Blog

The 40% Domestic Violence Number Is Alarming, But They’ll Kill 100% Of You

As Stateless Productions enters the production phase of our new documentary, “America’s Police Crisis,” I can’t get the subject of police brutality out of my head. When people hear the term “police brutality,” depending on their background, they may start to question whether the issue is overblown. They tend to argue police are under extreme stress, have to make split second decisions and deal with the worst in society. However, was the suffocation of Eric Garner an accident? Was the execution of Daniel Shaver a mistake? Was the murder of Atatiana Jefferson through the window of her home just bad judgment? Was the killing of Botham Jean in his kitchen an oopsy?

Many like myself who study State monopoly policing will most likely discover an article from 2014 in which Conor Friedersdorf revealed that 40% of police households experience domestic violence, compared to 10% of the population. There is even further cause for alarm as personal interviews of police officers found even greater instances of officers admitting to injuring family members. What this shows is that domestic violence is 4X as likely to happen in the home of a law enforcement officer than in a normal domestic setting. That should make you question what the character of people who choose that profession is. It could also make one ponder what the career of law enforcement is doing to the minds of officers that causes domestic violence to be so prevalent.

The bigger, more important question may be, is the number actually higher? When abuse is experienced by the child or spouse of a police officer, to whom do they report it? The abusive spouse’s partner? His boss? And keep in mind, any incident included in the 40% study figure made it past the “thin blue line.” How much higher would that number actually be if the cases covered up or hushed were counted?

Leaving the 40% number behind you can be sure of one thing, after the information I provided in this piece, it is clear that you or I can be executed by law enforcement in its current incarnation while the courts, as well as at least half the country, will consider the murderers heroes who were “just doing their jobs.” We live in an age of madness where cops, in the heat of the moment, can “fear for their lives” and end yours for not obeying their orders, all because you may have a hearing problem, suffer autism, or just hesitate out of fear when having commands screamed at you at gunpoint. When you combine this knowledge with the events of the last twelve months, it is easy to believe we are living in a dystopian nightmare.

What I Told the Montana State Senate

What I Told the Montana State Senate

exmdjb7vgakg2hmAmericans For Prosperity and Concerned Veterans of America had me out to give a talk to a committee of the Montana State Senate in Helena on Tuesday.

Here is some of the audio. The first 15 minutes or so about how the corruption of the military industrial complex and the boom and bust caused by the pro-empire easy money policy is pushing American liberals toward socialism are unfortunately not included.

The Right Gets It Wrong – Every Time

Go on, complain about rising gas prices. Whine about inflation. Jump up and down about transgender BS. Even if you believe Biden is calling the shots, so many people miss the point when it comes to the important issues.

If you’re a normie, at this moment in time, you believe Biden is in charge. Most of those who are making jokes about him falling “up” steps or dumping in his pants, generally believe he’s calling the shots. How do I know this? Because he’s the one you’re complaining about. None of your complaints are pointed at the corporate academic or journalist class who come up with the policies. No, you point at Biden. But you are always so far off target with your criticism.

Wouldn’t a better plan of attack on Biden involve foreign policy? If Trump was too much of a hot head to command the “nuclear football,” why wouldn’t you be complaining about an incontinent, proven warmonger having control over it? And what about the wars that are ongoing? Is he mentally competent to handle them? Or are you defaulting to trusting the experts at the Pentagon? You know, the un-elected bureaucrats who run things for every president? The ones you like to call the “Deep State.”

So, we have another president, likely illegitimate even by statists standards, and the most important issue concerning government is all but ignored. This is like being in Game 7 of the World Series and keeping a 25-game winning pitcher who’s had 4 days rest on the bench to instead go with the number 4 in your rotation. It makes no sense. Ignoring the one issue, war, that is crucial to the life and death of the entire planet proves how well the aforementioned members of the corporate press and academia have succeeded in “educating” you. The ones you hate the most have you dancing like puppets on a string.

We May Be The Only Ones Left And That’s Frightening

I admit that I have a love/hate relationship with the concept of logical consistency. Hear me out please. First, my enemies don’t care if their arguments or policies possess logical consistency and, unfortunately, they tend to be the ones that control the reins of power that keep me in bondage to the State and their apparatchiks. Second, if I stay wed to the idea that I must adhere to logical consistency to be a legitimate voice for people who desire the same freedom from oppression that I do, it’s almost certain that I will only be doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different result (insanity). It appears that the few of us who do value logical consistency may be the only ones left. And that’s something that should be discussed more often.

In the past, the American Christian-Right (CR) did a decent job of being consistent in their principles when it came to endorsing candidates, even if it was superficial. At least George W Bush and Ronald Reagan portrayed themselves as Christians, but when the American Evangelicals chose to go to the mat for a twice divorced, foul-mouthed billionaire who bragged about banging porn stars, they lost any high ground they claimed to have. Any Christian who threw their lot behind someone who is closer to Ron Jeremy than Billy Graham deserves every bit of scorn and derision thrown in their direction.

One of the things the CR loves to do is highlight what they often call “liberal hypocrisy.” As an example, the Left championed the George Floyd riots which were responsible for 19 deaths, maybe more, but when it came to the incident at The Capitol on January 6th of this year, they were outraged and even lied about how a Capitol Hill police officer died. The CR, and the Right in general, claim this to be hypocrisy. The problem I struggle with is how the CR can care about logical consistency when the person they’ve literally referred to as their “Savior,” Donald Trump, has as much in common with their soteriological New Testament Savior, Jesus Christ, as Kim Jong-un does. If logical consistency is going to be a watermark you use to judge your enemy, it would make sense that you would do everything within your power to make sure your strategy doesn’t submerge you as well.

For those promoting Libertarian/Anarchist/Agorist (LAA) ideology who are considering using logical consistency, much can be learned by looking at the CR over the last 5-6 years. On one hand, the CR abandoned logical consistency and clearly lost the battle they waged. On the other hand, the question must be asked as to whether they even stood a chance when you take into consideration that even with the Right controlling the White House, Congress and the Supreme Court, the Left still possessed all of the power. Is abandoning logical consistency a way for the LAA to attempt to gain some power over the Left? That’s a question for the individual to consider, but I believe the answer is clear.

Podcasts

scotthortonshow logosq

coi banner sq2@0.5x

liberty weekly thumbnail

Don't Tread on Anyone Logo

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

Pin It on Pinterest