Blog

The Case for Not Voting

The Case for Not Voting

I recently joined Bretigne Shaffer again on her show, this time to discuss not who Americans should vote for but whether they should vote. We made the case that the most socially responsible course of action is to not vote.

It was a great discussion, and whatever your thoughts on voting, I am certain that you will find it intellectually stimulating; and even if Bretigne and I don’t manage to persuade you to our view, you will at least have some serious food for thought. If you aim to vote, I challenge you to consider this other point of view that you will never be exposed to by the mainstream media!

Listen below, or watch the full video version of the interview on Bretigne’s Substack.

Highlights

How we don’t have a legitimate government but a criminal organization in Washington, DC:

read more…

The Royal Navy Submarine Force Remains Surfaced

faslane

The Royal Navy is experiencing readiness and maintenance shortfalls in its submarine force that is similar to the throughput problems for the US nuclear submarine forces. The logistical tail for exquisite platforms like nuclear submarines is enormous and a first world nation is the only entity capable of deploying these boats. The Royal Navy is not up to the task.

Here is my forecast: the Royal Navy will never be a blue water fleet action war machine again for the remainder of this century (if the UK lasts that long). Especially when you take the one third rule into account for peacetime navies which means that one third are in operational status, one third in maintenance and one third in training.

In wartime, one may see increased deployments but those will be offset by losses.

You will see a complete reassessment of surface navy efficacy in the next generation that will be driven by a demand to completely adapt to new unmanned and hyper-sonic realities that existentially threaten current naval thinking for surface warfare.

screenshot 2024 08 06 at 09 47 37 the royal navy size and strength over time in visuals

This graphic is from 2017 and if any readers have an updated list of RN surface ships, I am obliged if you send it to me. As of 2023, the Royal Navy had 80 vessels, including warships and non-commissioned vessels. 29% are in refit or maintenance or some type of inactive status.

ALL six hunter-killer subs are stuck in port as the Royal Navy has no working docks for repairs (presently).

The nuclear-powered vessels are designed to hunt Russian subs, spy on Britain’s enemies and deliver special forces on secret missions.

But none of the Astute-class subs — the fleet’s newest — have conducted a single operational voyage this year.

HMS Ambush has not sailed for two years.

HMS Audacious has spent 15 months in His Majesty’s Naval Base Devonport.

The mess is worse than you think.

HMS Artful has been 14 months at HMNB Clyde, where HMS Astute has been since December.

A ship-lift to crane subs out of the water at Faslane has been out of action for over a year after the firm that made the ropes closed down, and the Navy couldn’t replace them.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/29679184/six-british-hunter-killer-subs-stuck-in-port/

My Substack

Email me at cgpodcast@pm.me.

The F35 Follies: Britannia Rules a Little

SF_F-35B Racing By Trailing Vapes_JAKMy recommendation to the British MoD: don’t buy anymore of these flying failure factories.

U.K. planned to buy138 F-35s, bought 48, delivered 35, aims at 75 by 2025.

Judging from the delays and failures universally in the program, achieving a delivery of all functional fighters is probably a pipe dream. Since the readiness rate for the F35B (carrier-borne) in US hands is below 20 percent, one can imagine the the British will not be able to keep that percentage aloft. Do the math and single digits of these aircraft still functional in five years is not a sure bet.

Not to mention the two new massive oil-fired 65,000-ton Queen Elizabeth-class carriers can’t safely navigate beyond the shores of England without a catastrophic engine casualty. They may become very expensive aircraft ferries to tour the circumference of the UK.

The Royal Navy is a shadow of its former majesty and there is simply no future for a blue-water armada under the Union Jack for the remainder of this century, if England lasts that long since London is a first world city in a third world country.

The extinction of British steel on the alter of the green religion will play a role in this demise that will roll well into the future.

Former Trotskyist Keir Starmer is the new PM of the rickety old England and the new UK Labor government is reviewing military spending and is unclear on F-35B fate. The UK is also the only country to solely purchase the naval F-35B S/VTOL variant of the fighter for both its navy and air force.

