Blog

Politics Turns the Vile Into Content- Savile to Epstein

Politics Turns the Vile Into Content- Savile to Epstein

In 1988 authorities began their investigations into the allegations that important people from business and government were involved in child sex trafficking. It turned into a scandal. The investigations ended in 1990 when it was concluded that the allegations were unfounded. The ‘Franklin Scandal’ was mostly isolated to Nebraska. Despite victims coming forward, and witnesses confirming that businessman Lawrence E King held parties that featured the abuse of minors, it was a political hot potato. Many claimed it was a cover up.

Prominent conservative politicians attended the sex parties, reportedly participating in the sex with children. King, was a prominent power broker in the Republican Party. His business the Franklin Credit Union was raided by authorities due to the embezzlement of millions of dollars. In the 1980s, that was a lot of money. The scandal also involved the State foster care.

In true American fashion conspiracies muddied the water and expanded into claims of Satanic worship, it was the 1980s, cannibalism and ritualistic orgies. The fact that powerful adults were raping and exploiting children sexually was not enough. Rape and it is also claimed, murder and kidnap. Can’t be performed by respectable political and business men. They need to be alienated into ‘others’, in this case Satanists. The scandal is mostly forgotten, perhaps because it involved Republicans. In the post-Pizzagate era, the assumed meme is that only lefties diddle children.

It turns out that rape, murder and child exploitation is a bi-partisan thing. John Wayne Gacy was involved in the Democratic Party and Ted Bundy, a Republican. It takes political bias to debate which was worse. It is for moral principles to understand that politics has no place for justice.

No one quite exemplified conservative political values like Margaret Thatcher. Her good friend Jimmy Savile was a well known abuser of girls and young women. For decades he used his influence and relationship with Royalty, politicians and media elites to hide in plain sight. A volunteer hospital worker, where he molested and raped coma patients and took advantage of those ill. As well as being a regular visitor to a female youth prison where he was lent young girls by those running it. Common in that era, for the authorities to lease out children held in detention centres and orphanages to those who can afford their company.

Despite much evidence, witnesses and victims, Savile remained free and protected. It was only after his knighthood, then death that the public was allowed to know about his crimes. The British government, authorities and media either protected him, looked the other way but ultimately feigned ignorance once the scandalous nature of his crimes became known. Then again, the Crown and British government are not virgins when it comes to such alleged predations from Lord Mountbatten to Prince Andrew.

The public loves scandals. Tabloid fodder that used to sell magazines and newspapers but no is social media engagement bait. Scandals make for popular Netflix shows and with masturbatory delight voyeurs consume specials and podcasts about serial killers and rapists. It’s entertainment. Content. The victims are props. Background characters to a series that people keep consuming. Savile had many props that he abused and violated.

Where I am from, Adelaide, there exists lore about a child murderer who is responsible for disgusting crimes. Missing children are still attributed to him. Evidence suggests along with sleuths and conspiracy theorists claim that he is linked to local aristocracy, politicians and the judiciary. It’s local lore. The assumed truth is that he keeps his mouth shut and in turn receives perks and favourable treatment while in jail. Those who work in government, especially cops, have a tendency of spreading these theories. Though, they continue to serve. To show up to the job and enforce any law, written by these very people involved in such a conspiracy and cover up or may be involved.

Scandals, no matter how certain and vulgar are just entertainment for the non-victims. That’s it. If they weren’t then things would change right?

It turns out, despite making much of it, Trump and key officials in his regime are dismissing the Jeffrey Epstein crimes. The circumstances leading to his death, the ‘client list’ and whatever data that existed on hard drives or in clouds are all just one big Rickroll. It was content to go on podcasts about, to feed memes, to win elections. A president with a clear relationship and numerous links to Jeffrey Epstein was somehow going to be elected as the champion for truth and justice. Turns out, he was a politician and lied or simply put did what he needed to do in order to win an election. Grown adults, those with numerous elections and decades of experience of observing government and the nature of politics, fell for it. Again. The memes and content clearly were that engrossing.

