Blog

Ban “Ethnic Cleansing”

I propose that we defenders of individual rights stop using the term ethnic cleansing. Why? Because it is the sort of euphemism bad people would use to disguise what they are doing when they expel or annihilate large numbers of people viewed as members of the wrong group. The Nazis used the word hygiene when writing about “purifying” the Aryan “race.” That word was meant to soften the truth and dress it in scientific garb. But we all know what it meant. Ethnic cleansing would fit well into that lexicon.

Remember, it was the Nazis who talked like that — not the victims or outraged onlookers. They wouldn’t have called what the Nazis were doing ethnic cleansing. Why sanitize it? Cleansing is usually a good thing, isn’t it? They would have called it mass murder or mass deportation.

Why are we talking in Nazi euphemism?

The Eternal Panopticon: The State as Predator

mcchrystalmap

Lizard Farmer did an excellent synopsis of how the state stalks its prey. The observations are older but still germane.

If London had this technology in 1770, America would not have been born and Paul Revere, the Committees of Correspondence and his colleagues would have been renditioned to black sites.

“Make no mistake that over the last decade plus the DoD, DoJ, DHS, NSA, and CIA have definitely learned their lessons.  From shortly after 9/11 when the new lessons of counter-insurgency still lay ahead to the recent (last few years) capture and killing of Al Qaeda’s top officers the concepts and techniques of counter insurgency targeting have been vastly refined. Lessons learned not only on the battlefield but in the ops center have developed intelligence “exploitation systems that are genuinely lethal due to their ability to be comprehensive and timely.  Instead of sitting here typing out how these systems work I’m going to throw out a bit of a scenario for you.  Not every system is represented but hopefully I’ll depict enough of them to give you an appreciation of just how dangerous they can be.”

How They Hunt

My Substack

Email me at cgpodcast@pm.me.

Liberals Are So Horrible

Vote Vets, which was created by Democrats to cash in on opposition to Iraq War II, is now running ads attacking Republicans for holding up more billions for war in Ukraine.

They pretend that somehow American forces will have to go fight the next war for Poland or some total nonsense to justify it. Because liberals are always horrible. And liberals always lie.

Oh, they’ve “already” taken back some of the land Russia initially occupied. Yeah? And how long ago was the last time they took any? See, they’re liars. The war is lost. The only question now is if Ukraine can strike a deal before they lose Kharkiv and Odesa too. They were talking recently but Biden stopped them.

$5400

One of the terrorist-murderers captured in Moscow claimed that he was paid the equivalent of US$5400 to kill innocent people. In his native Tajikstan that is no doubt a lot of money. His willingness to kill for money is not new, the mercenary trade is one steeped in romance but also be despised. Usually depending on any given historical perspective. Though these men were murderers. Spree killers, motivated by the ideology of terror and money.

While other spree killers the world over may do their terrible deed with a vicious thrill these men are now heroes to some, because the crime is conflated with politics and has become an act of terror. Somehow terrorism transcends criminality, to the point that all the great terrorists end up becoming political parties or even governments. Terrorists making statesmen and generals, should they survive their trade long enough.

For at least one of the captured murderers it was a money job. The lives he took insignificant to his need to get paid. While what he did was visceral, vulgar, he at the very least stood there and pulled the trigger while the innocent fell before him. He heard the screams, saw the blood and smelt the smouldering of his weapons barrel. In a nihilistic age where the only true god is money, many work jobs where the outcome is as vile, the indirect damage done in a far away land, distance between their office and their victims. They are paid more, without the screams, the smell and the kick of the rifle into the shoulder. The corporate and government barrier legitimises whatever terror they may participate in, its legal not criminal. Not murder, just business. Not terrorism, simply policy. That’s how 140 dead can become several thousand, or even a million. Pay enough people and your genocide comes but with paperwork.

For some $5400 is a lot of money. Then again, I’m pretty sure drone operators get paid more. The innocent, they remain dead. Murdered by the deranged killer who did his sick deed not out of compulsion or because he was mentally broken. He did it because he was paid and maybe because of a violent ideological belief. Both of which are we have come to accept as normal, If he was a pilot in a fighter-bomber dropping bombs or a drone operator firing a missile, then to many he would be a professional. Return home a hero with battle ribbons. The dead maybe collateral or deserving, Russia is after all at war.

What’s the value of a life? To the many killers out there, the terrorists, mercenaries and professionals alike it can vary but apparently those innocent lives were worth $5400 to one man. To others, they would have done it for free. Remember that next time you kiss a loved one.

Benjamin Netanyahu’s Servile Lickspittle Donald Trump

Has there ever been a cuck with less dignity than Donald J. Trump? NYT:

Trump Advisers Talk of Palestinian Expulsions, West Bank Annexation

Even as Palestinian-rights organizers focus their ire on President Biden, the advisers who shaped Donald J. Trump’s Middle East policies when he was president have amplified calls for the expulsion of Palestinians from Gaza and the annexation of the West Bank by Israel.

Those policy prescriptions, voiced by Mr. Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner and his former ambassador to Israel, David M. Friedman, suggest a right-wing approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict exceeding even the Trump administration’s lopsidedly pro-Israeli proposals for a two-state solution. Mr. Trump was contradictory on the policies he would pursue in an interview with a conservative Israeli publication. But he did say he would be meeting with Mr. Friedman to discuss the former ambassador’s plan for Israeli annexation of the West Bank.

Podcasts

scotthortonshow logosq

coi banner sq2@0.5x

liberty weekly thumbnail

Don't Tread on Anyone Logo

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

Pin It on Pinterest