For a long time, the stated goal of the UK was to purchase 138 F-35s, but later, the government seemed to grow cold on that number and seemed to want to reduce it. However, with the outbreak of the war in Ukraine, the UK affirmed its plan to eventually purchase 138 F-35s.

While Labour may adjust the number of F-35Bs to be procured, it is highly unlikely to cancel the F-35 program. The new government will undoubtedly adjust Britain’s military procurement, but it is unclear at this point what those adjustments will be. Labour has committed itself to increasing military expenditure to 2.5% of GDP “as soon as they can” (up from around 2.1% now).

Labour also claims the previous government “failed on defense” and that under the Torys, “200 aircraft have been taken out of service in the last five years alone.” It is possible Labour will increase the number of fighter jets to be purchased – time will tell.

https://simpleflying.com/what-to-know-britains-f-35-lightning-ii-program/

My Substack

Email me at cgpodcast@pm.me

 

Anti-War Blog – Not Enough Paper Cranes

Anti-War Blog – Not Enough Paper Cranes

When I was in primary school we were taught about a little Japanese girl named Sadako Sasaki and her paper cranes. She was one of the many victims of the Hiroshima atomic bomb blast, dying after the initial detonation from radiation sickness. One of many thousands who would die painfully in the days, weeks, months and years following the bombs explosion. We learned that in the time before her impending death, she had set a goal of making 1,000 paper Origami cranes. She died at 644. We even learned a song, and a group of ten year old Australian sang and put on a play, pretending to be Japanese children who died from the blast. Then we were told that the bombings were necessary. That the babies, children had to die. The greater good. Collective punishment. We were educated. Killing Sadako saved American lives. Next subject. The next dance to be performed to Tina Turner’s Nutbush City Limits. The ten year old’s forgetting Sadako.

It’s that time of year, when the anniversary of the atomic bombs of Japan are upon us. It’s a period where the culmination of all bombings, on every belligerent city is justified. We are taught that the fascists bombing Guenica or the blitz on London was wrong, the enemies intentional bombing of civilians an evil act that validates their evil status as an enemy. When the Allies bombed French, Italian, German, Romanian, Phillipine and Japanese towns and cities we are told it was a necessity. The Axis were evil. The babies, children included. Even those in occupied nations.

An American GI in Vietnam was quoted as saying, “We need to burn down the village in order to save it.” Perhaps one needs to murder millions in order to save them.

The Japanese empire was evil, it murdered millions, raped, tortured. The ancient Chinese capital of Nangking is forever to be associated with what the Japanese soldierrs did to it’s inhabitants. Like a blight, the empire of Japan savaged Asia, embracing a colonialism which was allowable for Europeans decades earlier. This was the twentieth century, the Japanese could not have such an empire. At least not at the expense of the British, Dutch, French or US empires.

Then the US bombed Korea, to the point that the Air Force ran out of targets. Destroying the North, wooden hut or bridge it did not matter. Millions died. Biological weapons were even dropped. Those developed by the sinister Japanese scientists who had become US assets. The very Japanese military torturers many use to justify the nuking of little Sadako, shared their putrid secrets with Uncle Sam who then used them on Koreans and Chinese. The Japanese had done that too. Though at the time, North Korea was not known as a pariah entity, not to the point of Imperial Japan or Nazi Germany. Communist imperialism was a danger that needed to be opposed, opposed by murdering the people it enslaved. Every enemy leader was the next Hitler, while millions of the next Sadako’s suffered.

Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam would follow in the decades after Korea. More bombs were dropped on Laos, than were dropped in all of World War Two. “They just kept sending us more bombs,” an Air Force man said when asked why. More bombs were dropped on South Vietnam, the allied side, than were dropped in the North, the enemy side. Millions died. Even to this day, the chemicals used to obliterate nature and human life poisons generations later. Bombs and mines randomly explode, shredding mostly the young to death or maiming them for life. All those bombs and lives taken to free the Vietnamese? Save American lives? Freedom? To preserve the Union?

