Blog

US Hypersonics Off to Stuttering Start (Again)

This is part of the “prompt strike” initiative trying to increase the speed of delivery of munitions operationally. It took two years of delays to have a first test launch in December 2024 (maybe, Pentagon is shady on launch date actual); The missile at the core of Dark Eagle, also known as the Long Range Hypersonic Weapon (LRHW), is the same one the Navy plans to arm its Zumwalt class stealth destroyers and future Block V Virginia class submarines with.

Here’s rudimentary graphic illustrating the parabolic differences between launch modes.

Why the Pentagon publishes milestones on these blue sky programs, I wonder at and I know they do so per Congressional pressure but this is yet another program where I suspect the concepts and requirements left of bang did not do their homework properly.

While firing a missile from the Dark Eagle launcher is a major milestone, the fact that it has only come now underscores the problems that have been dogging the system’s development for years. The Army scrubbed three planned launches last year. The Pentagon did announce a successful end-to-end common AUR test in June, but that had made use of a different ground-based launch apparatus.

https://www.twz.com/land/army-dark-eagle-hypersonic-missile-finally-blasts-out-of-its-launcher

Of course, the worm turns:

Following the apparent cancellation of the U.S. Air Force’s AGM-183A Air-launched Rapid Response Weapon (ARRW) program in 2023, it appeared that Dark Eagle would become the U.S. military’s first operational novel hypersonic weapon. At this stage, there’s still some uncertainty surrounding ARRW status and there could still be plans for a follow-on effort.

https://www.twz.com/land/pentagon-still-unsure-about-lethality-of-dark-eagle-hypersonic-missile

I have mentioned in my podcasts that the term “near peer” is no longer useful in any explanatory framework for 21st century warfare and this sort of marks that officially. All warfare on the conventional front are now peer competitors. I will forecast that the BRICS countries will start to pull ahead in these modes of missile delivery as the US acquisition system gyrates in bureaucratic red tape and the death spiral gyre of defense spending. Building these at scale and ensuring operational readiness in quantity in addition to all the teething problems of deployment puts these at least a decade out.

Conventional SLBMs or ICBMs may be much more effective than the hypersonic weapons the US is pursuing. Both in performance and cost. Especially if they are MIRV and/or MARV configurations. In the arcane specialty of building missiles, there is constant tension between Mach speed/velocity and the munitions payload because at a certain point, the increased speed obviates the need for an exploding warhead munition. To cause damage by kinetic energy alone you need mass and velocity. The hazard is mistaken identification of a nuclear armed launch BUT what if the increased speeds of munitions is making the “lethal payload” less important than the destructive energy release of terminal contact with the ground that creates near-nuclear effects with no residual radiation?

In the graphic above, natural space exposure requires very expensive onboard protection of electronics suites in the missile body the higher the parabolic path but the cruise & aeroballistic missiles don’t have those requirements (air-breathing) hence the increased common usage of these will put them in the hands of Third World armed forces (think Yemen and Armenia/Azerbaijan) in the next decade. If you survive until 2040, you will look back and be astonished at the changes in the ways of war.

Again, flattening and expanding the distribution curve to all armed combatants on Earth with these missile variants being able to destroy or neutralize very expensive exquisite platforms like carriers, surface ships and all manner of ground vehicles from manned to tanks to infantry fighting vehicles is here to stay.

Spicy times ahead.

 
Email me at cgpodcast@pm.me

Carrier Follies: Yet Another Failure Arrow in the Quiver

forddbr1

You had one job. Well, two. You can’t launch and receive aircraft reliably. Nor apparently can you detect and deploy sensor capabilities to aim the aircraft that occasionally leave the very expensive deck.