Let’s pretend that President Trump did release all of the data. Faces could be seen as they soiled the youth, vulgar pornographic moments of shame and one sided gratification for us to witness. Just as we can watch parents pull torn toddlers bodies from the rubble after a government bomb destroyed their lives. What would happen? I suspect the same thing that happens when we watch those blown to pieces babies. Nothing. What is worse than babies being starved and murdered? Fucking them?

If exposed, those involved may have a ruined reputation. Some, may go to jail. Others may find a Roman Polanski refuge and continue to be admired, respected and revered by their colleagues. It would not change anything. The government would remain. It will remain as it is right now, despite each election. Despite now covering up the Epstein files, or even if they were released. Just as the British government remained despite Savile. Despite the lies that lead to an invasion of Iraq and the war on terror. Despite the information leaked by Wikileaks, Chelsea Manning, Edward Snowden. Regardless of Vault seven. Despite the Afghanistan papers, the Pentagon papers, the Church committee or the Panama papers. That’s a lot of papers. Nothing.

Nothing changes. The brave memers on social media will post about ‘woodchippers for pedos’, I have seen cops share these memes. Yet, they turn up and make sure that the rapists are protected from their victims and the wider community. That is what jail is. Not a punishment. Protection. It protects the most deplorable from their victims. From those of us, who would not tolerate them once their true nature is known. Epstein, Savile, and those involved in the Franklin scandal, they were able to function because of power, authority. Government. Not despite it.

Then there is the meme circulating among the MAGA devotees, “Would you want the Epstein files released, even if it means that Republicans went to jail.” Unashamedly, men post these things. Just as the many incarnations of Christian worship have their own histories of hiding child abuse, and protecting rapists. The faith, is more important than the victims. Just as the NKVD tortured and raped, once the winds changed, those doing the rape and tortuer turned on Lavrentiy Beria, their boss. He became the effigy. The State that made such deplorable violence possible, remained.

No matter what you know and witness. You can scroll through your feed and see plenty of injustice but it’s convenient to appeal to authority. To cuckold morality to professionals who are mostly indifferent to justice. We understand that monopolies are bad, yet most clamour to serve and support the existence of one that controls and regulates most things. If not everything.

For those who are unaware, I am writing a book. It’s about sexuality, kinks and what many would call degenerate behaviour. I have interviewed numerous people, in an attempt to humanise them or at the very least give them more than just a caricature. In the process I have spoken to two dominatrix’s who have told me about magistrates, police and politicians who pay for their services. To be humiliated and abused. One, pays a dominatrix to painfully sodomise him because of his paedophilia thoughts. He has been a judge for decades. He drives past schools on his way to work, fantasies, then hires her to shame and brutalise him.

I have spoken to gays who gave conservative memers blow jobs in the backseats of their cars only to see them go on anti-gay and anti-trans tirades later that night on social media. A sex worker who serviced a politician on his desk, hours after he had done a presser calling for the ban of pornography and sex work. Moments earlier he was on the phone to his wife. There have been men who told stories of when they were in their early teens servicing soldiers and priests. A brothel operator told me about a judge who would pay his girls to scream and spit at him while he drove them around town for an hour. I won’t even mention what happened to a gumboot. I can go on. The ‘degenerates’ and predators have a tendency to be drawn to wealth and power.

They are nothing without you, us. They are just flab in a suit, a flaccid penis in need of a blue pill or thousands of willing employees to fluff them into life. To spit their effluent from our mouths and minds takes responsibility, accountability. It’s easier to burn effigies. To blame celebrities and politicians for every ill in the world, With each election, every scandal those in government mostly keep their jobs and do whatever they need or don’t need to do, to retain those jobs. More have their hands out for welfare, expecting debt and taxation to support them. It’s an entitlement now. A dependency so taken for granted that it’s pariah to even mention it in the negative.

