Against the Unconstitutional Suspension of Jury Trials Ep. 133

by | Oct 11, 2020

Against The Unconstitutional Suspension Of Jury Trials

In an unprecedented abridgment of the most basic rights of an ostensibly free society, American citizens are being wholly deprived of their right to Due Process in the name of an amorphous “public health emergency.” This must not stand.

Join the Liberty Weekly Elite Subscribe to Liberty Bigly!

Subscribe to Unhallowed

Episode 133 of the Liberty Weekly Podcast is Brought to you by:

The Liberty Weekly Amazon Affiliate Link

The Liberty Weekly Patreon Page: help support the show and gain access to tons of bonus content! Become a patron today!

Become a Patron!Show Notes:

In In re the Matter of the Extension of Orders and Interim Rule Concerning Continuation of Jury Trials, Suspension of Statutory Deadlines for Non-criminal Jury Trials, and Remote Hearings During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Liberty Weekly: The Real Magna Carta Ep. 58

Liberty Weekly: Lysander Spooner on Jury Nullification Ep. 56

Lysander Spooner “Trial by Jury” Full Text

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Patrick Macfarlane

Patrick Macfarlane

Patrick MacFarlane is the Justin Raimondo Fellow at the Libertarian Institute where he advocates a noninterventionist foreign policy. He is a Wisconsin attorney in private practice. He is the host of the Vital Dissent at www.vitaldissent.com, where he seeks to oppose calamitous escalation in US foreign policy by exposing establishment narratives with well-researched documentary content and insightful guest interviews. His work has appeared on antiwar.com, GlobalResearch.ca, and Zerohedge. He may be reached at patrick.macfarlane@libertyweekly.net

View all posts

Listen to Vital Dissent with Patrick MacFarlane

RSS FeediHeartRadioPodcast Addict

Our Books

Shop books published by the Libertarian Institute.

Our Books

cb0cb1ef 3fcb 417d 80d8 4eef7bbd8290

Recent Articles

Recent

Politician or Party?

Politician or Party?

by | Aug 12, 2025

Political news hosts will rail against an opposing party member, declaring they must be replaced for passing legislation the pundit disagrees with. To which I always wonder: who will replace them? And who will replace the people who elected them and their financial...

read more

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This