The radar has actually degraded over time.

forddbr2

The dual-band radar (DBR) aboard the Navy aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78), the ship’s primary sensor system, struggled to perform during a pre-deployment exercise and suffered failures as it grappled with the constant need for radar coverage. It remains unclear whether DBR’s issues impacted Ford’s operations during its first full deployment, which began in May 2023 and was extended before ending in January 2024, but the Navy is now seeking to replace Ford’s DBR entirely.

These findings are part of the Pentagon’s Director Operational Test and Evaluation (DOT&E) annual report released last week. The document contains revelations regarding what the Navy will need to do to continue using the DBR, which was only installed aboard Ford and a truncated version of it exists in the three ships of the USS Zumwalt (DDG-1000) class. The full DBR suite was supposed to equip these ships before being scaled back significantly a decade ago, mainly due to cost concerns. In addition to DBR, the latest DOT&E report also offers fresh insights into the state of the Navy’s newest carrier, how it performed during deployment and the potential for rough seas ahead.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/uss-gerald-r-ford-still-004554296.html?guccounter=1

 
Email me at cgpodcast@pm.me
David Hearst Explains Trump’s Plan to Ethnically Cleanse Gaza

David Hearst Explains Trump’s Plan to Ethnically Cleanse Gaza

In the video below, David Hearst, the editor-in-chief of Middle East Eye, provides an excellent overview and analysis of US President Donald Trump’s agenda.

When Israel and Hamas reached a ceasefire agreement just prior to Trump’s inauguration, the media acknowledged his team’s role in the negotiations but claimed that Trump “pressured” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to accept the ceasefire.

That narrative is completely false. It was not a stick but a carrot that Trump used. It is now clear that Trump basically promised to help Israel complete the ethnic cleansing of Gaza in the wake of Israel’s genocidal military assault on the strip’s civilian infrastructure and population, which forced the International Criminal Court (ICC) into a position of issuing an arrest warrant for Netanyahu or demonstrating its own irrelevance.

We can also deduce that Trump essentially green-lighted the occupation and settlement regime in the West Bank and effective annexation of Palestinian land, notwithstanding the July 2024 ruling of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) that Israel’s occupation violates international law and amounts to the crime of apartheid.

While sitting alongside Netanyahu in Washington, DC, Trump effectively proclaimed that Israel had succeeded in rendering Gaza uninhabitable, which was an aim that of course the genocide apologists long denied was being implemented on the ground despite this intent being literally observable on the ground well over a year ago.

Israel has systematically targeted and destroyed Palestinians’ homes, schools, hospitals, agricultural land, greenhouses, etc.

However, if Trump believed that the Palestinians would agree to be dislocated from Gaza because of Israel’s destruction, and that Israel’s Arab neighbors would be delighted to assist in the plan to complete the ethnic cleansing that Israel started in 1948, he sorely miscalculated.

Watch Hearst’s video for a spot-on analysis of the present situation:

Cross-posted from JeremyRHammond.com.

“Riviera of the Middle East…”

“Riviera of the Middle East…”

There’s optimism among the small government conservatives, liberty nationalists and MAGA hardliners from the first weeks of Trumps second presidency. The exposure of USAID to the world, revealing waste, nefarious conduct and ideologically bias that only proves that they were right.

The US government is fascinating, it’s full of departments and agencies that continue to conduct themselves with little or no oversight or do things in secret or in the open. The government trips over itself, works against it’s own claimed interests but above all else it allows presidents and the government itself plausible deniability. Scandals don’t really harm it, no matter how many Church committee hearings, Iran-Contra scandals, Snowden leaks, Wikileaks or DOGE audits the government remains.

The people seem to love it despite it all, reforms and hearings the thoughts and prayers for the sacred government, to be born again with each election, rejuvenated. Currently it’s being cleansed by the orange flames of Trumpism.

Elon Musk heads the DOGE charge purging the US government of waste, dangling skeletons in the many wardrobes for all of us to see. In time, just as Matt Taibbi was given access to the ‘Twitter files’, we may have a whole stack or hard drives, DOGE files. The inner mechanisms and sinister stupidity of agencies and departments, wasting tax payers dollars through policies of ideological ineptitude along with foreign policy nihilism.

