10 YEAR ANNIVERSARY
Independent. Anti-War. Unbought.

Donald Trump Should Finish the Opening With Cuba

by | Nov 27, 2016

Donald Trump Should Finish the Opening With Cuba

by | Nov 27, 2016

The best way to speed the day when the Cuban people will be free is to immerse Cuba in the world.

The communist king is dead. May the next one not live so long. And then may there be no other. Although the government headed by Fidel Castro’s brother, Raul, continues, Fidel’s death marks the end of an era. It is difficult to imagine a future revolutionary becoming a romantic figure while imprisoning and executing his opponents.

Today the truth about Cuba’s supposedly equal society is widely known: it is one of poverty and only for those without power. One suspects that Fidel never had to produce a ration book for food, like his countrymen.

Still, the system isn’t likely to disappear soon. Raul has been in charge for a decade, as Fidel retreated due to ill health. More than a few regime apparatchiks still believe their interest is advanced by oppressing everyone else.

What should the United States do?

Washington has been at odds with Havana since Castro’s revolutionaries took power in 1959. Cuba would have been of little geopolitical importance except for the Cold War, when the Castros turned to the Soviet Union for support. The United States initiated economic warfare against the regime, soon imposing a full embargo.

Alas, the attempt to economically strangle communist rule was no more successful than the Bay of Pigs invasion by Cuban exiles and series of bizarre CIA plots to assassinate Fidel Castro. After the Cuban missile crisis the Kennedy administration agreed not to again threaten the island with invasion, but maintained economic sanctions.

Washington’s abject failure—Castro outlasted ten presidents—caused politically sensitive lawmakers to continue doubling down, eventually even targeting foreign companies. Yet the Castros continued to rule, despite the end of economic subsidies from the defunct Soviet Union.

Indeed, U.S. behavior fit the definition of insanity: doing more of the same thing and expecting a different result.

Read the rest at The National Interest.

Recent Articles

Recent

The Inescapable Smear of ‘Antisemitism’

The Inescapable Smear of ‘Antisemitism’

Last week, Bill Kristol’s son-in-law Matthew Continetti wrote an op-ed about the midterm elections for The Wall Street Journal titled “Anti-Semitism is on the Ballot.” “Rising antisemitism isn’t only a problem for Democrats. No one who travels in Republican or...

read more
USAID Was Never Only A Leftist Project

USAID Was Never Only A Leftist Project

Over the last year, a common narrative has circulated through conservative commentary about Latin America’s political shifts. Washington dismantled the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), the argument goes, and conservative candidates began...

read more
The UAE’s Audacious Play To Co-Opt the United Nations

The UAE’s Audacious Play To Co-Opt the United Nations

The word “audacity,” defined by the Cambridge English Dictionary as “courage or confidence of a kind that other people find shocking or rude,” is, as its definition suggests, construed mainly in personal terms, and often, as with Barack Obama’s “the audacity of hope,”...

read more

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This