The worse sort of person, those who would rape kids. Those who would blow them to pieces. They continue to rule, to have jobs. To have power. Justice is not found with indifference or outsourcing indignation to a corporate conformity. The shrill call for “more funding” means, more money to those who are failing or have done wrong. And when those involved in the crime or in enabling it are charged with investigating it. Don’t be surprised. But, who am I kidding. The Epstein stuff, it’s all going to be content for podcasts, memers and streaming shows for years to come now. That’s all that matters in the end right? If you can ignore those other revelations over the years, especially those that involved mass murder, millions of civilians, then this scandal will pass on as well.

Boeing, Boeing: The Saga Continues

k46broke

 

Boeing is now a verb synonym for worthless.
 
The K46 also leaks fuel.
 
It’s a refueler bird.
 
It leaks fuel.
 
If you Boeing something, things are really fucked up.
https://www.twz.com/air/kc-46-tankers-boom-just-broke-off-during-f-22-refueling-mission
Did I mention the cracks that have grounded the fleet?
https://www.newsweek.com/air-force-kc-46-cracks-fleet-grounds-2038195

Tucker Carlson asks Scott Horton: How did we get into war with Iran?

How did we wind up at war with Iran? Scott Horton explains on The Tucker Carlson Show.

Chapters:
0:00 The History of Why Iran Is Such a Global Focal Point
11:16
The Jimmy Carter Doctrine
22:29 The Brutality of the Iraq/Iran War
29:40 The First Iraq War Was a Massive Mistake
41:32 Bill Clinton’s Fatal Mistake That Drove America Into the Middle East
47:44 The Truth About Osama bin Laden’s Motives
50:08 What You Don’t Know About the 1990s Terror Attacks
1:02:15 The History of the Israel/Iran Relationship
1:09:50 Why Osama bin Laden Was Happy When George Bush Was Elected
1:14:53 Why Is There So Much Persecution of Christians in the World?
1:16:22 Scott Horton’s Partnership With Darryl Cooper
1:24:13 Foreknowledge of 9-11
1:31:02 The Real Meaning of the Word “Neocon”
1:38:47 Israel’s Clean Break Strategy
1:46:46 The Oil Pipeline Between Iraq and Israel and Why Israel Cut It Off
2:01:50 Barack Obama’s Role in Stoking Foreign Wars
2:10:36 Corporate Media’s Sudden Pivot on Assad
2:14:43 How Obama Paved the Way for Islamic Rule of Syria
2:23:11 The Truth About Iran’s Nuclear Program
2:33:32 How Effective Was Trump’s Bombing Campaign on Iran?
2:43:46 What Happens if There Is Regime Change in Iran?
2:50:18 Is Horton Hopeful for America’s Future?

Chasing Ghosts and WarNotes Podcast Upgrades

Audio Have Nasty Background Noise ...

I have been retrofitting and improving the sound to my podcasts

WarNotes episodes are done with the Podsworth app upgrade.

Chasing Ghosts upgrades to episodes 1-3, 6, 8-26 and 58-67 are now complete (updated on RSS, Substack and the Libertarian Institute).

I know it seems rather chaotic but when I went back to reprocess, some things were missing or needed attention.

Finished uploading the remainder this morning for processing and then when the dust settles, I will see what I missed.

If I missed something you identify or any feedback, let me know.

As always, I am indebted to your listenership.

I can’t recommend Chris Williams’ service enough at Podsworth.

Interview: Israel’s Strategic Alliance with Hamas

Interview: Israel’s Strategic Alliance with Hamas

Jim Clancy and I discuss Israel’s policy of utilizing Hamas as a strategic ally to block peace negotiations with the Palestinians.

I recently had the pleasure of speaking with former CNN reporter Jim Clancy on his podcast The Brief about how Hamas really came to power in Gaza. Dispelling mainstream propaganda narratives, we detail how Hamas from the start was used by Israel as a strategic ally to block implementation of the two-state solution.

