Central Banks of course.
“In lieu of common sense, however, the guilty will use a whole lot of those impressive sounding words to obfuscate instead of argument, while very much counting otherwise on the favorable rulings of the judge (politicians) who lets this charade go on and on because the judge also knows that if the truth ever got out they’d be right there in the defendant’s chair with the central bankers.”
Why do we continue to let central bankers evaluate their own job performance? It's letting putting the most dishonest and heinous criminal in the jury box alone by himself to inappropriately render what truly is a momentous, incredibly crucial verdict.https://t.co/SdX4Urcuwz pic.twitter.com/AMB3NNEfl8
— Jeffrey P. Snider (@JeffSnider_AIP) August 3, 2020