The ACB Hearings & The Problem with SCOTUS Ep. 134

by | Oct 12, 2020

Amy Coney Barrett

Keith Knight and I unpack the ACB hearings from this morning. We discuss separation of powers, conservative vs. progressive vs. libertarian judicial philosophy, and objective morality.

Subscribe to Keith Knight’s “Don’t Tread on Anyone” on LBRY.tv

Subscribe to Unhallowed!

Episode 134 of the Liberty Weekly Podcast is Brought to you by:

The Liberty Weekly Amazon Affiliate Link

The Liberty Weekly Patreon Page: help support the show and gain access to tons of bonus content! Become a patron today!

Become a Patron!

Show Notes:

“The Structure of Liberty” by Randy Barnett

“Chaos Theory” by Robert Murphy

Liberty Weekly: The Conspiratorial Corruption of the Constitution Ep. 2

Ted Cruz Opening Remarks to Amy Coney Barrett

Amy Coney Barrett Opening Statement

William J. Watkins, Jr.; Popular Sovereignty, Judicial Supremacy, and the American Revolution: Why the Judiciary Cannot be the Final Arbiter of Constitutions

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Patrick Macfarlane

Patrick Macfarlane

Patrick MacFarlane is the Justin Raimondo Fellow at the Libertarian Institute where he advocates a noninterventionist foreign policy. He is a Wisconsin attorney in private practice. He is the host of the Vital Dissent at www.vitaldissent.com, where he seeks to oppose calamitous escalation in US foreign policy by exposing establishment narratives with well-researched documentary content and insightful guest interviews. His work has appeared on antiwar.com, GlobalResearch.ca, and Zerohedge. He may be reached at patrick.macfarlane@libertyweekly.net

View all posts

Listen to Vital Dissent with Patrick MacFarlane

RSS FeediHeartRadioPodcast Addict

Our Books

Shop books published by the Libertarian Institute.

Our Books

cb0cb1ef 3fcb 417d 80d8 4eef7bbd8290

Recent Articles

Recent

Politician or Party?

Politician or Party?

by | Aug 12, 2025

Political news hosts will rail against an opposing party member, declaring they must be replaced for passing legislation the pundit disagrees with. To which I always wonder: who will replace them? And who will replace the people who elected them and their financial...

read more

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This