Blog

Protecting Vested Interests

“There were and there will always be people whose selfish ambitions demand protection for vested interests and who hope to derive advantage from measures restricting competition. Entrepreneurs grown old and tired and the decadent heirs of people who succeeded in the past dislike the agile parvenus who challenge their wealth and their eminent social position. Whether or not their desire to make economic conditions rigid and to hinder improvements can be realized, depends on the climate of public opinion. The ideological structure of the nineteenth century, as fashioned by the prestige of the teachings of the liberal economists, rendered such wishes vain. When the technological improvements of the age of liberalism revolutionized the traditional methods of production, transportation, and marketing, those whose vested interests were hurt did not ask for protection because it would have been a hopeless venture. But today it is deemed a legitimate task of government to prevent an efficient man from competing with the less efficient. Public opinion sympathizes with the demands of powerful pressure groups to stop progress. The butter producers are with considerable success fighting against margarine and the musicians against recorded music. The labor unions are deadly foes of every new machine. It is not amazing that in such an environment less efficient businessmen aim at protection against more efficient competitors.”

—Ludwig von Mises, Human Action

From Savagery to Civilization

“The market economy is a man-made mode of acting under the division of labor. But this does not imply that it is something accidental or artificial and could be replaced by another mode. The market economy is the product of a long evolutionary process. It is the outcome of man’s endeavors to adjust his action in the best possible way to the given conditions of his environment that he cannot alter. It is the strategy, as it were, by the application of which man has triumphantly progressed from savagery to civilization.”

—Ludwig von Mises, Human Action

Peace on Earth

Peace on Earth

Peace on Earth is the mantra that we hear, especially now but on and off over the coming year. Those who use violence, will smile it out. Those who profit from war may cheer those words from corporate offices. Those who hate will do so for entire collectives of people, children included. Politicians will lie words of peace with the deceit they are loved for. Christians will die in the land where a Jew was born and died to become their saviour, while that very land is buried beneath rubble and bodies. The three religions of an Abrahamic God will fight, kill and wage war as ideologies but for centuries most lived together in peace and harmony as friends, neighbours and human beings.

In the frontiers, beyond the Christmas grip are those who look on with non-Occidental eyes, ever confused by the examples set despite the words, “peace”. In a New York subway voyeurs watch on as a woman burns to death, the police indifferent as her body locks upright in place, tendons seized, body fat burning like a candle wax. The murderer taking her life in a horrid way. As a man he is putrid. In Palestine thousands are burned alive, their bodies mutilated and ripped by fire and shrapnel. Their murderers as a collective, we are told are righteous. Peace on Earth, so say the enablers, and supporters.

I love you, I will protect,” lies the familiar as his bludgeoned partner weeps in the corner, her face red from his blows. On the rise, is such violence. Women killed by the hands of those they know. In fits of rage and jealousy or with entitled violence so perverse it often goes on in plain sight. It will happen all the more over this period as currency debasement, inflation and shitflation converge to pile on the pressures of debt and the obligation to spend in this consumer season. Many will flee from those related to them or who promised love with such lying words. The Christmas spirit away.

Men to boys are kidnapped and forced to fight a war of vintage nationalism for reasons that the media helped invent of lies, myths that are stained in blood and politics so devious that it required many nations to concoct. The outcome war. Russian and Ukrainian and those adventures paid or ideological fighting in broken and open ground for masters far away. While the world watches with a narrative, such a war seems conventional and is understood as invader versus defender. The conscripted men of Ukraine must fight so cheer the voyeurs through the screens, the Russians are evil, we have been told this. They invaded. If invasion equates evil, what about other nations invading other countries. Never mind, that is the exceptionalism of the mob that watches on, forgotten history and inconsistent narratives.

Peace on Earth”.

Do you mean it? Honestly, is it what you really want?

