Ron Paul shares his thoughts on the election with David Gornoski. I loved the part around 7min and 33sec where Paul discusses the implications of JD Vance coming around to seeing the Central Bank as the enemy of mankind as it is. Watch here: https://x.com/DavidGornoski/status/1852058831674839188 Timestamps 0:00 Introduction 2:31 This election is unlike the ones before 3:18 Elon's plan to cut government spending 5:48 Staying positive 7:33 JD Vance on Ron Paul's economics 8:11 Would Ron Paul advise Elon? 9:18 Ray Peat, RFK Jr, and government food regulations 13:29 Preparing for the coming...
Is it Genocide? w/ Jeremy R. Hammond & Keith Knight
https://youtu.be/kQw2fQyN33w How many mass murder campaigns (often called “wars”) will governments have to be involved in before Progressives admit that the state is the very threat to society that they claim to be protecting us from? - Keith Knight, Domestic Imperialism: Nine Reasons I Left Progressivism Watch on Odysee Watch on BitChute Watch on X
Is Unsolicited Advice Immoral? w/ Justin Tosi & Keith Knight
https://youtu.be/FOZyecmNSOc [W]ealthy societies did not get rich by extracting their wealth from elsewhere. Rather, they did so by becoming more productive and thus creating more wealth. - Why It's OK to Mind Your Own Business Justin Tosi is an Associate Professor of Strategy, Economics, Ethics, and Public Policy at the McDonough School of Business at Georgetown University. Watch on X Watch on BitChute Watch on Facebook Watch on Odysee
Dumbest Venn Diagram of All Time?
I believe that every argument should begin with commonly understood definitions. Capitalism is a social system based on the explicit recognition of private property and voluntary contracts. Communism is the abolition of private property altogether. And socialism is institutionalized aggression against private property and contracts between consenting adults. Every short-coming of capitalism applies many times over to socialism since the latter does not legally recognize people's right to voluntarily defund or disassociate with unproductive actors in society. Under capitalism, no one can take...
A History of Communist Ideas From Karl Marx to COVID Lockdowns
https://youtu.be/5uWiRyxewxo What was singular in Cambodia was the all-encompassing “year zero” ambition of the Khmer Rouge. Here Communism was reduced to its essentials, as a negation of everything existing, a war of the young on the old, a social leveling of society down to equality in abject poverty and misery. Pin Yathay, a Cambodian engineer whose family was wiped out by the Khmer Rouge before he escaped and staggered on foot across the mountains to Thailand, later recalled of life in “Democratic Kampuchea,” “There were no schools, no money, no communications, no books, no courts.…...
Konstantin Kisin is Verifiably Wrong About Foreign Policy
https://youtu.be/IKySeu-BHCI Then the fighters realized that the gang in the White House could not see things clearly, and that their leader (that idiot they obey) was claiming that we envied their lifestyle — when the truth, which this Pharaoh would like to hide — is that we are attacking them because of their injustice toward the Muslim world, and especially Palestine and Iraq, as well as their occupation of the land of the two sanctuaries. When the fighters saw this, they decided to come out of the shadows and take the fight into their territory, into their homes. – Al Qaeda in Its Own...
Progressive Myths w/ Dr. Michael Huemer & Keith Knight
https://youtu.be/yhL7B3Aqw9I [H]omicides committed by blacks against whites are more than twice as common as homicides by whites against blacks in the U.S., despite that there are 5.6 times more white people than black people in the U.S. A randomly chosen black person is thus 13 times more likely to kill a white person than a random white person is to kill a black person. (p. 32) Males make up only 50% of the population but 95.5% of the police shooting victims. (p. 63) The gender pay gap statistics do not control for occupation or other relevant factors. In other words, they are not, in...
On “Election Integrity”
The government openly claims the right to control everyday decisions millions of people make with taxes and regulations. Why would they have some exception for who gets to run for (or be elected) President of the United States? The same deep state Domestic Imperialist mindset that regulates all commercial interactions "for your own good" obviously does not just sit idly by and let people decide who the official USA mascot is.