The rejection of the pandemic lockdown and censorship masters has led to their defeat, the ‘deplorables’ as Hilary Clinton slurred them won. Above all else, the tired public sick of elitist overlords now have change. RFK, jr sat in front of corrupt politicians to tell them to their faces that they take bribe money from pharmaceutical companies. The common person cheers. The prior establishment obedient minded make excuses. For now, those who decreed, “let them eat cake,” are losing their heads in tantrums and with impotent rees. The ancient regime is falling…

While this all may be on the domestic front, will much change with foreign policy?

Differing US agencies at times have their assets fighting another agencies proxy forces. This occurred during the War on Terror and most recently with the Syrian civil war to the current coup de main which saw a ‘reformed’ Al Qaeda (formerly known as Islamo Fascists, AKA Islamic Extremists ie terrorists) cleansed by Western media depictions as moderate rebels now victorious in defeating the Assad government. Though some in the shameless legacy media has walked back such praise for the terrorist victors, though their mostly goldfish viewers barely noticed. Enemies, frenemies, assets, proxies, terrorists, all really depends on the given department of the US governments perspectives and needs

Let’s speculate while the Trump 2.0 administration is less than a month in, what if they do strip the US government down. A Trump chainsaw inspired by Javier Millei of Argentina, himself inspired by Trump 1.0, hacks and cuts away waste and spending. This time the swamp will not only be drained but defoliated by Agent Orangeman. The government monopoly and favouritism of the past eroded and a sort of freedom blossoms. The US debt clock slows and maybe even reverses. The tax cuts and reforms strip the US government down to a minarchistic fantasy. The domestic economy thrives, people are free and victimless crimes dwindle away, Trumptopia emerges.

BUT…

Trump and his administration revert back to his eminent domain real estate inclinations on the foreign policy front. The US attempts to “own” Gaza and removes the Palestinians from what remains of their homes. Contracts go to US businesses so that they may develop Gaza into a high rise paradise built above countless corpses. The Israeli settlers are given preferences, the Palestinians suffering a final indignity. Ethnic cleansing without the deception of politically correct platitudes, just abrupt Trump honest, standing alongside Israel.

Genocide Joe is out, Re-settlement Trump is in, the US government and Israel ever the same.

Most nations outside of Israel have condemned Trump’s statement. It’s been called Ethnic Cleansing. Joe Biden had prior suggested it but he was unable to gain support. Trump uses his statements as a negotiating tool, diplomacy is just business. The fascinating thing is that those who are quick to condemn Trump’s real estate minded statements seem to have been alright with the year plus genocide. Thousands killed, starved, bombed, terrorised as an act of Israeli state policy was not condemned or viewed as, ‘too far.’ The honest and brash words of Trump are however.

What did people think the ambitions of Israeli policy makers were in Gaza? They always intended to turn it into a piece of real estate for themselves and wealthy foreigners to invest in and enjoy. The Palestinians have been murdered to achieve this ends. Trump told the world as it is. I guess the truth hurts, it’s also a revelation of hypocrisy.

But also…

What if, the US does deploy forces to Greenland, raise the flag just as Argentine once did on the Malvinas-Falklands. Though this time there is no task force sent to eject them. Denmark is no Thatcherite UK. What if the US does nationalise the Panama canal and what if it does go to war with the Cartels just South of their border? Bogging the US into an ugly insurgency so close to home?

Would the celebration of a transparent and stripped back domestic government be enough to purge the sins of an ever aggressive foreign policy built on 20th century nation building, 19th century imperialism and good ole fashioned US exceptionalism?

I suspect for some the answer would be a resounding, Yes.

