Civil asset forfeiture challenged by Rand Paul

by | Mar 18, 2017

Civil asset forfeiture challenged by Rand Paul

by | Mar 18, 2017

Rand Paul introduces the most sweeping reform of civil asset forfeiture law in decades

Sen. Rand Paul has long taken the lead in calling for the reform of civil asset forfeiture laws, a controversial police practice in which authorities basically steal the property of citizens without due process and little recourse. Billions have been seized from citizens by the police based on nothing more than suspicion, which many see as a direct violation of the Fifth Amendment.

It’s state-sanctioned theft. “Under civil forfeiture laws, your property is guilty until you prove it innocent,” says the Institute for Justice’s Scott Bullock.

On Thursday, Sen. Paul reintroduced FAIR (Fifth Amendment Integrity Restoration) Act, which specifically addresses victims of civil asset forfeiture who have not been convicted of a crime.

“The federal government has made it far too easy for government agencies to take and profit from the property of those who have not been convicted of a crime,” Paul’s statement read. “The FAIR Act will protect Americans’ Fifth Amendment rights from being infringed upon by ensuring that government agencies no longer profit from taking the property of U.S. citizens without due process.”

Read the rest at Rare.

Jack Hunter

Jack Hunter

Jack Hunter is the former political editor of Rare.us. He has written regularly for the Washington Examiner, The Daily Caller, The American Conservative, Spectator USA and has appeared in Politico magazine and The Daily Beast. Hunter is the co-author of the "The Tea Party Goes to Washington" by Senator Rand Paul (R-KY).

View all posts

Our Books

Shop books published by the Libertarian Institute.

Podcasts

scotthortonshow logosq

coi banner sq2@0.5x

liberty weekly thumbnail

Don't Tread on Anyone Logo

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

Our Books

Recent Articles

Recent

The ‘Fake China Threat’ Vindicated

The ‘Fake China Threat’ Vindicated

For several years and in a variety of works at the Libertarian and Mises Institutes, I have argued that Washington’s bipartisan consensus about Beijing as an aggressive, revisionist challenger to U.S. global supremacy was deeply misguided. Far from seeking global...

read more

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This