Blog

New Review Essay on Questioning the COVID Company Line

Brad Pearce (@thewaywardrabbler at Substack) has written a substantial (~4K word) and pensive essay on Questioning the COVID Company Line: Critical Thinking in Hysterical Times.questioningcovidcover3d

Opening Excerpt:

Questioning the COVID Company Line: Critical Thinking in Hysterical Times. Published by The Libertarian Institute. 2023. 279 Pages.

“Trust the science!” they said. “Listen to the experts!” During the “Coronapocalypse” we heard the same tired refrains until we wanted to gouge out our eardrums. In reality, the “experts” were incredibly wrong about their own narrow specialties, and even had they been right about the medical side of things, they are not experts on the costs of public policy. The covid cultists called us “grandma killers” and said we “only cared about the economy,” as if grandma couldn’t herself easily stay home and the economy only impacts the rich. There is a proverb of unknown provenance which says “truth is the first casualty of war,” and indeed, once they declared war on a coronavirus, there was a blare of propaganda the match for any dystopian film, whipping the public up into a fury of irrationality. Those of us standing against the wind from the beginning were at the greatest of disadvantages when the only things informing decision making were an unwarranted fear of the “unknown” and a bias for action. By the time more were on our side, our enemies were hopelessly dug in. In Questioning the COVID Company Line: Critical Thinking in Hysterical Times, Laurie Calhoun presents a series of essays spanning from August of 2020 through March of 2023, a period after the initial panic but which covers the rise and fall of the vaccines and ultimately the end of the years-long “state of emergency.”

Share

Calhoun, who has a background in chemistry and philosophy, is different from the “expert” class in that she has a well-rounded intellect and is able to thoroughly consider what is right and wrong, apply logic, and examine the ethics of the costs of government policies. Perhaps more importantly, as a long-time foreign policy writer who has written a book about the drone war, she understands the costs and counterproductive nature of America’s real wars and why they should not be a model for a figurative war on infectious respiratory disease. This collection provides profound and useful insight from two and a half years in the life of a sane and sagacious woman in a mad and foolish world. We should all strive to follow Calhoun’s path of critical thinking and common sense instead of letting fear drive us into trusting the crackpot theories of a specialist class.

To start with the physical book itself, everything is well put together and of impressive quality, especially for having been independently published by a small non-profit. I was offered a free advanced PDF in the knowledge that I would review the text, however, as I have the spirit of an elderly person who fears technology, I insisted on buying a “dead tree” copy. The acknowledgements say the book was put together by Ben Parker, Mike Dworski, and Grant Smith, who did a wonderful job of turning this collection of online essays into a proper text- it does not at all have the feel of something which was simply copied off the internet. The citations have all been converted from the original hyper-links into convenient end notes. There is also a thorough index of place and personal names for easy reference. It is refreshing to see a new book from an independent publisher so well put together, given the gate-keeping from the neurotic “woke” women at mainstream commercial publishers. Books which encourage people to think critically and question the most deranged aspects of our society are more important than ever, and The Libertarian Institute has done a good thing by getting this one into print….

CONTINUE READING THE COMPLETE REVIEW ESSAY

 

What People Are Saying About “The Truth About Oppenheimer”

What People Are Saying About “The Truth About Oppenheimer”

People are REALLY liking my new documentary “The Truth About Oppenheimer.” This is what they’re saying about it:

An absolutely riveting start to a documentary series and I can’t wait for the next part. –@erosmangr74

This was more enlightening than I ever expected. Very well done. Utterly fascinating. I can’t wait for part II. The illustration of the depths to which this government can dive in its quest for domination is beyond belief. Thank you for this education. –@revzef

I’m seeing people on podcasts talking about Oppenheimer I’m right now because of the film coming out but this was my favorite presentation. Great job, Patrick. –mikedunn9310

Came over from Horton’s show. I think I’ll skip the fictional Hollywood biopic nonsense and just watch this and the forthcoming sequels. –Krusty222

Hell is full of capable scientists –klausineliebtpeter

My God –bobotheclown1634

Amazing Job! Very Professional! –sldl

Awesome work mate –Kym Robinson

Fascinating and very well done. Bravo, Patrick! –Laurie Calhoun

You are awesome –Scott Horton

If you’d like to see the Libertarian Institute creating more professionally produced work like “The Truth About Oppenheimer, please support it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Watch “The Truth About Oppenheimer” right now for free:

The Libertarian Lesson From ‘Downfall’

The Libertarian Lesson From ‘Downfall’

Once small government advocates concede that war is a euphemism for theft funded mass murder, taxation is theft, and economic regulation turns productive people into “criminals”, they will frequently say, “We at least need a government to protect us from other governments!”.

