American and NATO Leaders Say Ukraine’s Goals Will Lead to a Long War

by | Sep 18, 2023

American and NATO Leaders Say Ukraine’s Goals Will Lead to a Long War

by | Sep 18, 2023

press conference of volodymyr zelenskyy and jens stoltenberg

Viewing on a phone a live broadcast of Volodymyr Zelenskyy's speech against the background of the NATO flag during the 2023 NATO Summit in Vilnius, Lithuania, July 12, 2023

The top-ranking American military official and the civilian head of the North Atlantic alliance believe the war in Ukraine will continue for years if Kiev is to achieve its military goals. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has signed a decree outlawing talks with Russia and plans to restore Ukraine’s pre-2014 borders.

In an interview published Sunday by German outlet Funke Media Group, NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said the alliance must prepare for a long war. “Most wars last longer than expected when they first begin. Therefore, we must prepare ourselves for a long war in Ukraine.” He continued, “We must recognize that if Zelensky and the Ukrainians stop fighting, their country will no longer exist. If President Putin and Russia stop fighting, we will have peace.”

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Gen. Mark Milley spoke with CNN about his outlook on the war. “There’s well over 200,000 Russian troops in Russian-occupied Ukraine. This offensive, although significant, has operational and tactical objectives that are limited, in the sense that they do not—even if they are fully achieved—they don’t completely kick out all the Russians, which is the broader strategic objective that President Zelensky had,” the general said. “That’s going to take a long time to do that. That’s going to be very significant effort over a considerable amount of time.”

“I can tell you that it’ll take a considerable length of time to militarily eject all 200,000 or plus Russian troops out of Russian-occupied Ukraine. That’s a very high bar. It’s going to take a long time to do it,” he added.

The assessments come as Kiev’s war machine has stalled. Last year, Ukraine’s military was able to recapture a significant portion of the Kharkov region. However, Kiev’s summer offensive has failed to meet its objectives, and Ukraine has sustained substantial losses of troops and equipment.

The primary goal of the offensive was to capture Melitopo and sever the Russian territory in southern Ukraine. So far, Ukrainian forces have only advanced a few kilometers in that direction. Milley recently predicted Kiev would only have about a month before weather conditions would cause the offensive to end.

Zelensky’s overall goal is far more ambitious: to retake Crimea, the Donbas, and southern Ukraine. Kiev has said it will not compromise on the issue, and the Ukrainian president issued a decree preventing talks with Russia so long as Vladimir Putin remains president.

It is unclear how long Kiev and its Western backers can continue to fight a war of attrition against Russia. American defense officials have warned that arms transfers to Ukraine have depleted U.S. arms stockpiles.

One concern is a lack of artillery for Kiev. In July, President Joe Biden decided to send cluster bombs to Ukraine because America had reached its minimum stock of 155mm shells. The transfer of cluster bombs likely violates U.S. laws, and the bomblets spread by the munitions are notorious for killing civilians for decades after the war ends.

Currently, U.S. arms manufacturers produce around 28,000 155mm shells each month—well below the number Ukrainian forces typically fire. While the Pentagon’s deputy chief for acquisition, Bill LaPlante, said U.S. weapons firms hope to turn out over 1 million rounds per year by 2025, that would still fall far short of Russia’s current output: an estimated 2 million annually.

The U.S. has pledged over $43 billion in military aid to Ukraine, including over 1.5 million 155mm rounds. Still, Ukrainian officials say Kyiv requires significantly more aid to achieve its war goals. On Sunday, the head of Ukraine’s Security Council, Oleksiy Danilov, published an op-ed outlining how Kiev would win the war.

“I am deeply convinced that there is only one effective solution to this problem: de-occupation of Ukrainian lands by military means. Russia and its ruling clique don’t understand any other language than the language of force and weapons. Therefore, the peace formula is the weapons formula.” He wrote, “The sooner Ukraine receives enough modern weapons, the sooner we will return to peace, which will be safer for Europe and the world. The practice of dosing military assistance to Ukraine due to fear of irritating Putin and provoking Russia to further escalation is fundamentally flawed. Refusing or delaying the transfer of modern weapons to the Ukrainian armed forces is a direct encouragement to the Kremlin to continue the war, not the other way around.”

Zelensky is expected to travel to Washington later this week to lobby Congress to approve a $24 billion aid package for Kiev proposed by the White House. It’s likely the Ukrainian leader will also meet with Biden.

The war also has the potential to spiral into a conflict between nuclear powers. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov says the U.S. is already at war with Russia. On Sunday at the Eastern Economic Forum, the Russian diplomat explained Moscow’s position. “No matter what it says, it [the U.S.] controls this war, it supplies weapons, munition, intelligence information, data from satellites, it is pursuing a war against us,” Lavrov said.

The stalled Ukrainian counteroffensive has led Kyiv to step up strikes inside Russia. Over the weekend, Ukraine launched a series of drone attacks on Crimea and Moscow. The Kremlin slammed Kiev for launching terrorist attacks. Moscow claims its air defenses thwarted the attack.

Kiev’s strikes on Russia are likely to increase as Secretary of State Antony Blinken gave Ukraine a green light last week. When Washington’s top diplomat was asked if he approved of Ukraine using American weapons to hit targets deep inside Russian territory, he responded by stating “In terms of their targeting decisions, it’s their decision, not ours.”

This article was originally featured at Antiwar.com and is republished with permission.

About Kyle Anzalone

Kyle Anzalone is news editor of the Libertarian Institute, opinion editor of Antiwar.com and co-host of Conflicts of Interest with Will Porter and Connor Freeman.

Our Books

latest book lineup.

Related Articles

Related

Last Weekend, Iran Changed Everything

Last Weekend, Iran Changed Everything

On April 13, Iran responded to Israel’s attack on its embassy compound in Damascus that killed seven Iranian officers, including a very senior military official, General Mohammad Reza Zahedi, by launching over 300 drones and missiles at Israel from Iranian soil. U.S....

read more
FISA Exchanges Real Liberty for Phantom Security

FISA Exchanges Real Liberty for Phantom Security

House Speaker Mike Johnson betrayed liberty and the Constitution by making a full-court press to get a “clean” reauthorization of Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance (FISA) Act through the House. Section 702 authorizes warrantless surveillance of...

read more
Embracing Deflation

Embracing Deflation

In recent years, the specter of inflation has loomed large over the global economy, fueled by unprecedented monetary stimulus measures and supply chain disruptions. As prices have surged, concerns about the erosion of purchasing power and the threat of runaway...

read more
One Hundred Years of IRS Political Targeting

One Hundred Years of IRS Political Targeting

One hundred years ago, Senator James Couzens, a Michigan Republican, took to the Senate floor to denounce the Bureau of Internal Revenue for abusing its power and trampling innocent taxpayers. Couzens launched a sweeping Senate investigation of federal tax collectors....

read more