The Persistence of Tyranny

by | Feb 18, 2018

The Persistence of Tyranny

by | Feb 18, 2018

US Supreme Court | Pixabay

Seventy-five years ago this June, the United States Supreme Court corrected its own grave moral and legal error and ruled that the government could not compel Jehovah’s Witnesses to salute the flag and take the Pledge of Allegiance at school. Justice Jackson’s stirring words were a watershed moment in American recognition of individual liberty in the face of government demands for uniformity:

If there is any fixed star in our constitutional constellation, it is that no official, high or petty, can prescribe what shall be orthodox in politics, nationalism, religion, or other matters of opinion or force citizens to confess by word or act their faith therein. If there are any circumstances which permit an exception, they do not now occur to us.

A majority of the court thus retreated from its ignominious endorsement of thought control three years earlier:

A society which is dedicated to the preservation of these ultimate values of civilization may in self-protection utilize the educational process for inculcating those almost unconscious feelings which bind men together in a comprehending loyalty, whatever may be their lesser differences and difficulties.

These decisions came not in a vacuum, but in an era of brutal and largely forgotten persecution of Jehovah’s Witnesses in America, which I discussed in the first episode of the “Make No Law” Podcast. You could call this tyranny, but the persecution was not committed by an abstraction. The people who abused those Americans were their neighbors, their fellow citizens, their equals before the law. The men on the Supreme Court who initially endorsed — and arguably encouraged — the abuse were just men, a collection of individuals rather than icons.

Read the rest at the Popehat blog.

Our Books

Shop books published by the Libertarian Institute.

libetarian institute longsleeve shirt

Our Books

cb0cb1ef 3fcb 417d 80d8 4eef7bbd8290

Recent Articles

Recent

TGIF: On “Public Property”

TGIF: On “Public Property”

A dubious theory held by some libertarians has been knocking about. It goes something like this: The claim that government-controlled land is actually unowned—and thus not properly subject to government rulemaking—would lead to consequences that reasonable people...

read more
No, Your ‘Doggo’ Doesn’t Have Rights

No, Your ‘Doggo’ Doesn’t Have Rights

Whoever argues in favor of granting rights to animals, has first accepted that humans have rights and believes that animals must also be recognized as subjects of rights. And only someone who has a notion of what having rights means can meaningfully ask for this. Yet...

read more

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This