How much damage would there for the advocates of liberty who endorsed and are at times ‘soft’ or welcoming of the current administration? Despite his tariffs, the tax cuts alone may be enough to seduce advocates of liberty. And if we enter a new phase of wars and colonialism, an accelerated Israel first doctrine, would revenge against Democrats and less Federal debt be enough for some to wash away all that blood?

Just take the win, bro”

The “politics bros” who like to critique libertarians and anarchists, while relying entirely on the energy and digital infrastructure of such a philosophy have an affection to father figure dictators and anyone that sticks it to cultural enemies. For most of his life, Trump was a New York liberal and has rather progressive inclinations and instincts but when that red hat goes on, they have their Daddy. They are nationalists at heart, some supremacists, but are fixated on revenge against those who pushed the pandemic lock downs, the PC culture, the censorship. Now they want power, the power to cancel, to punish, to censor, to be the rulers. These are not people of principle. They are at best political animals or most likely shitposters who want a homogenised version of the world.

That is why Trump and Elon’s DOGE is appealing. The great war between 4chan and Tumblr never ended. He will not divide us! May no longer be chanted by Shia LaBeouf and friends but the anthem of Pepe does play on.

For a decade podcasters, social media personalities and memes that meandered adjacent to the antiwar and pro individual liberty spectrum suggested or outright claimed that such people are allies, friends. They are not. Just because the neocons and Democrats are so loathsome and disgusting does not mean any political adversity to them is a friend of liberty.

It was all mashed into a confused criticism of Disney hatred, “go woke and go broke”, the mentality that ruled the criticverse blended with those of politics and cultural warfare. The ideology is barely ideological, just all one big meme. Trump is Pepe. But he is much more, he is the uncle that always promised to take them fishing, but never did or the father that went out for cigarettes. Who never returned. He has replaced that ideal. Has returned hope in national pride, identity and government itself.

Must all alternative political philosophies cling together?

The conservatives, post-libertarians, anti-woke, MAGA, liberty nationalists got what they wanted. We are now watching to see where the pragmatism leads. The hubris on display is immense, victors disease. Instead of focusing on Making America Great, at home, it seems that the rot which led to things that we have seen in USAID may be infecting the ambitions of the present administration. The two time US citizen and current Prime Minister of Israel applauds and agrees with the foreign policy direction of MAGA. “You are the greatest friend that Israel has ever had in the White House.”

Trump is confident. He will wave the flags and swords of jingoism which has a tendency of inspiring the proud, patriotic and Gadsen wavers to embrace war and empire. It’s in American interests, like the cronyism that toppled Latin American governments, the colonisation of Hawaii, the victory over the Spanish and taking their territories, to be a global policeman that walked the beat during the Cold War, carpet bombing South East Asia or the Marshall plan mindset that can buy allies and outspend enemies. Is this the great that is also desired? Another Morning in America or just more American mornings.

The US will take over Gaza.”

BRICS is an alliance opposed to US hegemony, China, India are ascending. Russia is still a military power and the people of the world who are non seduced by the miasma of ‘Western values’ meaning Eurocentric arrogance and Anglo-American-Franco supremacy have witnessed the Houthi, Taliban, and any other ‘inferior group’ defy the greatest military on the planet. The age of hubris and exceptionalism may be upon us for the US empire.

“Just take the win, bro…”

What is winning?

Politics and principles tend to rarely merge and the political have no principles.

The irony is DOGE may all just be a great meme and while it shall do some good and expose the vile nature of government, in the end it looks like it may just lead to more government. Or war. They may strip down the US government from the decay that had infested it, demolition, rebuild and gentrify it into a new tower, it will still be government. That can never be fixed because the incentives and arrogance remains the same regardless of how well the Oligarchs in charge meme.

Fixing Fight Club: A Missive to DOGE

strangelove

President Trump, SECDEF, Mr. Musk and DOGE,

I am the host of Chasing Ghosts: An Irregular Warfare Podcast and WarNotes: A Conflict Podcast.