We explain how the precursor organization to Hamas, Mujama Al-Islamiya, was founded by Sheikh Ahmed Yassin as an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood, registered in Israel in 1978 as a charity organization. The group evolved into Hamas, which published its charter in 1988.

From the start, Israel showed favor to the Islamists as a counterforce to Yasser Arafat’s secular Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and the threat of peace posed by the PLO’s acceptance since the mid-70s of the two-state solution.

In 2004, Sheikh Yassin declared Hamas’s willingness to accept a Palestinian state alongside Israel along the 1949 armistice lines, also known as the 1967 lines after the June 1967 war in which Israel invaded and occupied the Palestinian territories of the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Israel’s response to Hamas’s movement away from armed conflict toward political engagement was to assassinate Yassin.

Israeli security officials criticized the assassination, warning that it would only empower the more radical extremists in Hamas and escalate the threat of terrorism. But the political calculation was that Hamas was becoming too much like the PLO in posing a threat of peace by expressing a willingness to accept Israel’s existence alongside a free Palestine.

In 2005, Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon implemented his “disengagement plan” involving an abandonment of its illegal settlement regime in Gaza to focus on its expropriating more land in the West Bank. Contrary to Zionist propaganda, this did not end Israel’s status as Occupying Power in Gaza since it continued to control Gaza’s borders, airspace, and waterways as well as continuing administrative functions. As I explained in the interview, it is also a myth that the response to Israel’s withdraw was incessant rocket fire from Hamas.

Under the 1990s Oslo Accords, the Palestinian Authority (PA) was established effectively to serve as Israel’s collaborator in enforcing its occupation regime. The PA’s corruption under President Mahmoud Abbas and his Fatah party was a key reason why Hamas became so popular in the occupied territories.

In 2005, Hamas participated in municipal elections, and in early 2006, Hamas defeated Fatah in a legislative election, resulting in a Hamas-led government in the occupied territories.

The response from Israel was to place Gaza under siege to collectively punish the civilian population while colluding with the US and Abbas to try to overthrow the democratically elected government. The result was a violent feud between Hamas and Fatah, the expulsion of Fatah from Gaza, and a division of the Palestinian leadership between Hamas in Gaza and the PA in the West Bank.

After discussing the true history of Hamas’s rise to power in Gaza, we turned our focus to the US government’s longstanding policy of supporting Israel’s crimes against the Palestinians.

I explained why the popular belief that the United Nations (UN) created Israel is a myth aimed at concealing the truth that the “Jewish state” was founded in 1948 through the ethnic cleansing of most of the Arab population from their homes in Palestine.

The US joined other Western countries in rejecting the Palestinians’ right to self-determination and immediately recognized the state of Israel after its unilateral declaration of existence on May 14, 1948, by which time a quarter million Arabs had already been ethnically cleansed from their homes.

US support for Israel escalated in 1967 after it started a war by invading Egypt and invading and occupying the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

The claim this attack was “preemptive” is another Zionist myth. Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser’s belligerent rhetoric was a face-saving reaction to being accused by allies Jordan and Syria of hiding behind UN peacekeeping forces stationed along the border since Israel’s 1956 invasion of Egypt during the Suez Crisis.

Another supposed proof of Egypt’s intent to attack Israel was its expulsion of the UN Emergency Force (UNEF), but this was again a face-saving measure after Nasser was accused of hiding behind the force, and when the proposal was made to restation UNEF on Israel’s side of the border, Israel rejected it.

The US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) observed that once Egyptian forces entered the Sinai Peninsula, often cited as proof of an intention to attack Israel, they took up defensive positions, and US President Lyndon B. Johnson was informed that if war was to break out, it would be started by Israel, which would easily defeat the combined Arab armies due to its overwhelming qualitative military superiority.