Hundreds of thousands of Sadako’s suffered. Blown to pieces, burned to death, maimed, born into mutated agony all so that men in uniform could enforce policies for men in suits. When the war was over those places became historical chapters, the mass death down played or ignored. It was after all how the greatest nation on Earth learned to wage war. Killing them all. Tokyo fire bombings, Hiroshima, Nagasaki, ‘saved American lives and ended the war’. A war that was ending long before the Los Alamo tests. A war that all but ended when the Japanese had been suing for peace, months before. A war that was allowed to end the moment the Soviet Union destroyed the Japanese forces in North China, Korea and Manchuria. The Allies now needed a healthy Japan to curtail the next enemy, Soviet imperialism.

It’s all complicated I suppose. Blowing up children, wiping out families. Strangers who have no say in policy, individuals who never stabbed a woman in China with their penis or bayonet, babies not even born when Pearl Harbor was attacked, they are all Japs. All the same race, from the same nation. So goes the collectivist rationale. Sadoko may as well have been Tojo or a Japanese swordsman beheading prisoners. Do collectivists allow that reasoning to reverse? That their babies, their children should also be fair game should the national government they either support or have no love for does evil? Or is it more primal than that. Despite the facade of order, justice, civility the savage and ancient supremacy, to conquer and wipe out the other. Sadako is thus inferior. Kill them all! We have the facade, and the reality. Silver B-29’s may as well be horseback archers churning up the steppes in blood.

On my computer, I have this image of a mother, her body burned to impossible recognition. Beneath her, still attached is an umbilical cord that leads to a baby. As her body was burned in napalm, she gave birth. Perhaps natures instinct, to save the child as the mother dies. A last ditch hope of life. Instead mother and new born baby lay as burned remnants among a city full of burned remnants. Scientists tinkered to perfect chemicals and metallurgy, engineers conceived machines and mechanisms that trained war fighters could fly and use so that mother and child may lay lost to history, as burned images on a screen. I stare at such a photo knowing out there are many who will remind me that the mother and child deserved to die. They needed to die. The killers, scientists, engineers, are heroes. The baby, not even named, an enemy. It takes a love of government or some form of nationalism to think that way. To hate a mother and baby so much, that they should be burned to death as little Sadako dies from the bombs radiation.

Unfortunately little Sadako did not make enough cranes to save herself, or anyone else for that matter. Though her killers did build more bombs and planes. No one wants paper cranes, making them doesn’t pay very well, if at all. Next August it will be the same, the bombs loved. The dead, deserving of their fate. Perhaps humanity is at it’s 644 paper cranes, “May the crane of peace fly everywhere!” This is our cry, this is our prayer, “Crane of peace fly everywhere!”

August, 2024

Speaking of democracy…

Democracy has been a much discussed topic of late, what with the separation of President Joe Biden from his delegates only weeks before the upcoming Democratic party convention, to be held in Chicago from August 19 to 22, 2024.

There have been brokered conventions in history before, but will Vice President Kamala Harris secure the Democratic party’s presidential nomination after entirely bypassing the primary process and receiving not a single vote from the electorate? Only time will tell.

Right before the DNC palace coup, and just after the attempt on former President Trump’s life, Alex Bernardo interviewed Laurie Calhoun on The Protestant Libertarian Podcast, focusing on the question:

Is Democracy a Sham?

The springboard for this discussion was an essay, “Sham-ocracy, Scam-ocracy,” published by the Libertarian Institute on June 17, 2024.

 

Corruption-A-Go-Go: Taliban Continues to Receive US Funding

statetaliban

The US State Department needs to be disbanded and all overseas embassies should be converted to ATM-style kiosks.

The Taliban has just received 239 million debt-bucks in US State Department aid.

239 millions dollars.

The disaster in Afghanistan continues to cascade forward and is now underwritten by unborn taxpayers.

The government watchdog, the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR), issued a July 2024 report identifying at least 29 grants where the Taliban may have erroneously received counterterrorism funds.

But the funds have already been distributed despite violating the standards for release.

