Blog

Tyson vs Paul- We all Run out of Time

Tyson vs Paul- We all Run out of Time

Netflix put on its first boxing event, it’s content was plugged from Squid Games to Cobra Kai and Mike Tyson, 58 years of age, fought Jake Paul, 27 years of age. A battle of nostalgia versus the modern celebrity culture that has used boxing well as a promotion platform, and to show that the combat sports are trapped in an identity miasma.

Despite MMA for the past three decades being touted as the ‘fastest growing sport’ and the UFC becoming a brand synonymous with the sport itself, the big money is still in boxing. The more mature sport can still give former MMA stars a better payday inside the squared ring than they ever could have found in the cageduring their prime. And on the Paul-Tyson under-card it is safe to say that each boxer was paid better than most UFC main eventers. They also received tremendous exposure on the Netflix platform which provided the livestream as part of the subscription package.

Jake and Logan Paul have become a brand that is both embraced and despised, a symbiosis of fuck-hatred that fuels their wealth. The brothers understand this dynamic and have agitated their way to fame from Vine to YouTube and beyond, childrenwith screens in faces made them rich and famous beyond imagination. Though, the Paul’s work hard and train properly as athletes. They have perhaps more discipline than some professional sports players. Because of their origins they will forever be slurred as “YouTubers”. But tomorrow’s Mr Beast will likely be the kingmaker when the forever screen watching children grow to be adults.

As is often the case whenever one of these spectacles roll around it’s from those who never watch boxing who have the biggest opinions, decreeing with excitement, “did you see Tyson training”, “Paul looks shit.” There expertise generated in a second from an impression that a social media algorithm fed them. It’s unlikely those same people will ever actually watch a boxing match, until the next algorithm frenzy that draws them in.

Ironically those who hold such disdain for the Paul’s can’t come to the terms with the fact that if they had of gone the traditional route as prize fighters, it is less likely that they would be as wealthy or successful. That in itself is an indictment on the culture that loves and hates them. The spectacle seems more important than the sport itself. Perhaps it’s an indictment on the combat sports as well.

Mike Tyson was unable to pull of a George Foreman vs Moorer or even a Larry Holmes vs Mercer or Butterbean for that matter. But he went the distance, whether Paul showed empathy or not. Tyson prepared hard, took the risk and put it on the line and in an age of voyeurs that is a rare thing indeed. Besides the two prize fighters that attracted the crowds to the venue and Netflix, there was an underlying narrative of nostalgia. But as many have said, ‘Father Time goes undefeated.”

For many who tuned in for Paul and those too young to remember even his rise to prominence, Mike Tyson exists as a mythic relic that the old people revere. He is not someone whose era they experienced, they do not understand the impact and nature of his presence during his prime or even beyond it when there was hope for some that he might beat Lewis, or Williams and even McBride. Mike Tyson may as well be the 20th century itself, that period that won’t die or be allowed to. The 21st century is ashamed of itself, so instead it drugs itself with nostalgia, reboots and adaptions all creativity, ideology and reference points looks back to the past century with romance and habit. Mike Tyson was pulled from it and asked to lace up one more time so that we could see him try the near impossible, he did and failed. No shame there.

Many who wanted him to win do not know Tyson like their parents do. They either hated Paul or wanted something inspirational, magical. There is a mystical desire to see a man make his return and take on the odds, it’s inspirational. Though it is in the rarity of success which makes it all the more powerful. The underwhelming fight disappointed for sure, not just because Paul won but because Mike Tyson, was not Tyson of old, he was just an old Tyson. That is fine, it’s just hard to swallow. Despite his many moments of immodesty and disgusting acts, he has emerged as an emblem of the past. A past before the digital age of apathy but one from the information age of hope.

The main event was underwhelming despite having solid undercard fights. It will be remembered as a lacklustre event, that is what hype does. The spectacle is the sizzle and garnish rather than the steak itself, and in an Instagram age of eating experiences, that’s all that matters. The main take away is that Netflix can put on a sports promotion, granted it was full of filler and bloat and many did have streaming issues. Though I suspect that when many can’t watch anything that isn’t 5k this will always be a problem with so many streaming in. Or would it be streaming out? Either way, if they made money then it should put some of the other promotions on notice.

It is likely that the usual parasites that infect the host of combat sports got their cut and made money ,but it seems like the fighters did as well. A refreshing statement and if the Paul’s and their partners achieved anything it was a victory in that regard. Love him or hate him, Jake Paul will most likely retire in better physical and financial health than many fighters who worked the orthodox path. He transcended their obstacles and has been able to train better than what many of them could afford, remember many pros work day jobs. Because of his fame and established name he is able to decide the contracts and conditions, not take what he can get as many other fighters find.

The combat sports remain popular but it’s hard for fighters to keep busy and to sustain the work, regulators and bodies that insert themselves can often project a paywall between fighters and fights. The costs to run shows that promoters have to endure also ensure that fighters are not paid as well as what one might expect. And when many who claim to be fight fans seem to expect an event rather than a fight show, promotions spend money on other forms of talent and personalities to help draw in the crowds. Fighting is mostly a voyeurs sport, the disconnect between most viewers and those fighting is vast in many cases, which includes expectations of what an athlete can and should be expected to endure.