It means you must sacrifice. That which you take as sacred may be required to end. Peace is not coercion. It is not the possession of others. You don’t own another person, whether a romantic partner or millions of strangers who happen to share your citizenship. We understand that love is a beautiful thing, it’s above all consensual and should be harmonious. Given with respect, admiration and above all should be voluntary. The consent is in the mutual reciprocity of such. Then why is it when it comes to all other social relationships they are based on coercion, bribery, threat. The entitled belief that a monopoly is required to do, to apply, to secure and aid. The more of it we have, the less of ourselves we know. The less peace, more war.

War is not just fought abroad in lands stained by conflict. It’s not just for those in Yemen, Iraq, Palestine, Afghanistan or Vietnam and Korea to look back deeper into time. It’s closer to home. When an individual killed a CEO, it revealed a contrast of justice and criminality for the spectators to debate. Many of those who cheer for the dead CEO, wanted the system that empowered such corporate fascism. It’s not from a voluntary free market but from the State empowering corporations and agencies while constricting access to health, care through the funnels of regulation via the use of coercion, threats and bribery. A family member of such a victim acted with passion and embraced the ideals of John Wick, and now is a criminal, or hero? Though entire nations were ruined and destroyed for less injustice, but when the collective weight of a population is engaged through the mechanisms of the State it is somehow righteous. Instead of one CEO killed, millions, including children are accepted to suffer and die. That is the magic of belief that such a system inspires.

But, peace on Earth right?

It’s a mindset, a philosophy. Unfortunately the underlying truth is that most are sociopath of a sort or don’t care enough to care. What they do care is about self, money and the comforts that a status quo provides them. To challenge that is scary. It’s an unknown. A feral frontier that defies conventions of education and familiarity. Yet, we see it every day. The most pleasant moments and acts of efficiency comes about when there is voluntary interactions, cooperation. We all are sleep walking closer to the realities of North Korea and the most putrid moments of the Soviet Union, not for the death camps and sanctioned murderslavery. Rather the ideology of the State above all else, scarcity, bureaucracy, censorship, surveillance and apathetic dependency. For such egalitarian Utopia’s always ensure elites and rulers profit and reside above the rest.

The unfortunate woman died in that subway not because of anarchic forces, the State was ever present. We live in a world where people learn from their masters, the social standards and that is always that might is right, violence and coercion above all else. Despite the platitudes of language, we simply can’t hear you over what you are doing. We see no examples set, only force, mandates, coercion, options and choices removed. Only debt and dependence remain. Loved ones are denied care, because it is a complicated system, no choice or options on layers of paperwork and processes and waiting times and paperwork all so those in Government and Corporate profit and have jobs. A woman is burned to death, and people watch on, speculating online, and from metres away they record it, police officers walk past. We have become accustomed to spectating violence and death with inhuman regard. It’s all very normal. The crowd loves a spectacle, bread and circuses as such. Except it’s not Caesar or the Senate, but each of us who are doing it. Who want it?

Be with your friends, family. Embrace them. For those with malice and violence, stop inflicting it on your loved ones. Be a better man rather than another who bashes their lady. Stop being a mercenary with indifference to morality, killing whoever the policy makers want you to. Peace on Earth begins and ends with you, me, all of us. We are each complicit and responsible in what we do or don’t do and who-what we serve and deny such service to. How we interact and act, whether we see others as individuals to interact with dignity and respect or view them as objects to satisfy entitlement, as taxation and labour chattel to live at their expense. A child is a child, whether born in Tel Aviv or Gaza, Washington or Moscow. The future? The children learn from you. Peace on Earth to you, to them.

Human Rights Watch: Yes, Israel Is Committing Genocide in Gaza

Human Rights Watch: Yes, Israel Is Committing Genocide in Gaza

The international human rights organization Human Rights Watch (HRW) on December 19 issued a 186-page report concluding that Israel has been perpetrating crimes against humanity in Gaza, including the crimes of extermination and genocide.

HRW’s report follows a 294-page report from Amnesty International documenting Israel’s violations of the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Genocide Convention).

The same day HRW issued its report, the international humanitarian medical organization Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF), or Doctors Without Borders, issued a 34-page report titled “Gaza: Life in a Death Trap”, documenting what the group calls “Israel’s campaign of total destruction”.