However, we analyzed DRL’s vetting documentation and found that it only provided us with supporting vetting
documentation for three of its seven awards. The four awards missing documentation were missing other types
of supporting vetting documentation in addition to the missing risk assessments, such as final eligibility
notices. This means that even if DRL had provided us with the missing risk assessments, the four awards
would still be missing other supporting documentation.

https://justthenews.com/world/middle-east/taliban-gets-239-million-aid-after-bad-state-dept-vetting

Very detailed summary of US State Department incompetence here:

https://www.sigar.mil/pdf/audits/SIGAR-24-31-AR.pdf

My Substack

Email me at cgpodcast@pm.me.

Further China Reading

From a reader:

“Hello Joseph. I just ordered your book, and I noticed it was short. I would like to know if there is an up to date book on American foreign policy towards China that you could recommend that is well-researched and truthful with good policy suggestions. Thanks!

I know next to nothing about America-China relations and I am looking forward to reading your book.”

My response:

“I wish I could […] the fact I can’t is a major reason I am working on a much longer book focused solely on the evolution of American policy toward China. Thanks for reading!”

So, yes, once the National Debt and You: What it is, How it Works, and Why it Matters is finished (which should be soon), I will begin working full time on the, to date, unnamed project focused strictly on Sino-American relations, a timely topic that no one seems to be able to deal with objectively, whatever their particular bias.

In the meantime, the book should be done by this tine next year, I will be focused on making sure to get out two pieces a month at the Institute focused on a specific aspect of US policy regarding China or an important event in the history of the relationship.

If there is something specific you’d like to see addressed in the coming months, then, please reach out and let me know!

Raptor Woes Continue to Plague the Air Force

f22

More mismanagement and strategic deficit disorder at the Pentagon.

The F22 Raptor is a very capable late 20th century aircraft and arguably superior to the much more expensive and increasingly anachronistic  F35; it is being put out to pasture early because of planning missteps, acquisition problems, maintenance issues, software difficulties and a distinctly dysfunctional strategic environment that is not prepared for the near-peer and peer fight ahead.

Both the F22 and the F35 are maintenance hogs and expensive to maintain over their lifetimes.

If the Air Force and the US Congress don’t find a way to pay for the NGAD program and Congress lets the Air Force retire 32 older F-22s, the Air Force could soon find itself in a dangerous position: with a need to wrest control of the air from a growing and modernizing Chinese air force with a shrinking and aging fleet of F-22s – and with no help on the horizon for potentially decades to come.

Incredibly, those 32 older Block 20s aren’t the only fighters the Air Force wants to retire early. The service also wants to cut half of its Boeing F-15E Strike Eagle fighter-bombers while simultaneously reducing the number of new F-15EXs it buys. 

The cuts might be less worrying if the Air Force’s other in-production fighter, the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II, weren’t such a disaster. The Air Force is decades behind and hundreds of billions of dollars over-budget compared to its original plan to acquire more than 1,700 F-35s – and hasn’t taken delivery of a new F-35 in a year as it waits for testers to work out kinks in the fighter’s latest software build. 

The Air Force is in a fighter crisis. But it’s not going to solve that crisis by grounding training jets – and shrinking an air-superiority force that’s probably already far too small. 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/travel/news/the-us-air-force-seems-hell-bent-on-getting-rid-of-its-greatest-ever-fighter-jet/ar-BB1plHiE

If they reach 1700 F35s (present strength is 1,000 produced and not many aloft), I will be shocked but I will be even more shocked if they achieve a readiness rate above 30% of air-frames.

In this new era of the 21st century air wars, whenever you hear Western flag officers talk about air dominance, supremacy and superiority; they are speaking to the past with no martial eye to the future. I suspect the perfect record of stalemate and defeat for US arms since 1945 will continue apace.

Here’s the very real strategic error: the era of manned fighter aircraft is over and the sooner the US and the West realize this, it will possibly lead to a complete reappraisal of what air combat looks like in the 21st century.

My Substack

Email me at cgpodcast@pm.me.

Podcasts

scotthortonshow logosq

coi banner sq2@0.5x

liberty weekly thumbnail

Don't Tread on Anyone Logo

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

Pin It on Pinterest