Warning: Actual Costs of Government Programs Higher Than Advertised

by | Nov 18, 2019

Warning: Actual Costs of Government Programs Higher Than Advertised

by | Nov 18, 2019

As outrageous as the price tag promised to us for initiatives like Elizabeth Warren’s healthcare plan, Bernie’s ‘Medicare for All’ plan, or AOC’s ‘Green New Deal,’ history tells us the actual cost to taxpayers would be far higher.

In its first year, Medicare cost $3 billion, and as reported by Reason Magazine, “The House Ways and Means Committee estimated that Medicare would cost only about $12 billion by 1990 (a figure that included an allowance for inflation).”

The actual price tag in 1990?

$107 billion, a full nine times the original projection.

Similarly, Medicaid – the jointly funded state-federal program – was sold to taxpayers and voters with what proved to be a wildly unrealistic price tag.

According to this Federalist article, “In 1965, the House Ways and Means Committee estimated that Medicaid … would cost $238 million in its first year. It actually cost more than $1 billion. By 1971, Medicaid spending had reached about $6.5 billion, blowing away all previous estimates.”

Naturally, the exploding costs of programs like Medicare and Medicaid mean that taxpayers are forced to cough up far more money than what they were promised at the time of passage.

As Reason noted, “In 1965, Medicare architects declared that the initial tax rate of 1 percent of income after 1967 would be sufficient to fund the program for 25 years.” This of course proved to be complete fantasy and by 1972 “the first of several increases in both the payroll tax rate and the wage base against which it was levied.”

It took all of five years for the initial promises to be shattered and for the federal leviathan to reach deeper into the pockets of taxpayers.

If voters knew what the actual burden would be for such government schemes, there’s little doubt public support for them would plummet.

Which leads us back to modern proposals from the likes of Warren and Sanders.

Warren, for instance, has been selling her healthcare plan on the basis that it would largely be funded by a “wealth tax” only impacting households with assets valued above $50 million.

Its easy to see the political appeal of such promises, few people oppose taxes that they won’t have to pay. Targeting a small minority of extremely wealthy people to fund a program providing benefits for a significant share of voters is a well-worn strategy.

But given the history of other massive government programs, are we to believe that only the ‘ultra-rich’ will end up paying for Warren’s or Sanders’ healthcare plans?

We saw how quickly Medicare and Medicaid costs exploded, prompting a heftier tax bill on working Americans.

Moreover, we can look to the modern income tax as more evidence. When the 16th Amendment was ratified in 1913, the initial federal income tax was targeted at the “top 1%” of earners at the time, with rates ranging from a paltry 1 percent to 6 percent.

A tax sold as only impacting “the rich” as a means to fund government expansion. Sound familiar?

We’ve seen what’s happened to the federal income tax ever since, so why should we believe that Warren’s “wealth tax” won’t have a similar fate of being not only increased, but expanded dramatically to include the middle class?

And dramatic cost overruns are not just found in grand, national government overhauls of entire industries. Local projects, like light rail lines, also consistently soak taxpayers for far bigger price tags than the one used to win support.

2015 analysis by Cato Institute analyst Randal O’Toole found “Rail transit projects typically cost about 40 to 50 percent more than projected, with some projects costing double the original projections and very few costing less than 20 percent more than the projections.”

For instance, a light rail line built in Charlotte, North Carolina roughly a decade ago exceeded projected costs by about 2-½ times initial estimates, costing local taxpayers an additional $300 million beyond what they were promised.

More recently, a light rail line in Maryland – slated for completion in 2023 – is already facing cost overruns exceeding $250 million.

The bottom line is this: never believe the cost estimates of government projects. Politicians will try to promise you that their massive schemes can be funded by modest taxes on “the rich,” but don’t fall for it.

In reality, massive cost overruns for government programs are the norm, whether they be national healthcare initiatives or local light rail programs.

It typically doesn’t take long before taxes on ‘the rich’ are revealed to be insufficient to fund the growing government leviathan, and you’ll soon find that those taxes on ‘the rich’ have expanded to take a bigger bite out of your paycheck.

Whenever you hear a politician has a plan, hold on to your wallet.

Reprinted from Erase The State.

Our Books


Related Articles


A Response to My Memorial Day Critics

My article against Memorial Day drew a lot of ire and attention. This should not have been surprising; I was making a controversial statement. What did surprise me, however, was that many critics were self-described libertarians or former libertarians. There were many...

read more
TGIF: Immigration and Liberty

TGIF: Immigration and Liberty

Forbidding freedom of movement to aspiring migrants strikes at the liberty not only of those individuals but also of citizens and legal residents of the United States. That's the way it is with immigration. Indeed, that's the way it is with freedom. The government...

read more

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This