You are about to embark on a dark journey to discover the existential mismanagement and beggared martial imagination of the military mandarins at the Pentagon. You have to prepare to do savage bureaucratic combat with the most financially well-endowed military machine in the history of mankind whose penchant for defeat and stalemate has an unblemished record since 1945. Bureaucratic knife-fighting and Machiavellian combat is the only martial skill they possess.

I have distilled the ten objectives that may finally bring the Pentagon closer to being an effective fighting modality.

1. You must utterly lay waste to the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) is a process used by the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) to determine the requirements for military weapon systems. This acquisition system has managed to spend trillions on exquisite platforms and weapons systems that are always a day late and enormously and ruinously expensive. Exhibit A is the aircraft carrier which is the cross and chariot of the 21st century. If the Soviets designed an acquisition system, it would look like ours.

2. 21st century warfare is characterized by three essential characteristics: robotics, autonomous targeting and the employment of hyper-velocity weapons systems.

Robotics from mud to space will not only dominate military conflict in this century through a rolling cascade of Revolutions in Military Affairs that will dwarf such forward momentum in past history but democratize the employment technology to the poorest countries to challenge the first world employment of exquisite platforms.

Autonomous targeting will be a necessity to remove humans in the loop because of the speed and high density of munitions aloft.

Hypersonics are not new (ICBMs and IRBMs have been hypersonic since the 1950s and the world still has no defense against them once they have tipped at apogee and return to earth) and the employment of high parabola weapons (missiles) and shallow parabola glide vehicles like the Fractional Orbital Bombardment Systems (FOBS) are the future whether the US and its weak allies agree or not. Employment and defense against them is Priority One from a species perspective and the Pentagon has failed miserably. I have catalogued hundreds of instances of this here at my blog entries at the Libertarian Institute where I am the Smedley D. Butler Fellow for Military Affairs.

3. The role of the infantry soldier is changing in a way it has never faced in the history of manned conflict for millennia where the technology is delivering weapons that can target individual soldiers or groups of them in a cost-effective fashion. And they can’t escape their fate. And no, there will be no Heinlein-inspired armored suits for super-soldiers, it makes no sense to do so when robots will fill the bill.

4. The US has utterly failed in aggregated fires synchronization systems that align sensors and effectors seamlessly to deliver neutralization and destruction in a peer conflict (there is no near peer conflict anymore; Yemen has proven to be a peer competitor to the US). The Russians have broken the code and the US has not.

5. Global hegemons always fail and fall even in a unipolar world because nothing concentrates the mind on surviving peer conflict than defensive arrangements left of bang. The Chinese and the Russians have a distinct martial advantage as regional hegemons concentrating on both offensive and defensive stratagems synchronized together. The US cannot defend its homeland from military threats, full stop.

6. The entire Professional Military Education (PME) system from A to Z must be ruthlessly gutted and remade in the image of a system that builds fighting men encouraged to embrace risk assumption instead of risk aversion and promulgates a Prussian culture of disobedience that rewards character, initiative and mission command from the lowest ranks (see Auftragstaktik). Burn all DEI influences to the ground, soldiers’ lives literally depend on their aggressive elimination with extreme prejudice.

7. A complete reassessment and rebuilding of the military personnel performance system and a drastic reduction in the number of flag officers and their useless bloated staffs that have been responsible for the perfect and unblemished cavalcade of calamities, failures and stalemates since 1945. Mr. Donald E. Vandergriff has the blueprint ready to go to fix the broken system.

8. Make eccentricity great again in the armed forces. ADM Rickover and the likes of TE Lawrence, Orde Wingate, John Boyd and Paul von Lettow-Vorbeck would not have a prayer in the modern armed forces promotion circus.

9. Create vigorous red teaming & “Tenth Man” entities through all the services and the Joint Staff whose sole purpose is disruption, uncomfortable questions and extrapolating the second and third order effects of every aspect of operations left of bang and after commencement of kinetic operations.