What we do know is that spectacle sells, names whether those recently gorged in fame or those ancient myths to the younger non-readers. The combat sports are and will continue to be influenced by the influencer culture. The insincere facade and acts to gain a reaction, from visiting suicide forests to creating fake scenarios for the sake of virality, the culture of make believe sold to be believed is now the culture. Fighters who are starved and hungry, will attempt to get in on anything that makes them money or gets them fights. Modesty and humility is very rarely rewarded. The mob through their screens swipe for the worse behaviour, even if it’s all just make believe. No longer do we live with a world where fighters claim that they want to make that Tyson money instead they look to make real money like a Paul brother. Any nuance or dignity that even the Paul’s may exhibit in moments of sincere humanity, as we witnessed in the closing moments of the Tyson fight are lost beneath the one million dollar trunks and make belief bluster that little boys with screens to their faces seem to adore. That is now who runs the world, at least online.

Mises on Equality and Inequality

“The liberal champions of equality under the law were fully aware of the fact that men are born unequal and that it is precisely their inequality that generates social cooperation and civilization. Equality under the law was in their opinion not designed to correct the inexorable facts of the universe and to make natural inequality disappear. It was, on the contrary, the device to secure for the whole of mankind the maximum of benefits it can derive from it. Henceforth no man-made institutions should prevent a man from attaining that station in which he can best serve his fellow citizens.”

—Ludwig von Mises, Human Action

Woke Club Rules

colonizer

The anti-human creed of woketopia appears to be on the ropes.

First Rule of Woke Club: you have zero accountability for any personal failure or rake-stomping you do.

Second Rule of Woke Club: whatever skin suit you wear, your core being is victim-hood.

Third Rule of Woke Club: everyone must worship your mental illness.

You’re welcome.

Email me at cgpodcast@pm.me

The Worker as Free Person

“In the market economy the worker sells his services as other people sell their commodities. The employer is not the employee’s lord. He is simply the buyer of services which he must purchase at their market price. Of course, like every other buyer an employer too can take liberties. But if he resorts to arbitrariness in hiring or discharging workers, he must foot the bill. An employer or an employee entrusted with the management of a department of an enterprise is free to discriminate in hiring workers, to fire them arbitrarily, or to cut down their wages below the market rate. But in indulging in such arbitrary acts he jeopardizes the profitability of his enterprise or his department and thereby impairs his own income and his position in the economic system. In the market economy such whims bring their own punishment. The only real and effective protection of the wage earner in the market economy is provided by the play of the factors determining the formation of prices. The market makes the worker independent of arbitrary discretion on the part of the employer and his aides. The workers are subject only to the supremacy of the consumers as their employers are too. In determining, by buying or abstention from buying, the prices of products and the employment of factors of production, consumers assign to each kind of labor its market price.

“What makes the worker a free man is precisely the fact that the employer, under the pressure of the market’s price structure, considers labor a commodity, an instrument of earning profits. The employee is in the eyes of the employer merely a man who for a consideration in money helps him to make money. The employer pays for services rendered and the employee performs in order to earn wages. There is in this relation between employer and employee no question of favor or disfavor. The hired man does not owe the employer gratitude; he owes him a definite quantity of work of a definite kind and quality.”

—Ludwig von Mises, Human Action

Labor as Commodity

For the individual actor, “as for everyone, other people’s labor as offered for sale on the market is nothing but a factor of production. Man deals with other people’s labor in the same way that he deals with all scarce material factors of production. He appraises it according to the principles he applies in the appraisal of all other goods. The height of wage rates is determined on the market in the same way in which the prices of all commodities are determined. In this sense we may say that labor is a commodity. The emotional associations which people, under the influence of Marxism, attach to this term do not matter. It suffices to observe incidentally that the employers deal with labor as they do with commodities because the conduct of the consumers forces them to proceed in this way.”

—Ludwig von Mises, Human Action

WarNotes: A Conflict Podcast Debuts Soon

wn cover

I am debuting an occasional broadcast called WarNotes: A Conflict Podcast in the next week.
It allows me to expand my inquiry into the martial phenomenon beyond the strictures of the niche irregular warfare rubric I labor under in Chasing Ghosts.
I’ll dabble in history, contemporary mayhem and conflict futurism as my path-finding takes me on different azimuths.
Stay tuned.

The Earth is shifting; stay ahead of the curve.

My Substack

Email me at cgpodcast@pm.me

Failing Upward: PR Stunt Backfires

j35pao

The genius public relations mandarins at the Joint F35 program office apparently can’t identify the aircraft they have wasted hundreds of billions of dollars on.

The picture above appears to be the Chinese J35 facsimile of the F35.

You can’t make this up. The chaos avalanche is increasing in severity weekly.

We have many questions. Mainly: Where did those twin engines on the JPO image come from? The F-35 uses a single Pratt & Whitney F135 turbofan engine (in two different variants, depending on the aircraft), whereas the fighter in the JPO tweet appears to resemble the twin-engine Chinese People’s Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) J-35 fighter jet more than anything else.

Unfortunately, this sort of public affairs flub happens all too often. For July 4th last year, the U.S. Pacific Fleet’s official account tweeted a photo that appeared to show the silhouettes of a Russian Kashin-class destroyer and five Sukhoi-27s fighter jets against the backdrop of an American flag with the command’s Independence Day message. Back in 2021, the Naval Criminal Investigative Service used a photo composite showing an American flag alongside a Russian Kirov-class battle-cruiser to wish the U.S. Navy a happy birthday, the very same mistake Republican Rep. Brian Mast also made back in 2019.

Still, this is quite embarrassing – especially on Veterans Day. But between missed readiness goals and rising costs, it makes sense that the F-35 JPO has other stuff to focus on other than accurately representing its primary aircraft on social media.

f35$

https://www.military.com/off-duty/pentagons-f-35-office-has-no-idea-what-f-35-looks.html

Email me at cgpodcast@pm.me

Podcasts

scotthortonshow logosq

coi banner sq2@0.5x

liberty weekly thumbnail

Don't Tread on Anyone Logo

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

Pin It on Pinterest