The ACB Hearings & The Problem with SCOTUS Ep. 134

by | Oct 12, 2020

Keith Knight and I unpack the ACB hearings from this morning. We discuss separation of powers, conservative vs. progressive vs. libertarian judicial philosophy, and objective morality.

Subscribe to Keith Knight’s “Don’t Tread on Anyone” on LBRY.tv

Subscribe to Unhallowed!

Episode 134 of the Liberty Weekly Podcast is Brought to you by:

The Liberty Weekly Amazon Affiliate Link

The Liberty Weekly Patreon Page: help support the show and gain access to tons of bonus content! Become a patron today!

Become a Patron!

Show Notes:

“The Structure of Liberty” by Randy Barnett

“Chaos Theory” by Robert Murphy

Liberty Weekly: The Conspiratorial Corruption of the Constitution Ep. 2

Ted Cruz Opening Remarks to Amy Coney Barrett

Amy Coney Barrett Opening Statement

William J. Watkins, Jr.; Popular Sovereignty, Judicial Supremacy, and the American Revolution: Why the Judiciary Cannot be the Final Arbiter of Constitutions

Patrick Macfarlane

Patrick Macfarlane

Patrick MacFarlane is the Justin Raimondo Fellow at the Libertarian Institute where he advocates a noninterventionist foreign policy. He is a Wisconsin attorney in private practice. He is the host of the Vital Dissent at www.vitaldissent.com, where he seeks to oppose calamitous escalation in US foreign policy by exposing establishment narratives with well-researched documentary content and insightful guest interviews. His work has appeared on antiwar.com, GlobalResearch.ca, and Zerohedge. He may be reached at patrick.macfarlane@libertyweekly.net

View all posts

Listen to Vital Dissent with Patrick MacFarlane

Our Books

Recent Articles

Recent

The State Is Socializing the Cost Of the Iran War

The State Is Socializing the Cost Of the Iran War

War is often sold to the public as an act of national will: decisive, necessary, and under control. The bill arrives later, in a quieter form. It shows up in insurance markets, shipping rates, emergency guarantees, higher fuel prices, and sudden policy reversals...

read more
Arguing Against the State Without Hesitation

Arguing Against the State Without Hesitation

In 2008, a book appeared called Deleting the State: An Argument About Government. It was a trim volume, barely a hundred pages of actual text, but it hit me with the force of a hundred pounds from the very first page. As an undergraduate political science student, I...

read more
The Tea Party Stumbled So That MAGA Could Fall

The Tea Party Stumbled So That MAGA Could Fall

Political movements often begin as revolts against entrenched power, only to be absorbed by the very institutions they sought to challenge. The pattern is familiar in American political history. Grassroots insurgencies ignite public enthusiasm, mobilize voters around...

read more

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This