10. Last but not least, force the Department of Defense to take a knee and make defense of the homeland the first priority in everything. Considerations of defense fix the mind in a fashion that assesses heretofore unidentified gaps in knowledge and inquiry.

I have other ideas but this is a good start. Your examination of the DoD is literally a life or death consequence for America, make it count.

Good luck and Godspeed.

 
Email me at cgpodcast@pm.me

Abolish Antitrust!

“That there is inequality of ability or monetary income on the free market should surprise no one. As we have seen above, men are not ‘equal’ in their tastes, interests, abilities, or locations. Resources are not distributed “equally” over the earth.16 This inequality or diversity in abilities and distribution of resources insures inequality of income on the free market. And, since a man’s monetary assets are derived from his and his ancestors’ abilities in serving consumers on the market, it is not surprising that there is inequality of monetary wealth as well.

“The term ‘free competition,’ then, will prove misleading unless it is interpreted to mean free action, i.e., freedom to compete or not to compete as the individual wills.

“It should be clear from the foregoing discussion that there is nothing particularly reprehensible or destructive of consumer freedom in the establishment of a ‘monopoly price’ or in a cartel action. A cartel action, if it is a voluntary one, cannot injure freedom of competition and, if it proves profitable, benefits rather than injures the consumers. It is perfectly consonant with a free society, with individual self-sovereignty, and with the earning of money through serving consumers.

As Benjamin R. Tucker brilliantly concluded in dealing with the problem of cartels and competition:

‘That the right to cooperate is as unquestionable as the right to compete; the right to compete involves the right to refrain from competition; cooperation is often a method of competition, and competition is always, in the larger view, a method of cooperation … each is a legitimate, orderly, non-invasive exercise of the individual will under the social law of equal liberty….

‘Viewed in the light of these irrefutable propositions, the trust, then, like every other industrial combination endeavoring to do collectively nothing but what each member of the combination might fully endeavor to do individually, is, per se, an unimpeachable institution. To assail or control or deny this form of cooperation on the ground that it is itself a denial of competition is an absurdity. It is an absurdity, because it proves too much. The trust is a denial of competition in no other sense than that in which competition itself is a denial of competition. (Italics ours.) The trust denies competition only by producing and selling more cheaply than those outside of the trust can produce and sell; but in that sense every successful individual competitor also denies competition…. The fact is that there is one denial of competition which is the right of all, and that there is another denial of competition which is the right of none. All of us, whether out of a trust or in it, have a right to deny competition by competing, but none of us, whether in a trust or out of it, have a right to deny competition by arbitrary decree, by interference with voluntary effort, by forcible suppression of initiative.’

“This is not to say, of course, that joint co-operation or combination is necessarily ‘better than’ competition among firms. We simply conclude that the relative extent of areas within or between firms on the free market will be precisely that proportion most conducive to the well-being of consumers and producers alike. This is the same as our previous conclusion that the size of a firm will tend to be established at the level most serviceable to the consumers.”

—Murray N. Rothbard, Man, Economy, and State

Police State in Mexico? Thank you Donald Trump!

Timeline / First Term…

I will build the wall and Mexico will pay for it!

How?

I will slap huge tariffs on Mexico if they don’t stop the flow of people and drugs passing through their country and those big beautiful tariffs will cause Mexico to pay for the wall.

Mexico: OK, we will send thousands of troops to the border and to internal checkpoints in Mexico.

Result: Two-hour lines for Americans GOING INTO MEXICO ever since Trump’s first term because Mexican military now conducts thorough searches of everyone going into Mexico. Americans used to be able to drive easily into Mexico without delay. Everyone now has to wait hours going into Mexico and hours coming back. Mexico used to feel more like a free country than the U.S.; because it was.

Trump (still in first term): I will spare you the tariffs because you are creating more of a police state in Mexico and are being subordinate peons to me as your emperor.

