exchange—that is to say, everything with which men can supply each other, or which men can do for each other, in what we may call an impersonal capacity; or, in other words, the things a man can give to or do for another independently of any personal and individualised sympathy with him or with his motives or reasons.”

—Philip H. Wicksteed, The Commonsense of Political Economy, 1910

Anti-War Blog – She Was Only Ten Years Old

Anti-War Blog – She Was Only Ten Years Old

She was only ten years of age. A girl. A daughter. Innocent. Tala Abu Ajwa was roller skating in early September when Israeli government missiles took her life, along with several other civilians. The image of Tala’s pink roller skates still attached to her young body should haunt us. Remind us that war is evil. But she died weeks ago, the cycle has moved on. Many more have died, she is less relevant to outsiders than Katty Perry’s backpack kid. Apparently for many, less relevant as well.

Earlier this year we heard a small girl weep, “I miss bread.” Another had her little body pulled from a building, bits of her falling to the ground. Other children sniped from afar, the trained government shooters blowing their brains out. During the war on the people of Yemen, the image of a little boy covered in the remnant flesh of his family, sitting alone in fear and shock while his image is frozen in time to be mostly forgotten. Just like the children a decade ago face down while the Mediterranean waves washed over them, in that moment Syrian refugees were more than just ‘fighting age males.’ But moments online for those with the privilege to bear witness through a screen.

Except these are real people. Not memes to be digested in a moment, disregarded to the feed and forgotten. They are human beings locked inside a purgatory that is not of their own creation. To the cynical lovers of government she was collateral damage in the most kindest of their terminologies or to the extremists, she deserved to die. ‘They started it!’ ‘They voted in Hamas!’

Apparently those elections all those years ago, that occurred when most of the population in Palestine were not even born or were too young at the time to even vote, are validation to murder. A pariah government ruling them means that they are forfeit. Then does this mean everyone who is born beneath a democratic, or any government deserve to suffer because of the policies and actions of that said government? It’s a question constantly asked by those of us who despise war and collectivism. But those who seem to love both, want it both ways in their favour. Death and injustice for them, complicated nuance for ‘us’.

Soon that may not matter, no room for nuance. The civilised perfection of warfare has developed weapons so destructive that theories arose to ensure their existence but not use. Mutually Assured Destruction was meant to reason nation states away from nuclear war. The early Cold War of the twentieth century went through frightening periods of brinkmanship, adverted through diplomacy, compromise and communication. Other near misses when individuals defied doctrine and standard operating procedures prevented mass death by breaking the rules.

Brinkmanship has returned, except the communication between the belligerents are not there to be had. Liberal democracies now use war and nuclear death to strengthen domestic respect. The population so drunk on inept reporting and the mainstream narrative that we are not even sleepwalking close to war, but Naruto running into it. To even discuss peace or consider others perspectives is barely viable. Stupidity and binary thinking in a supposedly non-binary world has turned everything into automated idiocy.

One can not like a foreign government without wanting to obliterate the entire population. The total war lovers look fondly at World War Two, Korean War, Vietnam and the war on Terror with an assurance that mass murdering civilians is acceptable. Mass bombings and starvation of millions of human beings is taught and understood to be the right thing to do. The greater good. The inevitability of such acceptance that some nations can mass murder so many innocent people has led to a point of such momentous hubris that nuclear war is not even frightening to the public any more.

The fictions of the twentieth century delved into dystopian and post war settings, where cautionary tales were told about the dangers of technologies so powerful that all life was the enemy to be exterminated. Societies so addicted to war that they remained permanently in a state of conflict, even if the war was focused inwards and victory only existed so long as the State remained all powerful. These were not meant to be prophecies or blue prints, in an era of literacy this was to frighten us all. But now we don’t read. We don’t seem to care much at all. Not about Tala or any other child over there, let alone the very real dangers of nuclear powers expressing such animosity without diplomatic dialogue.

War is horrible. Don’t let those who lust for it tell you otherwise. Wars require lies to begin them, they need fear of the other and a sense of glory to feed them. The wars are never over by Christmas, and when it is on such a grand scale it’s devastating. The Russian-Ukranian war has a death toll deep into the hundreds of thousands, the legacy of that war will harm future generations. It is the first major peer versus peer war since Iran-Iraq fought through much of the 1980s and that was a horrible and dirty war, modern technology merged with World War One trench and gas warfare.

The next peer versus peer war will not be won by wonder weapons and high technology, it will be lost by everyone.

The tragedy is that Tala, just wanted to play on her roller skates despite the pangs of hunger and the miserable world around her. A government hated her so much, it’s paid professionals held that much disdain for her that they murdered her. She did nothing wrong, her crime according to her killers, was that she was born at all. The real estate that she skated on is drenched in the blood and tears of too many children and someday, it may be developed into skyscrapers by the conquerors. But so long as ideology intoxicates, national pride invigorates and the religion of the State inspires, millions of little kids like Tala will die. It is the sacrifice of the innocent. And should the next big war occur, then maybe everyone else will die too.

CG Announcement November 2024

hannibal bespoke

Me contemplating the Herculean task before me…

I will be pausing Chasing Ghosts from its fortnightly cadence of issuance for the remainder of the year.

I am taking the time to regroup and focus on the new occasional podcast, WarNotes: A Conflict Podcast as a companion podcast focusing on conventional conflict and strategic thought. My first WarNotes series will be a comprehensive survey of how to fix the broken, shattered and most expensive paper tiger in the history of the world, the US military complex.

The Fixing Fight Club series will be weekly until I finish the survey.

I think the new election results may be the time for the western military complexes to take a knee and refocus and re-calibrate strategic and grand strategic opportunities in addressing the real-time shortfalls in facing Revolutions in Military Affairs (RMA) that are littering the battlefields of the 21st century.

The US is at a crossroads: continue to invest and spend on exquisite platforms that will simply be missile sponges in the emerging salvo competition landscape or retool a more thoughtful application of military power in concert with rationally extrapolating second and third order effects to stymie the pristine track record of military failure and stalemate since 1945.

I suggest the American military complex has a mere generation to reset its arthritic, sclerotic and top heavy platforms and stratagems before irrelevance and abject systemic military failure becomes the sole avenue left.

You can find the WarNotes podcast at my substack or look for it on your podcast vendor of choice.

My Substack

Email me at cgpodcast@pm.me

Podcasts

scotthortonshow logosq

coi banner sq2@0.5x

liberty weekly thumbnail

Don't Tread on Anyone Logo

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

Pin It on Pinterest