Next, I explained how the US-led so-called “peace process” was always the means by which Israel and its superpower benefactor blocked implementation of the two-state solution.

I also clarified the important distinction between the two-state solution premised upon the applicability of international law to the conflict and the goal of the “peace process”, which was premised on a rejection of international law, including a rejection of UN Security Council Resolution 242, which was passed in the wake of the 1967 war and required Israel to withdraw its occupying forces to the 1949 armistice lines.

Under the alternative framework of the “peace process”, the occupation would continue, and Palestinians were expected to negotiate with their oppressors over how much of their own land they could keep and maybe someday exercise some kind of limited autonomy over.

Mr. Clancy and I also discussed how Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, throughout his time in power, has furthered the basic policy of the “disengagement plan”, aiming for a complete takeover of the West Bank while utilizing Hamas as a strategic ally to block any movement toward peace negotiations with the Palestinians.

For maintaining that policy, Netanyahu was widely blamed in Israel for the Hamas-led attacks on October 7, 2023, dubbed “Operation Al Aqsa Flood”, a reference to Hamas’s self-described role as protector of the Al Aqsa Mosque Compound, known to Israelis as the Temple Mount, in occupied East Jerusalem.

While there were intelligence warnings and foreknowledge of Hamas’s planned operation, the Israeli leadership blinded themselves to the threat, clinging to the view that their policy was working to contain Hamas within the “huge concentration camp”, as Gaza was described in 2004 by then head of Israel’s National Security Council Giora Eiland—an outspoken voice advocating genocide after 10/7.

We also discussed the reasons for Netanyahu’s reluctance to allow an inquiry into the security failure and how real atrocities against Israeli civilians were embellished with many false claims, such as the beheading of babies and systematic rape as a weapon of war, aimed at gaining sympathetic support from the international community for Israel’s genocidal response.

It is also now evident that some—if not many—Israeli civilians were killed on 10/7 not by Hamas or other armed Palestinian groups but by IDF forces, akin to the “Hannibal Directive” developed in the 1980s whereby overwhelming force would be used to prevent soldiers from being captured, even if it meant killing the soldier. Early reports about the IDF firing indiscriminately and killing Israeli civilians from The Grayzone, Electronic Intifada, and Mondoweiss were initially dismissed as conspiracy theories but later confirmed by the Israeli newspaper Haaretz.

Clancy and I next turned our focus to the ongoing genocide in Gaza and the claim that Hamas has been stealing aid. In fact, the IDF has attacked Hamas when its security forces have tried to protect aid convoys—and the IDF has been protecting the criminal gangs actually responsible for the hijacking and looting of aid trucks.

I shared my outlook on the prospects of the international community doing something to stop the slaughter in Gaza. While there have been some moves, such as South Africa’s genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the issuance of arrest warrants for Netanyahu and former Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant by the International Criminal Court (ICC), the prospects are grim.

Most of Israeli society, polls have shown, has become genocidal. There was ceasefire agreement between Hamas and Israel earlier this year that Hamas was honoring, but President Donald Trump encouraged Israel to violate it and resume its genocidal assault, so it did. Domestically, Trump has cracked down on student protests against the genocide by threatening universities for not cracking down on free speech and threatening deportation of non-citizen activists legally in the US.

Finally, I discuss the role of the mainstream media in deceiving the public about the nature of the Israel-Palestine conflict by spreading Zionist propaganda designed to manufacture consent for the US policy of supporting the Jewish supremacist state’s crimes against the Palestinians, including the crimes against humanity of ethnic cleansing, apartheid, and now genocide.

Without US support, it could not continue, and Americans in particular among the citizens of Earth have a moral responsibility to stand up and speak out. Silence is complicity when genocide is occurring.

Related Reading

Books

Cross-posted from JeremyRHammond.com.

Podcasts

scotthortonshow logosq

coi banner sq2@0.5x

liberty weekly thumbnail

Don't Tread on Anyone Logo

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

Pin It on Pinterest