The medical group’s report states that

MSF’s firsthand observations align with those of an increasing number of legal experts and organisations, concluding that ethnic cleansing and genocide are taking place in Gaza. MSF calls on States, particularly Israel’s closest allies, to end their unconditional support for Israel and fulfill their obligation to prevent genocide in Gaza.

By far the greatest facilitator of Israel’s genocide is the United States government. The Genocide Convention also prohibits acts of complicity in genocide, so US officials could also theoretically be prosecuted for the crime of genocide by the International Criminal Court (ICC), which on November 21 issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant for war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Whereas Amnesty International’s report took a broad approach to examining the question of whether Israel is violating the Genocide Convention, HRW focused largely on Israel’s policy of deliberately depriving the civilian population of water.

This includes “extensive damage and destruction to water and sanitation infrastructure, including the apparently deliberate, systematic razing of the solar panels powering four of Gaza’s six wastewater treatment plants by Israeli ground forces, as well as Israeli soldiers filming themselves demolishing a key water reservoir.”

Indeed, Israeli soldiers have been gleefully documenting their own war crimes, such as sharing videos to social media of themselves celebrating their wanton destruction of Gaza’s civilian infrastructure.

The horrific sanitary conditions in Gaza have risked an outbreak of polio, a virus transmitted primarily via the fecal-oral route. In August, the World Health Organization (WHO) announced the first case of polio in Gaza in a quarter century, a 10-month-old child who became paralyzed in one leg due vaccine-derived poliovirus, which is caused by infection with the strain of the virus used in the “live” oral polio vaccine, which is attenuated but can revert to virulence and in rare cases causes the disease the vaccine is designed to prevent. This phenomenon has hindered the WHO’s goal of achieving global eradication. Since 2017, more cases of paralytic polio have been caused by the vaccine strain than the wild virus.

The HRW report also noted that the question of intent is decided by statements from Israeli officials openly declaring their aim of depriving the entire civilian population of Gaza of goods and services necessary for their survival. It cites, for example, the statement from then Defense Minister Yoav Gallant on October 9, 2023, ordering “a complete siege” of Gaza so that Palestinians would have “no electricity, no food, no water, no fuel, everything is closed.”

“Since then,” the report observes, “Israeli authorities and military forces have matched these statements with actions.”

The rights group also notes that, in a case charging Israel with genocide brought by the government of South Africa, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on January 26, 2024, issued provisional measures requiring Israel to take steps to comply with its obligations under the Genocide Convention, including facilitating the entrance and distribution of desperately needed humanitarian aid.

While the ICC was established under the Rome Statue, the ICJ was established under the UN Charter, and as a UN member state, Israel is legally obligated to comply with the ICJ’s orders, which the court issued on the grounds that South Africa had presented a “plausible” case that Israel was committing genocide.

HRW notes that the ICJ subsequently issued two further provisional measures, including on May 24 ordering Israel to halt its military assault on Rafah in southern Gaza, where 1.5 million displaced Palestinian civilians were sheltering because they had been ordered by the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) to flee there.

“Since that time,” HRW’s report notes, “Israel has violated the ICJ’s measures, including preventing ‘the deprivation of access to adequate food and water.’”

As the report concludes,

Israeli authorities have over the past year intentionally inflicted on the Palestinian population in Gaza ‘conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.’ This policy, inflicted as part of a mass killing of Palestinian civilians in Gaza means Israeli authorities have committed the crime against humanity of extermination, which is ongoing. This policy also amounts to an ‘act of genocide’ under the Genocide Convention of 1948.

The rights group also calls for an arms embargo against Israel, reminding the US and other suppliers of arms to Israel of their own obligations under international humanitarian law and human rights law, including the Genocide Convention.

Cross-posted from JeremyRHammond.com.

What Corporatism Actually Is

“The fundamental idea both of guild socialism and of corporativism is that every branch of business forms a monopolistic body, the guild or corporazione. This entity enjoys full autonomy; it is free to settle all its internal affairs without interference of external factors and of people who are not themselves members of the guild. The mutual relations between the various guilds are settled by direct bargaining from guild to guild or by the decisions of a general assembly of the delegates of all guilds. In the regular course of affairs the government does not interfere at all. Only in exceptional cases, when an agreement between the various guilds cannot be attained, is the state called in.

