CIA Claims Russia Ran Op to Help Trump Win

by | Dec 9, 2016

Still no evidence provided.

Buried lead: “CIA Says” in place of “National Intelligence Council says” is for a reason: The other agencies wouldn’t sign on. But that’s just evil KGB plausible deniability and those other spy agencies are falling for it! assures the Post.

“The CIA presentation to senators about Russia’s intentions fell short of a formal U.S. assessment produced by all 17 intelligence agencies. A senior U.S. official said there were minor disagreements among intelligence officials about the agency’s assessment, in part because some questions remain unanswered.

“For example, intelligence agencies do not have specific intelligence showing officials in the Kremlin “directing” the identified individuals to pass the Democratic emails to WikiLeaks, a second senior U.S. official said. Those actors, according to the official, were “one step” removed from the Russian government, rather than government employees. Moscow has in the past used middlemen to participate in sensitive intelligence operations so it has plausible deniability.”

Seems like if the Russians wanted to influence the election secretly they could. Seems like if they were this ham-handed about it maybe it was because they were pushing for the opposite reaction, a rally to Hillary, who is a much more predictable, if on the face of it more hawkish, person and candidate.

And then check this out, from elsewhere in the Post, Greg Sargent on the real motives behind these newly declared investigations:

“James Lewis, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a nonpartisan international security think tank, suggests that a finding of Russian interference of some kind might “hem in the next administration,” i.e., the Trump administration. That’s because any evidence that Russia tried to swing the election in some form or other — if such evidence is found — might shine a harsher light on Trump’s foreign policy choices.”

Hint for the new guys: “Hem Trump in” in this context means “prevent Trump from making peace” with Russia.

On the other hand, If Putin Did Rig the U.S. Election, Good.

Update: Marcy Wheeler ain’t buying it. Check out her Twitter feed here. Says she’s going to write up a blog about it soon.

Update II: Greenwald takes these idiots to the woodshed here.

About Scott Horton

Scott Horton is director of the Libertarian Institute, editorial director of, host of Antiwar Radio on Pacifica, 90.7 FM KPFK in Los Angeles, California and podcasts the Scott Horton Show from He's the author of the 2021 book Enough Already: Time to End the War on Terrorism, the 2017 book, Fool's Errand:Time to End the War in Afghanistan, editor of the 2019 book The Great Ron Paul: The Scott Horton Show Interviews 2004–2019 and the 2022 book Hotter Than The Sun: Time to Abolish Nuclear Weapons. He’s conducted more than 5,800 interviews since 2003. Scott lives in Austin, Texas with his wife, Larisa Alexandrovna Horton.

Listen to The Scott Horton Show

Listen to The Scott Horton Show

Our Books


Related Articles


A Response to My Memorial Day Critics

My article against Memorial Day drew a lot of ire and attention. This should not have been surprising; I was making a controversial statement. What did surprise me, however, was that many critics were self-described libertarians or former libertarians. There were many...

read more
Ignoring Political Gossip & Sticking to Principle

Ignoring Political Gossip & Sticking to Principle In the private sector, firms must attract voluntary customers or they fail; and if they fail, investors lose their money, and managers and employees lose their jobs. The possibility of failure, therefore, is a powerful incentive to find...

read more

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This