Perusing the most recent edition of Foreign Affairs, which was typically dreadful, one piece caught my eye. In “The Taiwan Fixation,” Stephen Wertheim and Jennifer Kavanagh argued that a full-scale U.S. military intervention over Taiwan would be catastrophic, and that Washington should seek to balance building up Taiwan’s defense while insulating its own broader Indo-Pacific strategy from Taipei’s fate. Their critique of full-blown interventionism is, of course, well-founded, and was a welcome sight, but their core assumptions remain unfortunately rooted in the flawed logic of American...
DOGE and the Futility of Reform
When President Donald Trump announced the creation of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, it was heralded as a game-changer. The goal was ambitious: cut $1-2 trillion in federal spending by 2026, eliminating waste, streamlining agencies, and restoring fiscal sanity to Washington. But for those familiar with bureaucratic dynamics, it was clear from the outset that DOGE would fail—not because its leaders lacked the will or intelligence, but because it was attempting to reform a system that, by its very nature, resists reform. The Iron Law of...
Contra Krugman (Redux)
In a recent conversation with the Libertarian Institute’s Keith Knight, we broke down a 2012 article by everyone’s least favorite economist, the former New York Times pundit Paul Krugman. In it, Krugman makes all the familiar and mistaken arguments about why we needn’t worry about high levels of government borrowing. From “the government doesn’t need to actually pay it back” to “we owe it to ourselves,” Krugman couldn’t be more confident in his wrong-headedness. Krugman’s arguments are fundamentally flawed because they mischaracterize the nature of government debt, ignore the distortive...
The Lofty Goals and Harsh Realities of DOGE
When President Donald Trump announced the creation of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), to be led by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, the initiative was met with both enthusiasm and skepticism. The prospect of cutting $1-2 trillion from the federal budget by 2026 was an ambitious goal, and one that resonated with fiscal conservatives seeking to rein in government spending. However, early results indicate that despite bold promises, the entrenched realities of government spending are proving to be formidable obstacles. In the months following the November election, Musk and...
Can the United States ‘Grow’ Its Way Out of Debt?
Just as today, in the years following World War II the United States faced a national debt exceeding 100% of GDP. Yet, by the early 1970s, that figure had fallen to around 30%. Many policymakers and commentators today point back at this period as proof that economic growth and sound fiscal policies can solve America’s current debt crisis. But can we really "grow our way out" of today’s $36.4 trillion national debt the way we did after the war? The numbers suggest otherwise. The drop in debt-to-GDP following World War II was driven by several key factors: Rapid economic growth: The post-war...
How to Reverse the Monetary Breakdown of the West
For more than half a century, the global economy has operated under a monetary system divorced from gold. The 1971 collapse of the Bretton Woods system, where the U.S. dollar’s convertibility to gold was suspended, ushered in the fiat money era, a regime in which paper currencies are backed by nothing but government decree. Economist Murray Rothbard, in What Has Government Done to Our Money?, particularly in the chapter “The Monetary Breakdown of the West,” details how this transition has distorted economic incentives, weakened the real economy, and fueled financial speculation at the...
Revisiting Rothbard’s Argument on Tariffs
As American consumers and businesses face the looming possibility of additional tariffs under a second Trump administration, it is worth revisiting the incisive critique of protectionism put forth by economist Murray Rothbard in his book Power and Market. Rothbard’s analysis exposes protectionism not as a tool for national prosperity but as a mechanism for enriching politically connected interests at the expense of the general population. With policymakers entertaining yet more trade restrictions, his arguments remain as relevant as ever. Protectionism, in its essence, involves the use of...
Dean Acheson’s Taiwan Dilemma
In the aftermath of World War II, U.S. policymakers felt they faced an increasingly dire situation in China. By late 1949, Mao Zedong’s Communist forces had decisively defeated Chiang Kai-shek’s Nationalists (Kuomintang/KMT), pushing them off the mainland to Taiwan. In the mind of Dean Acheson, secretary of state under President Harry Truman, the collapse of the Nationalists raised pressing questions. Could Taiwan be held against a Communist invasion? And was Chiang Kai-shek the right leader for this task? Acheson’s initial plans, however fleeting, to replace Chiang underscore the...