Blog

“The Bisexuals of Politics”

“The Bisexuals of Politics”

In a recent debate on the Joe Rogan Experience, between Douglas Murray and Dave Smith, Murray accused libertarians as being the “bisexuals of politics.”

An interesting claim, one that assumes politics is in itself is a binary. Or that those in the ‘liberty’ spectrum, which can range from all types of anarchists, agorists and whatever passes for libertarian these days, have more in common than not. The belief that Right and Left are constants and relate specifically to the Western, mostly American politics, is shallow. Regardless.

During his tenure as a libertarian spokesperson, Penn Jillete would offer the simplistic explanation, “Left on sex and drugs, Right on economics,” to best explain his politics. Which for many would be how one could define modern libertarianism. Such summaries of politics and brief bytes reduce issues and philosophies into insignificant associations. Libertarian is far more complicated and interesting than political ‘bisexualism’.

Before Murray Rothbard, libertarian was associated with ‘left’ politics, as was various forms of anarchism and even agorism. Now, for whatever reasons it needs to be defined by either ‘left’ or ‘right’, both of which changes costume frequently enough. The modern, mostly American depiction of libertarian is frequently claimed to be Right wing or Right adjacent. Perhaps this is because, ‘free market economics’ are at least claimed to be Right wing?

The debate between Murray and Smith was mostly focused on foreign policy, rather than the nuances of libertarianism but it extends to the differentiating views between both men. One, of a collectivist who sees the world broken up into groups. The other, an individualist, who understands the world to be made up of individuals. Collectivist and Individualist, as such. Not, Left or Right.

The Left and Right, have more in common than not. It’s only in the extremes of both or from within specific niches, where actual principles according to both matter, on those fringes do real distinct differences occur. As political animals, both tend to be incestuous siblings.

The same can go for libertarians, who indulge in politics and alliances. The politics in itself transcending claimed principles. It is the nature of politics that leads to the temptations of bisexuality in this context. Deviant flirtation, making allies, of achieving shared goals. In the case of certain issues it seems that such political animals enjoy the orgiastic delights of agreement.

In this metaphor, would it not be more apt at claiming that libertarians are Asexual, unlike their more politically motivated associates, Libertarians, inc who may be outright ‘gay’ or ‘straight’ to whatever leaning takes their fancy.

It’s all rather confusing. And I say this as someone who is grappling with the writing of a book on complex sexuality.

Murray’s statement was thrown out as a slur, as though one must be either Gay or Straight. Or in this case, Left and Right. Which side do those who embrace Murray as their mouthpiece associate with being the likeness to their politics, Homo or Heterosexual? Murray could have also just said it as a gay old remark, frivolous and to be swallowed with little regard.

Political orientation assumes that one side of politics is wrong, and that the other side is correct. As an openly gay man, would this then assume that conservative politics is homosexual? Then again, it seems that many from such a political spectrum can in fact be gay, or even bisexual or whatever sexual convenience suits them. Albeit closeted. Despite the woke fetish to unite sexuality and partisan politics.

Murray has his views and many of them are rather conventional. That does not mean that they are entirely in line with the Right or Left zeitgeist. For example when it comes to his opinion on Palestine, only the extremes of both seem to view it as a genocide. Those who make up the politically generic or what some would call the ‘uniparty’, there seems to be wider support for Israeli policy. To the Palestinians and their dying and starving a ‘left’ Biden or a ‘right’ Trump administration have made little difference.

In the case of the Ukraine war, again it’s with the more Left leaning of generic politics that tends to favour support in the war against Russia. Then again, from within the mainstream of Right wing politics there is also an anti-Russia focus. A desire to keep the proxy war going for as long as possible to bleed Russia. The sacrifice of Ukrainian lives being a price that they are willing to pay.

Murray can also argue, that the Ukrainians are defending themselves from an invader. Though, in the case of Palestine, this would be incorrect in his mind. In the case of Afghanistan, Iraq, Vietnam and so on, I am sure that it would also be incorrect. It all depends on who the invader is, and who such an invasion favours.

When it comes to prosecuting of war, there seems to be a consensus among Left and Right of party politics, a bi-partisan agreement. ‘Bisexual’ politics one might say.

Libertarians or those in the anti-war liberty movement are not “bi.” There is more to two sides, and two ideals when it comes to many issues. The nature of politics is conflation, coercion and seduction. Those with principles tend to remain pure and virginal, they don’t need to get fcucked by the bullshit breathed political class, nor do they need to sodomise another group of innocent people out of a need for political expedience. The vulgarity of politics is that it pretends to be decent, polite and intellectual when in reality it is crude, vile and plunges bayonets into the bellies of countless people all in the name of policy or, like any rapist, self interest.