“[The guild socialists … aimed at self-government of each branch of industry; they wanted, as the Webbs put it, “the right of self-determination for each vocation.”  …[T]he guild alone should have jurisdiction over its internal affairs and the government should restrict its interference to those things which the guilds themselves cannot settle.

“However, within a system of social cooperation under the division of labor [i.e., the market economy] there are no such things as matters of concern only to those engaged in a special plant, enterprise, or branch of industry and of no concern to outsiders. There are no internal affairs of any guild or corporazione the arrangement of which does not affect the whole nation. A branch of business does not serve only those who are occupied in it; it serves everybody. If within any branch of business there is inefficiency, a squandering of scarce factors of production, or a reluctance to adopt the most appropriate methods of production, everybody’s material interests are hurt…. In the market economy the entrepreneur in making … decisions is unconditionally subject to the law of the market. He is responsible to the consumers. If he were to defy the orders of the consumers, he would suffer losses and would very soon forfeit his entrepreneurial position. But the monopolistic guild does not need to fear competition. It enjoys the inalienable right of exclusively covering its field of production. It is, if left alone and autonomous, not the servant of the consumers, but their master. It is free to resort to practices which favor its members at the expense of the rest of the people.”

—Ludwig von Mises, Human Action

The Pause That Refreshes

jwxmas

I will be spending the holidays with my children and grandchildren at an undisclosed bunker location in the inland Rocky Mountain west and off the ‘net until the new year when I will resume blogging at the Institute…

Since I paused Chasing Ghosts and started WarNotes, I have been firing episodes on a weekly cadence debuting every Monday to complete the Fixing Fight Club series assessing how the US and the West can take a knee and change its martial course from the present azimuth to oblivion.

You will not see an episode debut on MON 30 December 2024 but the next WarNotes (Episode 007) will be published MON 6 January 2025.

Chasing Ghosts: An Irregular Warfare Podcast will resume operations in February 2025.

Make sure you get to the range because you will never exceed your highest level of training.

Merry Christmas and Happy Winter Solstice.

My Substack

Email me at cgpodcast@pm.me

Good Plan Means My Plan

“All this passionate praise of the supereminence of government action is but a poor disguise for the individual interventionist’s self-deification. The great god State is a great god only because it is expected to do exclusively what the individual advocate of interventionism wants to see achieved. Only that plan is genuine which the individual planner fully approves. All other plans are simply counterfeit. In saying ‘plan’ what the author of a book on the benefits of planning has in mind is, of course, his own plan alone. He does not take into account the possibility that the plan which the government puts into practice may differ from his own plan. The various planners agree only with regard to their rejection of laissez faire, i.e., the individuals’ discretion to choose and to act. They entirely disagree with regard to the choice of the unique plan to be adopted. To every exposure of the manifest and incontestable defects of interventionist policies the champions of interventionism react in the same way. These faults, they say, were the results of spurious interventionism; what we are advocating is good interventionism, not bad interventionism. And, of course, good interventionism is the professor’s own brand.

“Laissez faire means: Let the common man choose and act; do not force him to yield to a dictator.”

—Ludwig von Mises, Human Action

Who Needs What?

“[I]t is evident … that the man, who first made himself clothes and built himself a cabin, supplied himself with things which he did not much want, since he had lived without them till then; and why should he not have been able to support in his riper years, the same kind of life, which he had supported from his infancy?”

—Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Discourse on Equality

“Under laissez faire, says the planner, it is not those goods which people ‘really’ need that are produced, but those goods from the sale of which the highest returns are expected. It is the objective of planning to direct production toward the satisfaction of the ‘true’ needs. But who is to decide what the ‘true’ needs are?”

—Ludwig von Mises, Human Action

Podcasts

scotthortonshow logosq

coi banner sq2@0.5x

liberty weekly thumbnail

Don't Tread on Anyone Logo

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

Pin It on Pinterest