Those who believe Washington D.C. has the right to control Texas, Florida, Arizona, Nebraska, and Kansas are true imperialists. All the regulatory agencies that Democrats support literally are imperialist, i.e. one group arbitrarily imposing its will on another through coercion. Excerpt from Jacobin Magazine Lies About Ludwig von Mises!

How America Was Lied Into Both World Wars
https://youtu.be/ukKSob-6aAM The human tragedy reaches its climax in the fact that after all the exertions and sacrifices of hundreds of millions of people and the victories of the Righteous Cause we have still not found Peace or Security, and that we lie in the grip of even worse perils than those we have surmounted. Winston Churchill, The Gathering Storm (March 1948) p. xiv Hunter DeRensis is editor of the Libertarian Institute, communications director of the veterans advocacy organization Bring Our Troops Home, and formerly senior reporter at The National Interest. His work has been...

Stephen Miller Caught Lying About Libertarianism!
"The Libertarian party is for hard drugs, unlimited immigration, prostitution, radical secularism, no jail for predators, anarchy on the streets. (IOW, identical to the Democrat Party). So if you like those things vote Libertarian or vote Democrat—because they are one in the same." - Stephen Miller Hard drugs? Republicans assisted Big Pharma, the most deadly pushers on planet earth after Trump appointed Fauci, printed trillions, and implemented Operation Warp Speed before telling his followers to get vaccinated. We only oppose caging people for using drugs, which does not mean we are "for"...

The One Question AOC Supporters Can’t Answer…
https://youtu.be/IHenu8z3H9A The socialist society would have to forbid capitalist acts between consenting adults. – Robert Nozick, Ph.D., Anarchy, State, and Utopia (1974 [2013] Basic Books), p. 163. Watch full debate here: Democratic Socialism v. Free Market Economics - Dr. Phil Armstrong vs. Keith Knight BitChute Minds Flote Archive
AOC Exposes Herself as a Total Fraud
So often Democratic Socialists will claim that private companies are bad because they care not about others but only for their own personal benefit. Want money voluntarily? That's greed! Taking money via taxation with the threat of jailing peaceful people, that's public service! If AOC really saw herself as a representative, she would be in tears knowing her constituents are upset with her policies. Instead, she literally smiles and dances. The free market represents peoples values more than the political sphere ever will since it faces competition and lets people opt out of...
Refuting the “Experts”: The 1619 Project and Covid Narrative (feat. Phillip W. Magness, Ph.D.)
https://youtu.be/sDgfh4qilo4 Whereas Marx rejected chattel slavery and extrapolated a long historical march to an eventual socialist reordering through revolutionary upheaval, Fitzhugh saw a readily available alternative. “Slavery is a form, and the very best form, of socialism,” he explained. Wage labor, he predicted, would be forever insufficient to meet the needs of the laborer due to deprivation of his products from his skill. Slavery, to Fitzhugh’s convenience, could step in and fill the gap through the paternalistic provision of necessities for the enslaved, allegedly removing the...
Replacing the Logic of “Workplace Democracy” With the Iron Law of Oligarchy
https://youtu.be/py1C_4ZX174 The iron law of oligarchy is a political theory first developed by the German-born Italian sociologist Robert Michels in his 1911 book, Political Parties. It asserts that rule by an elite, or oligarchy, is inevitable as an "iron law" within any democratic organization as part of the "tactical and technical necessities" of the organization. Michels's theory states that all complex organizations, regardless of how democratic they are when started, eventually develop into oligarchies. Michels observed that since no sufficiently large and complex organization can...
USA vs. China: World War III Over Taiwan?
https://youtu.be/K5FagNGtif8 “My case for pacifism, to recap, comes down to three simple premises. The first two are empirical: Premise #1: The short-run costs of war are clearly awful. [Empirical claim about immediate effects of war]. Premise #2: The long-run benefits of war are highly uncertain. [Empirical claim about people’s ability to accurately forecast the long-run effects of war]. These empirical claims imply pacifism when combined with a bland moral premise: Premise #3: For a war to be morally justified, the expected long-run benefits have to substantially exceed its short-run...