Ford Follies: The Toilet Chronicles

fordtoilet2

One never knew the “brown-water” (riverine) navy would take to the high seas in this alpha example of engineering excellence.

Did you know they designed the Ford with no urinals? We all know why and those toilets instead of the water-less urinals so common today have extraordinary performance during turbulent sea states. They based the toilet system on that used in commercial aircraft. Have they ever been on a commercial aircraft? Those are and always have been terrible.

No urinals on a ship at sea.

In addition, in another stroke of planning and foresight, the eleven weapons elevators, which sailors use to move provisions between decks, are too small to accommodate a pallet jack or forklift. They weapons elevators are also set on a serial circuit so if one goes down they all malfunction.

The USS George HW Bush (CVN-77) has the same toilet system and the same problem. Is it unreasonable to expect the Ford, costing about 6 billion more than the Bush, including working and updated shitters?

Acid flushing is a standard routine to clean out VCHT (Vacuum Collection Holding Tank) systems on every single ship in the Navy.

You can’t make this shit up…

In the famous words of Scotty from Star Trek III: “The more they overthink the plumbing, the easier it is to stop up the drain.”

Ship workers had to use an expensive acid wash to the tune of $400,000 each time that a toilet was stuck.

The toilets were supposed to work like those on a commercial airplane but they became an embarrassing problem. And even though the remedy was so pricey, the Navy had no plans to change the toilet design that serves over 4,000 people on the floating air bases.

$400,000 To Fix a Toilet? U.S. Navy’s Ford-Class Aircraft Carrier Is a Problem

 

The Most Expensive Armed Forces You Can Buy for the Wrong Century

dodprocurement

The Pentagon needs to be taken apart root and branch, a sterling track record of defeat and stalemate for eight decades accustoms the malefactors to continue doing what they are doing when NO ONE is punished for naked and persistent incompetence, misappropriation and courts martial.

If PowerPoint were a weapon, no one would stand a chance against the American armed forces.

A one year stand-down of all military mischief overseas and a mass realignment starting with firing every flag officer and subjecting them to deep & embarrassing IG investigations is the only way.

Every last one of them.

America’s very expensive trillion dollar a year enterprise is a magnificent 20th century military dinosaur not fit for purpose for 21st century peer combat.

US Shipbuilding Crises Reaches a Crescendo

shipbuild

In a cavalcade of calamities from a skilled workforce to a broken acquisition process to  a strategic deficit disorder that does not acknowledge the Revolutions in Military Affairs that are dominating and radically changing how naval warfare is evolving.

The US Navy has the most advanced twentieth century naval surface combatant force on Earth in 2025. In the emerging salvo competition with quantity having a quality all of its own, the US surface navy is continuing to reinforce technology that is increasingly inadequate and anachronistic in the evolving war continuum. Warship force projection requires the ability to safely transit to the area of operations, fight the ships and bring them home. Yemen has proven that even non-naval powers can soundly defeat the US Navy. Has Yemen sunk a US vessel yet? No. Has the Red Sea drama spent billions in munitions in a critically shallow magazine inventory? Yes. Has Yemen forced the Navy to be on the verge of “battle stations” at all time.

As the article below illustrates, the ship-building crisis will take years if not decades to turn the ship around on creating and building (and maintaining) both surface and subsurface manned ships. I suspect by the time the USN fixes the acquisition problem, the entire notion of manned surface naval vessels may be a moot point.

Absent a mass firing of flag officers and senior government managers, none of this will be repaired and made right.

Over the next three years, the Navy plans on retiring 13 more ships than it will commission, shrinking the fleet to 283 ships by 2027. According to the Navy’s current plan, the fleet will grow to 515 crewed and uncrewed vessels by 2054. To reach that goal, the Congressional Budget Office estimates the Navy will spend more than $1 trillion, nearly $36 billion each year for the next three decades on shipbuilding alone.

It remains unclear if the Navy can realize its plan, even if Congress provides the funds. Ramping up naval construction is not simply a matter of resources. The Navy spent $2.3 billion between 2018 and 2023 to increase the capacity of the submarine shipyards. Despite this investment, the production rate for Virginia-class attack submarines decreased from around two boats per year to 1.2.

In just 10 years after the end of the Cold War, the number of skilled shipyard workers shrank from 62,000 to 21,000. The number of workers has increased since 2001, but shortages remain. During a 2024 symposium, the director of the Navy’s Submarine Industrial Base Program said the United States needs to hire 140,000 workers just to meet the needs of the current submarine building program.

https://responsiblestatecraft.org/us-navy/

Email me at cgpodcast@pm.me

Podcasts

scotthortonshow logosq

coi banner sq2@0.5x

liberty weekly thumbnail

Don't Tread on Anyone Logo

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

Pin It on Pinterest