Set aside the fact that death by government from wars, starvation blockades, and genocides yield a result no private organization could ever come close to, since no one imagines private groups have an arbitrary right to initiate violence against peaceful people.

This mentality ignores the economic reality that one group having a judicial monopoly on an entire geographical area, means that other governments only have to occupy a country’s capital buildings in order to “take it over”.

The excellent WWII movie, Downfall (2004), focuses on the National Socialist government of Germany losing control of Berlin (the capital of Germany) to the Soviet’s. The reason Berlin of all cities was the downfall of the Third Reich, was because that was the central point of the government’s control over the people of Germany. Once that area is taken over, and the masses of people have been trained to answer to the people who occupy those buildings, the country has effectively been conquered.

Even today, the War in Ukraine is frequently referred to as the “Battle for Kyiv“, knowing the implications of how powerful it is to occupy a country’s capital.

Under governments, nations essentially put all their eggs in one basket so to speak. Under a free market, no group would have a recognized judicial monopoly in the form of a capital, making it far more costly for other gangs or governments to take control of millions of peoples lives through military intervention.

Progressives and Conservatives alike, always warn us about the potential dangers of free market monopoles, while advocating the state monopolize law and order, compulsory schooling, taxation, the money supply, and a host of other vitally important aspects of society.

It’s true that monopolies give us higher prices and poorer quality than we would otherwise have under competition. It’s also true, that this economic concept applies to government monopolies as well.

Far from being a Utopian fantasy, private security is already all around us. Recently I witnessed a company experience a Ransomware attack. Every file that made their company what it is, was in danger. At no point did anyone say, “Let’s call 911 and the FBI and the NSA they can protect our property!” They immediately called a private IT company in Arizona, got a hold of SentinelOne private Cyber Security, used Google Cloud Security to back up protected files, and PayPal private security to keep their financial assets safe.

When push came to shove and they needed their most valuable assets protected, they went to private security and ignored the state completely knowing it would be a waste of time.

At shopping malls, baseball games, banks, bars, hotels, amusement parks, and concerts we see private security voluntarily providing what the state claims only they can give us.

It’s time we stop having double standards. If government employees can’t voluntarily compete for our hard earned money, they should go bankrupt and cease to exist.

I’ll end with a quote by author, Michael Malice:

If the government didn’t have a monopoly on security, only rich people would be able to have security just like when the government got out of other businesses, the only cars produced were limousines, the only clothes produced were tuxedos and the only food produced was foie gras. 

– Michael Malice, July 26th, 2022 (Twitter)

The Gender Death Gap

The Gender Death Gap

A central claim of modern day Social Justice advocates is that the existence of disparities, is proof of discrimination.

By this metric, American police and the American workplace system are systemically, systematically, and fundamentally sexist (and ageist!).

An overwhelming majority of people shot and killed by police are male – over 95 percent. More than half of the victims are between 20 and 40 years old.

– Washington Post, Police Shootings Database

The real problem with police is two-fold. First, they are coercively funded via taxation, meaning they receive money from their involuntary customer base whether or not they are providing a quality service. Second, the system of Officer Supremacy means they have a right to give citizens orders, and the citizens have a legal obligation to obey them.

Bad news for workplace equality as well. According to Forbes,

[T]he huge difference in workplace fatalities between men and women, with 4,761 men dying on the job compared to 386 women in 2017. The fatality rate for men was about 10 times that of women: 5.7 per 100,000 vs. 0.6 per 100,000 for women.

– Chuck DeVore, Fatal Employment: Men 10 Times More Likely Than Women To Be Killed At Work

It turns out, men have roughly 13 times the amount of testosterone that women do, making them more likely to commit acts of direct physical violence such as rape and murder. It also explains why they apply for jobs that entail more risk and result in higher compensation.

Please let us put to bed this evil, divisive myth that the existence of disparities in outcome is proof of unjust discrimination!

Podcasts

scotthortonshow logosq

coi banner sq2@0.5x

liberty weekly thumbnail

Don't Tread on Anyone Logo

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

Pin It on Pinterest