Timeline / Second Term…

I will slap huge beautiful tariffs on Mexico because they are not stemming the flow of people and drugs!

Mexico: OK, we will send thousands more troops to the border and also install them at more internal checkpoints throughout Mexico.

Trump: I will spare you the tariffs again because you are being good obedient little children and are appropriately bending the knee to your emperor.

Result: More of a police state in Mexico.

A big thank you to all the Trump lovers and fake libertarians that actually love and promote militarism and state intervention in all of our lives.

Like Farm to Table, Shipyard to Mothballs

Image

USNS Cody

USNS Cody (T-EPF-14), Spearhead-class expeditionary fast transport, was christened on 25 February 2023 by ship’s sponsor Averil D. Spencer, launched at Austal USA in Mobile, Alabama on 20 March 2023, and its delivery was accepted by the U.S. Navy on 11 January 2024. These are a fine balance of weight (hence the aluminum construction) and speed capability. It’s a transport, not an amphibious assault ship. It is being mothballed.

My friend PTS weighted in:

“There are multiple problems with the EPF and they were over hyped and vastly underdelivered. As mentioned, they are fragile with their aluminum hulls as demonstrated of the coast of Yemen. They are un-armed and should have least been equipped with CIWS or SEARAM but the aluminum hull could not support their weight. The flight deck could not support CH53, CH46 or V22 ops so pretty much a non-starter. The flow path of heavier cargo from the flight deck down to the vehicle deck was also not really good either. Now lets talk the berthing… they should have modified the internals tremendously, but they left it pretty much with no cabins, no storage and airline seating. Want to put a company of Marines and their AAV or other vehicles… well they are left sleeping in the airline seating area and will not enough food to toliets to support them for more than a few days without turning the vehicle deck over to containerized storage. A huge issue is the speed and the ships ride. With low sea states you could get 35 kts… but anything higher the speed dropped quickly till you would do better traveling in an old WW2 LST (at 12kts) to move from Okinawa to South Korea. Buddies of mine who did that trip would have been combat ineffective after their slow trip across that distance due to the poor sea keeping abilities in Blue Waters. Finally, they never were able to get it capable of doing a drop of AAV straight into the water and recover them. The real limitations are vast.”

The former HSV-2 Swift, laid up at Ampelakia, Salamina, Greece. In July 2015, the ship was leased by the UAE National Marine Dredging Company & was used to carry aid through Bab Al Mandab strait. On 1 Oct 2016, the ship was attacked and damaged off the coast of Yemen by Houthis.

2016. The Houthis have gotten even

She didn’t fare well (photo from 2021):

Image

The same Austal USA that just sent some grifters packing after bilking taxpayers:

“The SEC alleges that, from at least January 2013 through July 2016, Austal USA’s former president, Craig D. Perciavalle, its current director of financial analysis, Joseph A. Runkel, and former director of the Littoral Combat Ships program, William O. Adams, engaged in a scheme to artificially reduce the cost estimates to complete certain shipbuilding projects for the U.S. Navy by tens of millions of dollars. The complaint alleges that Perciavalle, Runkel, and Adams knew that Austal USA’s shipbuilding costs were rising and higher than planned, but they directed others to arbitrarily lower the cost estimates to meet Austal USA’s revenue budget and revenue projections.”

The Navy department that is in charge of shipbuilding and repair is Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA), the largest of the U.S. Navy’s five system commands.

They have 83,000 people; it’s twice the size of the entire US Coast Guard.

83,000

They can’t get anything right.

How could this happen with the streamlined acquisition system at the Pentagon?

dodprocurement

Fire the Chief of Naval Operations immediately.

Fire them all.

H/T to John A Conrad IV

 
Email me at cgpodcast@pm.me

Podcasts

scotthortonshow logosq

coi banner sq2@0.5x

liberty weekly thumbnail

Don't Tread on Anyone Logo

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

313x0w (1)

Pin It on Pinterest