Imagine two criminals: Criminal 1: Forcibly stopped a woman from having a 1 in 10 million vote to determine the governor of New York Criminal 2: Forcibly stopped a woman from getting the job of her dreams via occupational licensing regulations even though a willing employer wanted to hire her You are the judge in both trials, which criminal should get a longer sentence? Criminal 1's actions may be offensive, but have no effect on the outcome of the woman's life since a one in 10 million vote will make no difference. Even if by some miracle she happened to be the deciding vote,...
















