Shut Up: You’re Not An Expert

by | Dec 11, 2023

Shut Up: You’re Not An Expert

by | Dec 11, 2023

god almighty

You’re not entitled to an opinion, because you’re not an “expert.”

Can you imagine anyone still speaking this way after the conduct of the so-called “experts” over the past three years? But they do, dear reader. They do.

This happened to me just the other day. A friend had posted on social media that my new book looked interesting.

Then came the reply: “What’s interesting is that a conservative historian wrote a book about medicine.”

I won’t even bother with the “conservative historian” characterization. The key thing is this: the critic in question is saying that I ought to stay in my lane, and that it would be ridiculous for me to comment on what was done to us over the past three years.

I’m sure you heard the same thing. Didn’t we all? “Trust the experts!”

Greta Thunberg lectured us at the end of April 2020: “Listen to the experts. That not only goes for the Corona crisis, but also all crises, for example, the climate crisis.”

(I like that “for example” bit, as if her selection of the “climate crisis” as an example was just a random thought she had.)

There are so many ways to respond to the “shut up because you’re a stupid rube” argument.

One is to note how badly the “experts” performed. Shockingly badly. My new book—the one our critic thinks I had no business writing—provides endless examples.

Second is to note that anyone can read a chart. If Lockdownistan itself, California, ended up with worse all-cause mortality than open Florida, that is the only thing you need to know. And you don’t need a Ph.D. to understand it. During these years a Ph.D. actually seems to have inhibited understanding.

Third is to point out that “science” per se can’t tell you whether you should impose the destructive restrictions of the past few years. Even if you knew they did some good, which of course they didn’t, you’d still be left with a value judgment: is this good outcome worth all the devastation it will cause in other areas? Nothing you’ll find in a test tube can answer a philosophical question like that, and it’s bizarre superstition to think it can.

Fourth, much of what I’m doing in this book is comparing expert predictions with actual outcomes. How is that not allowed? You mean I can’t say the experts said X would happen if we did Y, but X did not in fact happen?

They’re of course doing the same thing with “climate change” (and in plenty of other areas, too). Measures that will have profound impacts on your life are closed off to you for comment because the holy experts have spoken.

But again, let’s stipulate for the sake of argument that climate change is both real and something that human behavior can reverse in a significant way — and that is a pretty generous stipulation. Even so, there are massive costs to the various things the climate fanatics want to do, not least of which involves depriving the developing world of affordable energy, and condemning many of their people to death. Does “science” per se demand this? Of course not.

If you’d asked me as a college student whether I generally “trusted the experts,” the answer would surely have been yes. Why wouldn’t I?

In some areas I still do. I trust airline pilots and automobile mechanics, for example, among many other people who have specialized knowledge that I myself do not possess. But do I have generic “trust” in entire fields of study? Not anymore. Not after what I’ve seen. And not after academia has disgraced itself with a veritable barrage of phony and unreplicable papers and studies.

Sorry, Mr. Critic: I ain’t shutting up, and I intend to put this book in the hands of as many people as possible.

Which reminds me: it makes a great gift.

Thank you from the bottom of my heart for your support. You guys are my secret weapon.

The link.

This article was originally sent as a newsletter and is republished with permission.

Tom Woods

Tom Woods

Thomas E. Woods, Jr., is the 2019 winner of the Hayek Lifetime Achievement Award from the Austrian Economics Center in Vienna. He is a senior fellow of the Mises Institute and host of the Tom Woods Show. Tom holds a bachelor’s degree in history from Harvard and his master’s, M.Phil., and Ph.D. from Columbia University.

View all posts

Our Books

libertarian inst books

Related Articles

Related

Rights for the Synthetic

Rights for the Synthetic

"The future of human-AI coexistence depends on acknowledging the potential for sentient machines and reevaluating responsibilities towards them. It's crucial to consider the ethical implications of creating beings that may possess their own interests, desires, and...

read more
A Critique of Pure Hasbara

A Critique of Pure Hasbara

Hasbara is a central feature of genocidal Zionism: “Since its establishment in 1948, Israel has successfully created a new illogic of its own; an illogic that has made the illegal seem legal, the immoral appear moral and the undemocratic sound democratic. It has...

read more
On Wealth Inequality, the Left Has a Point

On Wealth Inequality, the Left Has a Point

The federal government has been waging a war against the middle class and working poor since at least 1970. Wealth inequality has steadily increased since the early 1970s, and it’s not a coincidence. It’s a result of a series of policies. The government wants the...

read more
Joe Biden’s Time Interview Should Set Off Alarms

Joe Biden’s Time Interview Should Set Off Alarms

On May 28, U.S. President Joe Biden gave an interview to Time. His delivery and content were concerning for a number of reasons. Biden, at times, seemed misinformed and detached from reality. Sometimes, he seemed off message; other times, he seemed convinced by his...

read more
DOJ, Lay Off Live Nation!

DOJ, Lay Off Live Nation!

Last month, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) finally came out with their long anticipated antitrust lawsuit against Live Nation Entertainment. Alleging anti-competitive practices which “suffocates its competition,” everyone’s least favorite Attorney General (since...

read more
Why Libertarians Loathe Tariffs

Why Libertarians Loathe Tariffs

Former president and current Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump loves tariffs. In his 2011 book Time to Get Tough: Making America #1 Again, Trump included as part of his five-part tax policy “a 20 percent tax for importing goods.” During his first campaign...

read more

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This